Disruptions in higher education: Mitigating issues of access and success in the COVID-19 pandemic

Keywords: access in higher education, COVID-19 pandemic, disruptions, higher education, success in higher education, teaching and learning, transformation

Abstract

Disruptions create both new opportunities and challenges in higher education. In settled times, education systems plod along with an assumed and uncritical acceptance of normalcy of the status-quo. When the status quo is disrupted, suddenly the patched-up cracks reveal the depth and magnitude of the simmering problems of the sector in graphic ways.

Access and success are arguably the two most poignant indicators of the performance of higher education systems. In post-colonial societies such as South Africa, access is used to estimate progress in broadening participation in higher education, particularly to young people from previously disadvantaged communities. Access has two broad meanings: increased enrolments and enhanced epistemological impact. Success, on the other hand is measured variously but mainly through graduation and progression rates across different socio-economic higher education students groups and also on the quality of their performances. 

In this article we provide a theoretical discussion of the notions of disruptions and their impact in higher education; examine the questions of access and success in higher education; and conclude that the chasm lying between access by participation and access by success requires substantial transformation of a knowledge system that is alien to the cultural context of the country; rebalancing and recalibrating the broader ideological environment that privileges liberalism while paying token attention to social justice and inclusion beyond mere symbolism; and a persistent refocusing on emancipatory pedagogies, designed to liberate rather than subjugate graduates into pigeon holed choices in the labour market which are designed to serve the needs of owners of capital as the primary motive of employment.

We conclude by identifying critical factors that appear to lead to a failure by universities to bridge the gap between access by participation and access by success or epistemological access. Most of these tend to be structurally embedded in the fabric of higher education institutions and the sector and include, a persistent coloniality of the sector, disjuncture between the intended ideological framework guiding national development and the operating economic models and institutional inertia to move beyond the canonical bases of higher education based on western epistemes.

Author Biographies

F. Maringe, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

Felix Maringe is Professor of Leadership and Higher Education in the division of Leadership and Policy Stuides (ELPS) at the WITS School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand

O. Chiramba, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg

Otilia Chiramba is currently a Post-Doctoral Research Fellow at the University of Johannesburg. Her research interest is in higher education specifically focusing on organizational resilience during disruptions and underprivileged students in South African higher education systems and beyond. Her research work is informed by theories of resilience and social justice and has published in accredited academic journals and prestigious books. She has been involved in grant funded projects and currently she is one of the lead researchers in a project about epistemic disruptions in reconstituting higher education pedagogy in South Africa.

Faculty of Education

References

Ampuja, Marko. 2015. “Globalisation and Neo-liberalism.” In Second International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research, ed. J. Zajda. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9493-0_2.

Badat, Saleem. 2021. Overview and Synthesis. 25 Year Review of South African Higher Education. CHE, South Africa.

Berger, P. L. and T. Luckman. 1991. The Social Construction of Reality, a Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London Penguin Books Ltd.

Carlsson, Magnus, B. Gordon, Björn Öckert Dahl, and Dan-Olof Rooth. 2015. “The effect of schooling on cognitive skills.” Review of Economics and Statistics 97(3): 533‒547.

CHE. 2019. “VitalStats: Public Higher Education 2017.” Pretoria: CHE.

Festinger, Leon. 1957. “Social comparison theory.” Selective Exposure Theory 16.

Field, S., P. Musset, and J. Álvarez-Galván. 2014. A Skills beyond School Review of South Africa, OECD Review of Vocational Education and Training (VET). OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyondschool/ASkillsBeyondSchoolReviewOfSouth Africa.pdf.

Fleisch, Brahm, Jennifer Shindler, and Helen Perry. 2012. “Who is out of school? Evidence from the statistics South Africa community survey.” International Journal of Educational Development 32(4): 529‒536.

Giroux, Henry. 2020. “Critical pedagogy”, 1‒16. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Hanushek, Eric A. and Ludger Woessmann. 2020. “Education, knowledge capital, and economic growth.” The Economics of Education (2020): 171‒182.

Hanushek, Eric A. and Steven G. Rivkin. 2012. “The distribution of teacher quality and implications for policy.” Annual Review Economics 4(1): 131‒157.

John, Victoria. 2012. “School book shortage a chronic issue in South Africa.” Mail and Guardian, Education section, 10 August.

Kotter, John. 1996. Leading change. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

Loiseau, Mélanie, Jonathan Cottenet, Sonia Bechraoui-Quantin, Séverine Gilard-Pioc, Yann Mikaeloff, Fabrice Jollant, Irène François-Purssell, et al. 2021. “Physical abuse of young children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Alarming increase in the relative frequency of hospitalizations during the lockdown period.” Child abuse & neglect 122: 105299.

Maringe, Felix, Otilia Chiramba, Craig Pournara, Nokhlunga Ndlovu, and Angie Magabane. 2020. The quality of home learning in low-income family households. A Zenex Foundation Learning Brief.

Morrow, Wally. 2009. Bounds of democracy: Epistemological access in higher education. Cape Town: HSRC Press.

OECD. 2005. “E-learning in tertiary education.” http://www.cumex.org. (Accessed 27 February 2014).

OECD. 2020. OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report March 2020. OECD Publishing.

Panchal, Nirmita, Rabah Kamal, Kendal Orgera, Cynthia Cox, Rachel Garfield, Liz Hamel, and Priya Chidambaram. 2020. “The implications of COVID-19 for mental health and substance use.” Kaiser family foundation 21.

Prebisch, Raúl. 1950. “Crecimiento, desequilibrio y disparidades: Interpretación del proceso de desarrollo económico.” En Estudio económico de América Latina, 1949-E/CN, 12/164/Rev. 1-1950, 3‒89.

Reimers, F. and A. Schleicher. 2020. “Schooling disrupted, schooling rethought. How the COVID-19 Pandemic is Changing Education.” (Accessed 14 December 2020).

Reyes, Giovanni. 2021. “Four Main theories of Development, modernization, dependency.” Sincronia Journal 4(2): 23‒43.

Ross, Norbert. 2002. “Cognitive aspects of intergenerational change: Mental models, cultural change, and environmental behavior among the Lacandon Maya of Southern Mexico.” Human Organization 61(2): 125‒138.

Statistics South Africa. 2019. “Mid-year population estimates 2019.” http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022019.pdf.

Stats SA see Statistics South Africa.

Tipps, D. 1976. Modenization Theory and the Comparative Study of Societies: A

critical perspective. New York: Free Press.

UNICEF. 2021. “UNICEF Effectiveness of digital learning solutions to improve educational outcomes. A review of the evidence working paper.” https://www.unicef.org/documents/effectiveness-digital-learning-solutions-improve-educational-outcomes.

Walerstein, Marcia. 1987. “Public rituals among the Jews from Cochin, India. Israel: Expressions of ethnic identity.” PhD dissertation, Los Angeles: University of California.

Wallmann, Johaness. 1987. “The Reception of Luther’s Writings on the Jews from the Reformation to the End of the 19th century.” Lutheran Quarterly n.s. 1(Spring 1987): 72–97.

Published
2022-08-16
How to Cite
Maringe, F., and O. Chiramba. 2022. “Disruptions in Higher Education: Mitigating Issues of Access and Success in the COVID-19 Pandemic”. South African Journal of Higher Education 36 (4), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-4-5382.
Section
Leading Article