Usage of Blackboard Learn for Teaching and Learning in the Historically Disadvantaged Institution: Challenges and prospects

  • W. Maluleke University of Limpopo, Polokwane
Keywords: Bachelor of Arts: Criminology and Psychology programme, Blackboard Learn, challendes, economic, educational, Historically Disadvantaged Institution, professorship, prospects, social, South Africa, technology, transformation, University of Limpopo

Abstract

The utilisation of online platform Blackboard Learn for Teaching and Learning (T & L) has become an essential and obligatory component of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). This study research aims to examine the difficulties and potential of its implementation at a Historically Disadvantaged Institution (HDI) like University of Limpopo (UL), with a focus on the Bachelor of Arts (BA) programme in Criminology and Psychology (Crim & Psych) as guided by University of Limpopo Faculty of Humanities Multimodal Teaching and Learning Plan (UL FHMTLP). This qualitative study employed an empirical research design, selecting Twelve (12) permanent Academics/Lecturers from the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at UL for interview purposes. The verbatim responses from the interviews were analysed to identify the key themes and sub-themes of the study using the inductive Thematic Content Analysis (TCA) method.

This study revealed that there is a lack of utilisation of Blackboard Learn at UL, as well as ineffective adaptation of current strategies and UL FHMTLP implementations. Many Lecturers still depend on contact T & L and the use of Blackboard Learn to connect the operations of this programme is currently unsuccessful. Recommendations consist of regular training and refreshment courses on the application of this technology, such as the Learning Management System (LMS) provided by the Information and Communications Technology [ICT]-electronic-(e)-Learning Unit. This could potentially facilitate collaborations between Natural Sciences (Technology ‒ Blackboard Learn) and Human Sciences (Crim & Psych) to generate new knowledge, while also clearly providing the advantages of technology utilisation for T & L at UL. This kind of innovation could accommodate “economical, educational, technical, and social transformations” to address the mentioned challenges and opportunities, while making contributions to the field of professorship, with a focus on the South African Future Professors Programme (FPP) Phase 2 Cohort 1 2022‒2023, utilising Blackboard Learn for T & L in a HDI to outline the existing challenges and possibilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

W. Maluleke, University of Limpopo, Polokwane

Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice

References

Alhojailan, M. I. 2012. “Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation.” West East Journal of Social Science 1(1): 39.

Al-Mutairi, N. M. 2021. “Connectivism learning theory to enhance higher education in the context of coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic.” International Journal of Educational Sciences 35(3): 29‒39.

Arkorful, V. and N. Abaidoo. 2015. “The role of e-learning, advantages, and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education.” International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 12(1): 29‒42.

Basilaia, G., M. Dgebuadze, M. Kantaria, and G. Chokhonelidze. 2020. “Replacing the classic learning form at universities as an immediate response to the COVID-19 virus infection in Georgia.” International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 8(III): 101‒110.

Blackboard Learn Guide. 2020. https://www.ul.ac.za/index.php?Entity=Copyright%20and%20Blackboard. (Accessed 18 October 2023).

Blackboard Learn Guide. 2022. “What Is Blackboard Learn?” https://help.blackboard.com/Learn/Instructor/Ultra/Getting_Started/What_Is_Blackboard_Learn. (Accessed 18 October 2023).

Blackboard Learn Guide. 2023. “Designed with the modern learner in mind.” https://www.anthology.com/products/teaching-and-learning/learning-effectiveness/blackboard-learn. (Accessed 18 October 2023).

Boateng, F. K. 2020. Higher education systems and institutions. Netherlands: Springer.

Boshielo, A. 2014. “The impact of Blackboard Learn as a Learning Management System for University of Limpopo students.” Unpublished Master of Business Administration Dissertation. Sovenga: University of Limpopo.

Bradford, P., M. Porciello, N. Balkon, and D. Backus. 2007. “The Blackboard learning system: The be all and end all in educational instruction?” Journal of Educational Technology Systems 35(3): 301‒314.

Braun, V. and V. Clarke. 2014. “What can ‘thematic analysis’ offer health and wellbeing researchers?” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 9(1): 1‒2.

Bruffee, K. A. A. 1993. Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED364160. Johns Hopkins University Press. (Accessed 10 September 2023).

Bryman, A. 2013. Social research methods. Los Angeles: Oxford Press.

Chang, S., E. Pierson, P. W. Koh, J. Gerardin, B. Redbird, D. Grusky, and J. Leskovec. 2021. “Mobility network models of COVID-19 explain inequities and inform reopening.” Nature 5(4): 82‒87.

Chetty, D. 2022. Educational Technology in Higher Education (ETIE702). Durban: Durban University of Technology. (Study guide ETIE702).

Cojocariu, V. M., I. Lazar, V. Nedeff, and G. Lazar. 2014. “SWOT analysis of e-learning educational services from the perspective of their beneficiaries.” Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences 116(1): 1999‒2003.

Council of Higher Education. 2020. Quality assurance guidelines for emergency remote teaching and learning and assessment during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Department of Higher Education and Training: Pretoria.

Creswell, J. 2009. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. 2007. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. Sage Publications: London.

Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Downes, S. 2005. “An introduction to connective.” European Journal of Open, Distance and Electronic Learning 26(4): 77‒101.

Downes, S. 2006. “Learning networks and connective knowledge.” Collective Intelligence and Electronic -learning 20(1): 1‒26.

Downes, S. 2019. “Recent work in connectivism.” European Journal of Open, Distance and Electronic ‒Learning 22(2): 113‒132.

Downes, S. 2007. “What connectivism?” http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html. (Accessed 16 September 2024).

Du Plooy-Cilliers, F. Davis, C and Bezuidenhout, M. 2014. Research matters. Cape Town: Juta.

Dziubaniuk, O., M. Ivanova-Gongne, and M. Nyholm. 2023. “Learning and teaching sustainable business in the digital era: A connectivism theory approach.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 20(1): 1‒23.

Flick, U. 2014. An introduction to qualitative research. 5th Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Flick, U. 2015. Introducing research methodology. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Garrison, D. R and H. Kanuka. 2004. “Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education.” The Internet and Higher Education 7(2): 95‒105.

Gonzalez, T., M. A. De La Rubia, K. P. Hincz, M. Comas-Lopez, L. Subirats, S. Fort, and G. M. Sacha. 2020. “Influence of COVID-19 confinement on students’ performance in higher education.” PLOS One 15(10): 1‒23.

Hayat, A. A., M. H. Keshavarzi, S. Zare, L. Bazrafcan, R. Rezaee, S. A. Faghihi, M. Amini, and J. Kojuri. 2021. “Challenges and opportunities from the COVID-19 pandemic.” Bio Medical Education 21(1): 1‒13.

Kop, R. and A. Hill. 2008. “Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past?” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 9(3): 1‒13.

Kumar, R. 2014. Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. London: Sage.

Kummitha, H. R., N. Kolloju, P. Chittoor, and V. Madepalli. 2021. “Coronavirus disease 2019 and its effect on teaching and learning process in the higher educational institutions.” Higher Education for the Future 8(1): 90‒107.

Lalduhawma, L. P., L. Thangmawia, and J. Hussain. 2022. “Effectiveness of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mizoram.” Journal of Education and Electronic Learning Research 9(3): 175‒183.

Liamputtong, P. 2013. Qualitative research methods. 4th Edition. Victoria: Oxford.

Livingstone, S. 2012. “Socrates centre for learning: Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education.” Oxford Review of Education 38(1): 9‒24.

Matlala, M. M. 2012. “The use of the Automated Fingerprints Identification System to improve the quality of service rendered by the South African Police Service in the East Rand.” Unpublished Magister Technologiae: Police Science dissertation. University of South Africa: Pretoria.

Maxfield, M. G. and E. Babbie. 1995. Research methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology. Wadsworth: Belmont.

McBrien, J. L., R. Cheng, and P. Jones. 2009. “Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 10(3): 1‒17.

Meyers, C. and T. B. Jones. 1993. Promoting active learning: Strategies for the College classroom. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED358757. (Accessed 10 September 2023).

Mills, J. and M. Birks. 2014. Qualitative methodology. London: Sage.

Mokoena-de Beer, A. G. and S. M. Moloko. 2022. “Nurse lecturers’ experiences with online teaching during the pandemic at a public university in Gauteng, South Africa.” Curationis 45(1): 1‒9.

Motseki, M. M., W. Maluleke, and J. Barkhuizen. 2021. “Improving Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Emergency of Coronavirus disease-2019 Pandemic: Case Studies from Departments of Criminology and Criminal Justice and Legal Science.” European Journal of Economics, Law and Social Sciences 5(2): 319‒345.

Mouton, J. 2009. How to succeed in your master’s and doctoral studies? A Southern African guide and resource book. Van Schaik: Hartfield.

Mukhtar, K., K. Javed, M. Arooj, and A. Sethi. 2020. “Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era.” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 36(4): 27‒31.

Naidoo, G. M. and A. R. Moonasamy. 2022. “WhatsApp as A Tool for Teaching and Learning during the COVID-19 Lockdown.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 10(10): 570‒580.

Odeku, K. S. 2021. “Conducting law pedagogy using virtual classroom in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: Opportunities and existing obstacles.” Journal of Educational and Social Research 11(1): 101‒101.

Owusu-Acheaw, M. and A. G. Larson. 2015. “Use of social media and its impact on academic performance of tertiary institution students: A study of students of Koforidua Polytechnic, Ghana.” Journal of Education and Practice 6(6): 94‒101.

Pillay, A. M and J. Madzimure. 2023. “Analysis of Online Teaching and Learning Strategies and Challenges in the COVID-19 Era: Lessons from South Africa.” New Trends in Social and Liberal Sciences 8(1): 21‒37.

Purwanto, A. 2020. “University students online learning system during Covid-19 pandemic: Advantages, constraints, and solutions.” Systematic Review in Pharmacy 11(7): 570‒576.

Rossouw, D. and G. A. Goldman. 2023. “Technology and collaboration as strategic drivers shaping higher education.” The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 19(1): 1‒10.

Sadeghi, M. 2019. “A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations.” International Journal of Research in English Education 4(1): 80‒88.

Sahu, K. K., A. K. Mishra, and A. Lal. 2020. “Coronavirus disease-2019: An update on third coronavirus outbreak of 21st century.” An International Journal of Medicine 113(5): 384‒386.

Seetal, I., S. Gunness, and V. Teeroovengadum. 2021. “Educational disruptions during the COVID-19 crisis in Small Island Developing States: Preparedness and efficacy of academics for online teaching.” International Review of Education 67(6): 185‒217.

Selelo, M. E and M. G. Manamela. 2022. “Coining online Teaching and Learning in higher education: Reference to COVID-19 Pandemic in South Africa.” International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies 9(2): 54‒62.

Siemens, G. 2004. “Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age.” International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2(1): 14‒16.

Singh, V. and A. Thurman. 2019. “How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988‒2018).” American Journal of Distance Education 33(4): 289‒306.

Tarrant, H. 2022. Learning curve: The continent needs ‒ A co-ordinated approach to online education. Ndabeni, Cape Town: African Decisions.

Terre Blanche, M., M. J. Terre Blanche, K. Durrheim, and D. Painter. 2006. Research design. Applied methods for the social sciences, edited by. Cape Town: Juta.

The University of Kent. 2012. “Reflective learning.” https://www.kent.ac.uk/learning/PDP-and-employability/pdp/reflective.html. (Accessed 15 August 2023).

Timmis, S. P. Broadfoot, p R. Sutherland, and A. Oldfield. 2016. “Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges, and risks.” British Educational Research Journal 42(3): 454‒476.

UL see University of Limpopo.

University of Limpopo. 2020. “University of Limpopo Faculty Multimodal Teaching and Learning Plan (UL FHMTLP).” Electronic mail. Limpopo Province. (Notes in possession of researcher).

Yang, X., Y. Yu, J. Xu, H. Shu, H. Liu, Y. Wu, L. Zhang, Z. Yu, M. Fang, T. Yu, and Y. Wang. 2020. “Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A single-centred, retrospective, observational study.” The Lancet Respiratory Medicine 8(5): 475‒481.

Published
2024-10-27
How to Cite
Maluleke, W. 2024. “Usage of Blackboard Learn for Teaching and Learning in the Historically Disadvantaged Institution: Challenges and Prospects”. South African Journal of Higher Education 38 (5), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.20853/38-5-6409.