COVID-19: An alternative approach to postgraduate supervision in the digital age

  • R. Hendrickse University of the Western Cape, Cape Town
Keywords: research supervisors, research supervision models, online supervision, COVID-19, pedagogy of supervision

Abstract

Universities globally are facing enormous governmental pressure to increase postgraduate output, and in turn, contribute to the knowledge economy. This pressure is transferred to research supervisors, who have to navigate the complexities of research supervision to not only meet postgraduate output targets set by the university in particular, but postgraduate output targets set by government in general. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, research supervision mostly followed the traditional apprenticeship or group model approach to supervision, where engagement took the form of face-to-face interactions. With the COVID-19 pandemic came social distancing, which forced research supervision to move to online platforms. The core objective of this article was to peruse selected research supervision models or approaches to determine which model or approach would be most suited to an online supervision context, if any. This article advances a re-imagined view of research supervision in higher education. The author proposes an argument for an alternative approach to research supervision, most appropriate to the online supervision environment. The ontological stance, from the perspective of constructivism, underpinned the interrogation of selected research supervision models or approaches with the view to engender a different understanding of what the core components of a research supervision framework could be in the context of COVID-19, with due regard to the “pedagogy of supervision”. This article will be of value to emerging South African research supervisors and scholars in the higher education realm.

Author Biography

R. Hendrickse, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town

Division for Postgraduate Studies

References

Abiddin, N. Z., A. Ismail, and A. Ismail. 2011. “Effective supervisory approach in enhancing postgraduate research studies.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1(2): 206‒217.

Academy of Science of South Africa. 2010. “The PhD study: An evidence-based study on how to meet the demands for high-level skills in an emerging economy.” http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/assaf.2016/0026.

ASSAf see Academy of Science of South Africa.

Bitzer, E. M. and R. M. Albertyn. 2011. “Alternative approaches to postgraduate supervision: A planning tool to facilitate supervisory processes.” South African Journal of Higher Education 25(5): 874‒888.

Burnett, P. C. 1999. “The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model.” Counselor Education and Supervision 39(1): 46‒52. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1999.tb01789.x.

Cekiso, M., B. Tshotsho, R. Masha, and T. Saziwa. 2019. “Supervision experiences of postgraduate research students at one South African higher education institution.” South African Journal of Higher Education 33(3): 8‒25. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-3-2913.

Cumming, J. 2010. “Doctoral enterprise: A holistic conception of evolving practices and arrangements.” Studies in Higher Education 35(1): 25–39. https://doi:10.1080/03075070902825899.

Department of Education. 2001. “National Plan for Higher Education.” Government Gazette (22138), Notice 230, 9 March.

Department of Higher Education. 1997. “White Paper 3: A programme for the transformation of higher education.” Government Gazette (18207), 15 August.

Essop, A. 2020. “The changing size and shape of the higher education system in South Africa, 2005–2017.” Johannesburg: Ali Mazrui Centre for Higher Education Studies, University of Johannesburg. https://heltasa.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Size-and-Shape-of-the-HE-System-2005-2017.pdf.

Fataar, A. 2013. “A pedagogy of supervision: ‘knowledgeability’ through relational engagement.” Journal of Education 58: 111‒133.

Grant, K., R. Hackney, and D. Edgar. 2014. “Postgraduate research supervision: An ‘agreed’ conceptual view of good practice through derived metaphors.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 9: 43‒60.

Gray, A. n.d. “The road to knowledge is always under construction: A life history journey to constructivist teaching.” Unpublished Master degree thesis. Saskatchewan: University of Saskatchewan.

Grossman, E. S. and N. Crowther. 2015. “Co-supervision in postgraduate training: Ensuring the right hand knows what the left hand is doing.” South African Journal of Science 111: 1‒8.

Gumbo, A. 2020. “Reflecting on supervision experiences: Honours students’ research projects in development studies at the Nelson Mandela University.” South African Journal of Higher Education 34(2): 164‒176.

Hendrickse, R. 2015. “A public management perspective of postgraduate research supervision: Selected cases of universities of technology.” Administratio Publica 23(3): 7‒25.

Hutchings, M. 2017. “Improving doctoral support through group supervision: Analysing face-to-face and technology-mediated strategies for nurturing and sustaining scholarship.” Studies in Higher Education 42(3): 533‒550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1058352.

Imel, S. 2002. Adult learning in cohort groups: Practice application. Brief No. 24. Columbus, OH: Center on Education and Training for Employment, Ohio State University.

Kam, B. H. 1997. “Style and quality in research supervision: The supervisor dependency factor.” Higher Education 34(1): 81‒103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002946922952.

Kumar, S., V. Kumar, and S. Taylor. 2020. “A guide to online supervision. UK Council for Graduate Education.” https://supervision.ukcge.ac.uk/cms/wp-content/uploads/A-Guide-to-Online-Supervision-Kumar-Kumar-Taylor-UK-Council-for-Graduate-Education.pdf.

Lee, A. 2010. “New approaches to doctoral supervision: Implications for educational development.” Educational Developments 11(2): 18‒23.

Lessing, A. C. 2011. “The role of the supervisor in the supervisory process.” South African Journal of Higher Education 25(5): 921‒936.

Lessing, A. C. and S. Schulze. 2002. “Postgraduate supervision and academic support: Students’ perceptions.” South African Journal of Higher Education 16(2): 139‒149. http://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC36908.

Loureiro, M., I. Huet, A. Baptista, and D. Casanova. 2010. “Using ICT to enhance the online research supervision process.” Acta Academia Supplementum 1: 151‒174.

Lovitts, B. E. 2008. “The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn’t and why.” The Journal of Higher Education 79(3): 296‒325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772100.

Maistry, M. 2017. “Betwixt and between: Liminality and dissonance in developing threshold competences for research supervision in South Africa.” South African Journal of Higher Education 31(1): 119‒134. http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/31-1-841.

Manathunga, C. 2005. “The development of research supervision: ‘Turning the light on a private space’.” International Journal for Academic Development 10(1): 17‒30.

Maor, D. and J. K. Currie. 2017. “The use of technology in postgraduate supervision pedagogy in two Australian universities.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14(1): 1‒15. https://DOI 10.1186/s41239-017-0046-1.

Maor, D., J. D. Ensor, and B. J. Fraser. 2016. “Doctoral supervision in virtual spaces: A review of web-based tools to develop collaborative supervision.” Higher Education, Research and Development 35(1): 172‒188. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1121206.

Masembe, C. and M. Nakabugo. 2004. Supervisor¬–supervisee relationship: A rose without thorns? Kampala: Makerere University.

McCallin, A. and S. Nayar. 2012. “Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 17(1): 63‒74. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13562517.2011.590979.

McKenna, S. 2020. “National PG context.” YouTube video, 15:38. August 9. https://youtube.com/watch?v=RgWHTdqdDyU&t=306s.

Mhlahlo, A. 2020. “Reflecting on supervision experiences: Honours students’ research projects in development studies at the nelson Mandela University.” South African Journal of Higher Education 34(2): 164‒176. https://doi.org/10.20853/34-2-3565.

Mouton, J. 2001. How to succeed in your master’s and doctoral studies. A South African guide and resource book. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Muraraneza, C., F. Mtshali, and S. Z. Mthembu. 2016. “Research supervision: Perceptions of postgraduate nursing students at a higher education institution in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.” African Journal of Health Professions Education 8(2): 135‒139. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.2016.v8i2.294.

Nacenta, M. 2020. “Postgraduate supervision in the COVID19 era (for supervisors and students).” Miguel’s space (blog), March 25. http://nacenta.com/2020/03/25/postgraduate-supervision-in-the-covid19-era-for-supervisors-and-students.

National Planning Commission. 2011. National Development Plan. Pretoria: National Planning Commission.

Northouse, P. G. 2010. Leadership: Theory and practice. 5th Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Pearson, M. and C. Kayrooz. 2004. Enabling critical reflection on research supervisory practice. International Journal for Academic Development 9(1):99‒116. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/1360144042000296107.

Phillips, E. M. and D. S. Pugh. 2000. How to get a PhD: A handbook for supervisors and their students. 3rd Edition. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Qureshi, R. and N. Vazir. 2016. Pedagory of research supervision pedagogy: A constructivist model. Research in Pedagogy 4(2): 95‒110. http://doi.org/10.17810/2015.38.

Robertson, J. 2009. Coaching educational leadership: Building leadership capacity through partnership. London: Sage.

Sefotho, M. M. 2018. “Carving a career identity as PhD supervisor: A South African autoethnographic case study.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 13: 539‒555. https://doi.org/10.28945/4159.

Swartz, R., M. Ivancheva, L. Czerniewics, and N. P Morris. 2019. “Between a rock and a hard place: Dilemmas regarding the purpose of public universities in South Africa.” Higher Education 77: 567‒583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0291-9.

Symonds, J. 2009. “Important themes in postgraduate research supervision and examination for communities of practice.” 20th Australasian conference on Information Systems. 2‒4 December. Melbourne.

Valentino, A. L., L. A. LeBlanc, and T. P. Sellers. 2016. “The benefits of group supervision and a recommended structure for implementation.” Behavior Analysis in Practice 9(4): 320‒328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0138-8.

Warhurst, R. P. 2006. “‘We really felt part of something’: Participatory learning amongst peers within a university teaching development community of practice.” International Journal for Academic Development 11(2): 111‒122.

Wisker, G., G. Robinson, and M. Shacham. 2007. “Postgraduate research success: Communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities.” Innovation in Education and Teaching International 44(3): 301‒320. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14703290701486720.

Wood, L. and I. Louw. 2018. Reconsidering postgraduate “supervision” from a participatory action learning and action research approach. South African Journal of Higher Education 32(4): 284‒297. http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/32-4-2562.

Zaheer, M. and S. Munir. 2020. “Research supervision in distance learning: Issues and challenges.” Asian Association of Open Universities Journal 15(1): 131‒143. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2020-0003.

Published
2022-11-19
How to Cite
Hendrickse, R. 2022. “COVID-19: An Alternative Approach to Postgraduate Supervision in the Digital Age”. South African Journal of Higher Education 36 (5), 98-118. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-5-4554.
Section
General Articles