GeoGebra, a dynamic software for conceptual understanding and visualisation - Multi-directionality of influence

  • A. Bayaga Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha
Keywords: GeoGebra, STEM education, cognitive outcomes, digital learning tools

Abstract

This study delves into the dynamic interplay between GeoGebra, a prominent interactive digital tool, and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) cognition, focusing on teachers. Anchored by the objective to unravel how GeoGebra influences conceptual understanding and visualisation, the research hypothesises that GeoGebra significantly influences cognitive outcomes in STEM cognition. Thus, aiming to assess the hypothesis that GeoGebra significantly influences cognitive outcomes, a Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) was employed. Data was collected through a survey designed to capture the experiences and interactions of 71 teachers with GeoGebra. The significant direct pathways (Analogical Comparison Principle (ACP) and Error and Misconceptions Reflection Principle (EMR) and between Mathematical and Computational Algorithms (MCA) and Analogical Comparison Principle (ACP)) established empirical evidence to the theory that GeoGebra can facilitate conceptual understanding as well as cognitive development. Additionally, the indirect pathways with no significant effects such as Mathematical Cognition (MAS) to ACP to EMR was indicative of the fact that influence of GeoGebra operates more through direct interactions with the software as opposed to through mediated learning processes. The conclusion is that influence of GeoGebra is not uniform across all contexts, indicative of the fact that factors such as geographical location play a critical role in shaping the software’s effectiveness in enhancing STEM education. In sum, while GeoGebra is a potent interactive digital tool for enhancing STEM cognition, the results call for tailored strategies in integrating digital tools like GeoGebra, by considering the specific needs of different learning context

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

A. Bayaga, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha

Professor. A. Bayaga

Senior Secondary Education

 

References

Alkhateeb, M. A. and A. M. Al-Duwairi. 2019. “The Effect of Using Mobile Applications (GeoGebra and Sketchpad) on the Students’ Achievement.” International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 14(3): 523–533.

Arbain, N. and N. A. Shukor. 2015. The Effects of GeoGebra on Students Achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 172: 208‒214.

Birgin, O. and K. U. Yazıcı. 2021. “The effect of GeoGebra software-supported mathematics instruction on eighth-grade students’ conceptual understanding and retention.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 37(4): 925‒939.

Dwiranata, D., D. Pramita, and S. Syaharuddin. 2019. “Development of Android-Based Interactive Mathematics Learning Media on Class X High School Three-Dimensional Material.” Journal of Variants 3(1): 1–5.

Escuder, A. and J. M. Furner. 2011. “The Impact of GeoGebra in Math Teacher’s Professional Development.” In International Conference on Technologies in Collegiate Mathematics, 76‒84. Norfolk, USA.

Faradiba, S. S., Z. Abidin, and I. Khasanah. 2023. “Geogebra Application Training on Three-Dimensional Materials.” Journal of Community Service and Educational Research 1(3): 148–155.

Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.

GeoGebra. 2011. “Official GeoGebra Manual 1”, 1‒281. https://research.shu.ac.uk/geogebra/GIS_Guides/Official%20GeoGebra%20Manual.pdf.

GeoGebra. nd. GeoGebra: Dynamic Mathematics for Everyone (Version 6.0). GeoGebra. https://www.geogebra.org/m/NpFST2An.

Hair, J. F., G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2022. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ishartono, N., A. Nurcahyo, M. Waluyo, H. J. Prayitno, and M. Hanifah. 2022. “Integrating Geogebra into the Flipped Learning Approach to Improve Students’ Self-Regulated Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal on Mathematics Education 13(1): 69‒86.

Kushwaha, R. C., P. K. Chaurasia, and A. Singhal. 2013. “Creating Dynamic Webpage for GeoGebra Quiz Applet.” International Journal of Information and Computation Technology 3(3): 175‒180.

Machromah, I. U., M. E. R. Purnomo, and C. K. Sari. 2019. “Learning calculus with GeoGebra at college.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1180: 11‒24.

Marciuc, D., C. Miron, and E. S. Barna. 2016. “Using Geogebra Software in The Teaching of Oscillatory Motions.” Romanian Reports in Physics 68(3): 1296‒1311.

Maskur, R. 2020. “The effectiveness of problem-based learning and aptitude treatment interaction in improving mathematical creative thinking skills on curriculum.” European Journal of Educational Research 9(1): 375‒383.

Mussoi, E. M. 2011. “GeoGebra and eXe Learning: Applicability in the teaching of Physics and Mathematics.” Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics 9(2): 61‒66.

Navetta, A. 2016. “Visualizing Functions of Complex Numbers Using GeoGebra. Rev. Acad. Colomb.” Cien.ExactasFísicas Nat. 5: 17‒25.

Noor, P. P. and A. P. Timeless. 2022. “Higher order thinking skills in the development of high school mathematics learning.” Journal of Education FKIP UNMA 8(2): 466‒473.

Samura, A. O. 2023. “Improving Mathematics Critical Thinking Skills of Junior High School Students Using Blended Learning Model (BLM) in GeoGebra Assisted Mathematics Learning.” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 17(2): 34‒47.

Sari, P., A. Hadiyan, and D. Antari. 2018. “Exploring Derivatives by Means of GeoGebra.” IJEME 2: 65‒78.

Septian, A., S. Inayah, R. F. Suwarman, and R. Nugraha. 2020. “GeoGebra-Assisted Problem Based Learning to Improve Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability.” Proceedings of the SEMANTIK Conference of Mathematics Education (SEMANTIK 2019): 67‒71.

Septian, A. and S. Prabawanto. 2020. “Mathematical representation ability through GeoGebra-assisted project-based learning models.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1657: 2–10.

Septian, A. 2022. “Student’s mathematical connection ability through GeoGebra assisted project-based learning model.” Jurnal Elem 8(1): 89–98.

Suryawan, I. P. P. and D. Permana. 2020. “Geogebra-based online learning media as an effort to improve understanding of mathematical concepts.” Prism 9(1): 108‒117.

Suweken, G. 2019. “STEM-Oriented Mathematics Learning with GeoGebra.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Innovative Research Across Disciplines (ICIRAD 2019). Bali, Indonesia, 20‒21 September.

Velikova, E. and M. Petkova. 2019. “Analysing Students’ Creativity in Integrating GeoGebra Applets in Solving Geometrical. Problems.” Baltic Journal of Modern Computing 7(3): 419‒429.

Walsh, T. 2017. “Creating interactive physics simulations using the power of GeoGebra.” The Physics Teacher 55(5): 316‒317.

Yimer, S. T. and N. N. Feza. 2020. “Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra.” International. Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 15: 1‒26.

Published
2024-06-22
How to Cite
Bayaga, A. 2024. “GeoGebra, a Dynamic Software for Conceptual Understanding and Visualisation - Multi-Directionality of Influence”. South African Journal of Higher Education 38 (3), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.20853/38-3-6363.