Online or offline supervision? Postgraduate supervisors state their position at University of South Africa
Abstract
The demands of postgraduate supervision are huge for supervisors. These demands can however be lessened by taking advantage of the online operated information and communication technology (ICT). Supervising online provides important tools and/or applications which are the 21st century era enablers of supervision especially in an open and distance learning (ODL) institution such as University of South Africa (UNISA). The supervisor-student working relationship, however, presents a human aspect that should take precedence over technology and thus guide how technology can be used in supervision. It is in this light that this reported study inquired into the supervisors’ knowledge of the technological tools and their stance in the use of (online) technology in their supervision given the human aspect. UNISA’s hundred-and-twenty-nine supervisors who are attached to College of Education (CEDU) were investigated in this study with respect to their supervision characteristics and exposure to technology and level of knowledge of the technological tools. That was followed up by face-to-face interviews with seven supervisors to determine their stance about the use of technology given the human aspect of students. The findings showed that the supervisors are knowledgeable in terms of the tools or applications such as MS Word, myUnisa and Discussion Forum. Furthermore, the findings indicated that there is a need for the training of other supervisors with respect to the use of certain online applications and/or tools. The most important finding is that supervisors value the human aspect such that – though supervisors are positive about the role of technology in supervision, the human aspect should enjoy precedence in their supervision of students.
References
Abiddin, N.Z., Ismail, A. and A. Ismail. 2011. Effective supervisory approach in enhancing postgraduate research studies. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1(2): 206-217.
Barab, S.A., Barnett, M. and K. Squire. 2002. Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterising the essential tensions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 11(4): 489-542.
Creswell, J.W. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Third edition. Los Angeles: Sage.
Evans, T. (1995). Postgraduate research supervision in the emerging ‘open’ universities. Australian Universities’ Review 2: 23-27.
Field, A.P. 2006. The behavioural inhibition system and the verbal information pathway to children’s fears. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 115(4): 742-752.
Glasow, P.A. 2005. Fundamentals of survey research methodology. McLean: MITRE.
George, D. and P. Mallery. 2003. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update. Fourth edition. Bpston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M. and M. Sarstedt. 2014. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Harris, J.B., P. Mishra and M. Koehler. 2009. Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge; Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 41(4): 393-416.
Koehler, M.J. and P. Mishra. 2008. Introducing TPACK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators. New York: Routledge.
Koehler, M.J. and P. Mishra. 2009. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education. Available at: http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article1.cfm. Accessed on 20 April 2017.
Lave, J. 1993. Introduction. In Lave, J. and S. Chaiklin (Eds.). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J. and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mabovula, N.N. 2011. The erosion of African communal values: A reappraisal of the African ubuntu philosophy. Inkanyiso, Journal of Humuman & Social Sciences 3(1): 38-47
Masango, M.S.S. 2006. African spirituality that shapes the concept of Ubuntu. Verbum et Ecclesia 27(3): 930-943.
Mbangwana, M.A. 2008. Introduction of ICT in schools and classrooms in Cameroon. Available at: http://www.rocare.org/changingMindsets/pdf/ch09-I. Accessed on 25 May 2017.
McKavanagh, C., Bryant, K., Finger, G. and H. Middleton. 2004. Information and communication technologies and higher degree research supervision. Paper presented at the Annual International HERDSA Conference. Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia.
McMillan, J. and S. Schumacher. 2014. Research in education: Evidenced-based inquiry. Seventh edition. Harlow: Pearson.
Mishra, P. and M.J. Koehler. 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teachers’ knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6): 1017-1054.
Roets, L. 2013. Learning through reflection: Supervising DRC master’s degree students within the open distance and learning context. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 3(10): 139-149.
Salkind, N.J. 2012. Exploring research. Eighth edition. New York: Pearson.
Shulman, L.S. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57(1): 1-21.
Stacey, E. and W. Fountain. 2001. Student and supervisor perspectives in a computer-mediated research relationship. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE). Melbourne, Australia.
Valetsianos, G. (Ed.). 2010. Emerging technologies in distance education. AU Press: Athabasca University.
Wheeler, S. 2010. What is so innovative about ICT? Available at: http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.com/2010/04/whats-so-innovative-about-ict.html. Accessed on 27 June 2017.
Copyright (c) 2019 Mishack T Gumbo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
