Feat or futile: Students' perceptions of group work at a University of Technology in South Africa

  • I. Hall Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark
  • R. Erasmus Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark
  • C. Haywood Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark
Keywords: group work, students, university of technology (UoT), perceptions, conflict

Abstract

The increase in student enrolment at tertiary institutions in South Africa over the past few years has necessitated the need for group work without sacrificing the standard and integrity of education. Research has shown that group work offers many advantages to both lecturers and students. Interactive attributes such as teamwork, co-operation skills, leadership qualities, communication skills and confidentiality developed during group work are highly sought-after skills by prospective employers.

This quantitative study aimed to determine whether students are positively or negatively inclined towards group work, as well as other possible factors influencing group work at a university of technology (UoT) in South Africa. A structured, close-ended questionnaire was administered to 309 students enrolled for the Applied Communication Skills course. The data were analysed using statistical methods. The results revealed that listening skills and mutual respect were crucial to develop good interpersonal skills needed for effective group work. When working in groups, students tend towards collectivism and negative aspects of group work, such as social loafing, are often overseen to maintain harmony and avoid direct confrontation with other individuals in the group. It was also found that male students agreed more strongly with negative conflict resolution than female students. Overall, the study showed that despite several negative aspects, students tended to be positively inclined towards group work.

Author Biographies

I. Hall, Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark

Department of Tourism and Integrated Communication

R. Erasmus, Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark

Department of Tourism and Integrated Communication

C. Haywood, Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark

Department of Tourism and Integrated Communication

References

Amineh, Roya J. and D. Asl. Hanieh. 2015. “Review of constructivism and social constructivism.” Journal of Science, Literature and Languages 1(1): 9‒16.

Burdett, Jane. 2003. “Making groups work: University students’ perceptions.” International Education Journal 4(3): 177‒191.

Burke, Alison. 2011. “Group work: How to use groups effectively.” The Journal of Effective Teaching 11(2): 87‒95. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007768/. (Accessed 10 June 2021).

Chang, Yunjeong and Peggy Brickman. 2018. “When group work doesn’t work: Insights from students.” CBE‒Life Sciences Education 17(1): 1‒17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234829/. (Accessed 10 June 2021).

Chapman, Kenneth, J. and Stewart Van Auken. 2001. “Creating positive group project experiences: An examination of the role of the instructor on students’ perceptions of group projects.” Journal of Marketing Education 23(2): 117‒127.

Daba, Tolessa M., Sorale J. Ejersa, and Sultan Aliji. 2017. “Student perception on group work and group assignments in classroom teaching: The case of Bule Hora university second year biology students, South Ethiopia: An action research.” Educational Research and Reviews 12(17): 860‒866.

Field, Andy. 2018. Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th Edition. London: SAGE.

Hofstede, Geert. 1991. Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind. Berkshire: McGraw Hill.

Hofstede, Geert and Gert J. Hofstede. 2005. Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind. 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Li, Mingsheng and Jacqui Campbell. 2008. “Asian students’ perceptions of group work and group assignments in a New Zealand tertiary institution.” Intercultural Education 19(3): 203‒216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980802078525. (Accessed 19 October 2019).

Payne, Brian K. and Elizabeth Monk-Turner. 2006. “Students’ perceptions of group projects: The role of race, age and slacking.” College Student Journal 40(1): 132‒139.

Psychology. 2021. “Social loafing.” http://www.psychology.iresearchnet.com. (Accessed 1 March 2021).

Roopa, Siddegowda and M. S. Rani. 2012. “Questionnaire designing for a survey.” Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society 46(4): 273‒277.

State University. 2021. “Learning Theory: Constructivist Approach.” https://education.stateuniversity. com/pages/2174/Learning-theory.html. (Accessed 9 March 2021).

Sweet, Michael and Larry K. Michealsen. 2007. “How group dynamics research can inform the theory and practice of postsecondary small group learning.” Educational Psychology Review 19: 31‒47. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-006-9035-y. (Accessed 15 March 2021).

Thondlana, Gladman and Dina Belluigi. 2014. “Group work as ‘terrains of learning’ for students in South African higher education.” Perspectives in Education 32(4): 40‒44. http://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC164258. (Accessed 2 March 2021).

Walker, Ann. 2001. “British psychology students’ perceptions of group-work and peer assessment.” Psychology Learning and Teaching 1(1): 28‒36. https://doi.org./10.2304./plat.2001.1.1.28. (Accessed 2 March 2021).

Wilson, Kristie, J., Peggy Brickman, and Cynthia J. Brame. “Group work.” CBE‒Life Sciences Education 17(1): 1‒17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007768/. (Accessed 10 June 2021).

Published
2022-12-26
How to Cite
Hall, I., R. Erasmus, and C. Haywood. 2022. “Feat or Futile: Students’ Perceptions of Group Work at a University of Technology in South Africa”. South African Journal of Higher Education 36 (6), 231-51. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-6-4760.
Section
Part 2 : General