Curriculum Studies in the posthuman condition/posthuman curriculum (studies)
Abstract
In this article we discuss the difference between curriculum studies (as a field of inquiry) in the posthuman condition and posthuman curriculum (studies). The posthuman condition is characterised by both posthumanism and post-anthropocentrism and relates respectively, to how we now define human given humans’ entanglement with new technologies, and the ethical response-ability of humans in intra-action with the more-than-human-world in a context of impending ecological disaster. In this article we shall argue that although Enlightenment humanism has been challenged philosophically/conceptually both in discourses on anti-humanism and posthumanism, humanist approaches to curriculum studies remain with us in the posthuman condition – the ghosts of Dewey, Tyler, Freire, etc., imbue much of curriculum work. However, the posthuman condition also produces posthuman thought that makes it possible to reimagine curriculum studies, that we shall call posthuman curriculum (studies). We shall review different approaches to curriculum studies in the posthuman condition, and then turn our attention to posthuman curriculum (studies). We argue that curriculum (as a vital concept) in posthumanist terms is intelligible and manifests through intra-actions, processes of becoming and experimenting. Set against sedentary states of being that mark curriculum studies in the posthuman condition; becoming, intra-acting and experimenting in posthuman curriculum (studies) are acts, doings in and of this world. The acts and doings in posthuman curriculum (studies) that are mostly written about include: improvisation, theorisation and diffraction. To these we add and specifically discuss quantum tunnelling, tracing, and desiring. Other forms of curriculum experimentation worthy of consideration in posthuman curriculum (studies) but not discussed in the article are queering, imagining, and writing. Towards the end we make the point that although some connections with the past (such as those that haunt curriculum discourses) can be threatening to life, connections of the thick now hold potential and radical openness for newness.
References
Aoki, Ted. 1999. “Rethinking curriculum and pedagogy.” Kappa Delta Pi Record Summer: 180‒181.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Barad, Karen and Daniela Gandorfer. 2021. “Political desirings: Yearnings for mattering (,) differently.” Theory & Event 24(1): 14‒66.
Baszile, Denise T. 2017. “Haunting revelations: Teaching amidst the ruins of race, gender and violence.” In The reconceptualization of curriculum studies: A festschrift in honor of William F. Pinar, ed. Mary A. Doll, 8‒16. London: Routledge.
Biggs, John. 2014. “Constructive alignment in university teaching.” HERDSA Review of Higher Education 1: 5‒22.
Bowers, Chet. 1980. “Curriculum as cultural reproduction: An examination of the metaphor as carrier of ideology.” Teachers College Record 82(2): 267–290.
Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis. 1976. Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Bozalek, Vivienne. 2022. “Uncertainty or indeterminacy? Reconfiguring curriculum through agential realism.” Education as Change 26(11507): 1‒21. http://dx.doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/11507.
Bozalek, Vivienne, Michalinos Zembylas, Siddique Motala, and Dorothee Hӧlscher. 2021. Higher education hauntologies: Living with ghosts for a justice-to-come. London: Routledge.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2019. Posthuman knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Braidotti, Rosi and Maria. Hlavajova. 2018. Posthuman glossary. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Crutzen, Paul J. and Eugene F. Stoermer. 2000. “The Anthropocene.” Global Change Newsletter 41(1): 17‒18.
Deever, Brian. 1996. “If not now, when? Radical theory and systematic curriculum reform.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 28(2): 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027980280204.
Derrida, Jacques. 1994. The spectre of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international. Translated by P. Kamuf. London: Routledge.
Doll, William, E. 2002. “Ghosts and the curriculum.” In Curriculum visions, eds. William Doll and Noel Gough, 23‒70. New York: Peter Lang.
Doll, William E. and Noel Gough. (Ed.). 2002. Curriculum visions. New York: Peter Lang.
Du Preez, Petro. 2008. “Dialogue as facilitation strategy: Infusing the classroom with a culture of human rights.” PhD thesis, Stellenbosch University.
Du Preez, Petro and Shan Simmonds. 2014. “Curriculum, curriculum development, curriculum studies? Problematising theoretical ambiguities in doctoral theses in the education field.” South African Journal of Education 34(2): 1‒14.
Du Preez, Petro and Shan Simmonds. 2021. “Reading posthumanism and decolonisation diffractively towards (re)configuring an ontoepistemic approach to religion education.” British Journal of Religious Education 43(1): 80‒90.
Du Preez, Petro and Jean Du Toit. 2022. “Why read (diffractively)?” South African Journal of Higher Education 36(1): 115‒135.
Du Preez, Petro and Lesley Le Grange. 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic, online teaching/learning, the digital divide and epistemological access. In Re-thinking the Humanities curriculum within the time of COVID-19, ed. Labby Ramrathan, Johannes A. Smit, Nobuhle Hlongwe, and Nhlanhla Mkhize, 90‒106. Pietermaritzburg: CSSALL Publishers (Alternation African Scholarship Book Series, Volume 1).
Du Preez, Petro, Lesley Le Grange, and Shan Simmonds. 2022. “Rethinking curriculum inquiry in the posthuman condition: A critical posthumanist stance.” Education as Change 26(11460): 1‒20. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/11460.
Ellsworth, Elizabeth. 1989. “Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy.” Harvard Education Review 59(3): 297–324. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250.
Freire, Paulo. 1972. Pedagogy of the oppressed London: Penguin.
Gan, Elaine, Anna Tsing, Heather Swanson, and Nils Bubandt. “Introduction: Haunted landscapes of the Anthropocene.” In Arts of living on a damaged planet: Ghosts of the Anthropocene, ed. Anna Tsing, Heather Swanson, Elaine Gan, and Nils Bubandt, G1‒G14. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Giffney, Noreen and Myra Hird. 2008. “Introduction: Queering the non/human.” In Queering the non/human, ed. Noreen Giffney and Myra Hird, 1‒16. England and USA: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Gough, Noel. 2013. “Towards a deconstructive nonalignment: A complexivist view of curriculum, teaching and learning.” South African Journal of Higher Education 27(5): 1213‒1233.
Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Stay with the trouble: Making kin on the Chthulucene. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Hepler, Sarah, Susan Cannon, Courtney Hartnett, and Teri Peitso-Holbrook. 2019. “Undoing and doing-with: Practices of diffractive reading and writing in higher education (Viewpoint).” In Posthumanism and higher education: Reimagining pedagogy, practice and research, ed. Carol A. Taylor and Annouchka Bayley, 141–151. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kolbert, Elizabeth. 2014. The sixth extinction. New York: Henry Holt Company.
Kuhn, Thomas, S. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Le Grange, Lesley. 2007. “Integrating western and indigenous knowledge systems: The basis for effective science education in South Africa?” International Review of Education 53(5‒6): 577‒591.
Le Grange, Lesley. 2011a. “A pedagogy of hope after Paulo Freire.” South African Journal of Higher Education 25(1): 183‒189.
Le Grange, Lesley. 2011b. “Sustainability and higher education: From arborescent to rhizomatic thinking.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(7): 742‒754.
Le Grange, Lesley. 2014. “Curriculum research in South Africa.” In International Handbook of Curriculum Research, ed. William F. Pinar, 466‒475. 2nd Edition. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Le Grange, Lesley. 2016. “Sustainability education and (curriculum) improvisation.” Southern African Journal of Environmental Education 32: 26‒36.
Le Grange, Lesley. 2018a. “A (re)turn to realism(s).” Educational Philosophy and Theory 50(14): 1607‒1608. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2018.1461424.
Le Grange, Lesley. 2018b. “Spinoza, deep ecology and education informed by a (post)human sensibility.” Education Philosophy and Theory 50(9): 878‒887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1384723.
Le Grange, Lesley. 2018c. “Decolonising, Africanising, indigenising, and internationalising curriculum studies: Opportunities to (re)imagine the field.” Journal of Education 74: 4‒18.
Le Grange, Lesley. 2020. “Sustainability higher education in the context of Bearn’s University of Beauty.” Sustainability 12: 10533. doi:10.3390/su122410533.
Le Grange, Lesley. 2021. “(Individual) responsibility in decolonising the university curriculum.” South African Journal of Higher Education 35(1): 4‒20. https://dx.doi.org/10.20853/35-1-4416.
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Translated by Geoffrey Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Moore, Jason W. 2015. Capitalism in the web of life. London: Verso.
Murris, Karin and Vivienne Bozalek. 2019. “Diffracting diffractive reading of texts as methodology.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 51(14): 1504‒1517. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2019.1570843.
Pinar, William F. 1975. “The method of currere.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, D.C.
Pinar, William F. 1978. “The reconceptualisation of curriculum studies.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 10(3): 205‒214.
Pinar, William F. (Ed.). 2014. International Handbook of Curriculum Research. 2nd Edition. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Pinar, William F. 2011 The character of curriculum studies: Bildung, currere and the recurring question of the subject. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reddy, Chris. 2014. “Curriculum: Exploring an ever-changing landscape.” In Curriculum Studies: Visions and imaginings, ed. Petro Du Preez and Chris Reddy, 11‒31. Cape Town: Pearson Holding Southern Africa.
Roux, Cornelia and Anne Becker. 2016. “Humanising higher education in South Africa through dialogue and praxis.” Educational Research for Social Change 5(1): 131‒143.
Rule, Peter. 2011. “Bakhtin and Freire: Dialogue, dialectic and boundary learning.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(9): 924‒942.
Schwab, Joseph J. 1969. “The practical: A language for curriculum.” The School Review 78(1): 1‒23.
Schwab, Klaus. 2015. “The fourth industrial revolution.” Foreign Affairs 12 December.
Sinwell, Luke. 2022. “Teaching and learning Paulo Freire: South Africa’s communities of struggle.” Education as Change 26(9368): 1‒19. doi.org/10.25159/1947.9417/9368.
Stables, Andrew. 2003. “Book review: Curriculum visions.” Environmental Education Research 9(4): 543‒544.
Steyn, Shani. 2020. “Currere as deracialisation: An autobiographical reflection of a white teacher in multicultural post-apartheid South African classrooms.” Unpublished doctoral thesis. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.
Tuck, Eve and K. Wayne Yang. 2012. “Decolonization is not a metaphor.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society 1(1): 1‒40.
Tyler, Ralph W. 1949. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ulmer, Jasmine B. 2017. “Writing slow ontology.” Qualitative Inquiry 23(3): 201‒211.
Verhoef, Anné and Petro Du Preez. 2020. “Higher education curriculum transformation in and of radical immanence: Towards a free and creative ethics.” Alternation 31: 143‒163. 10.29086/2519-5476/2020/sp31a8.
Wallin, Jason J. 2010. A Deleuzian approach to curriculum: Essays on a pedagogical life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
wa’ Thiong’o, Ngũgĩ. 1981. Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. Nairobi: East African Education Publishers.
Copyright (c) 2023 L. Le Grange, Petro Du Preez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
