Slow scholarship in writing retreats: A diffractive methodology for response-able pedagogies

  • V. Bozalek University of the Western Cape

Abstract

The corporatization of universities has led to increasing pressure on academics to publish as quickly and prolifically as possible. Writing retreats have been used as one way of ensuring the production of academic papers by providing spaces for academics to write, and pressurizing them to publish shortly thereafter. This paper provides an alternative way of viewing and conducting writing retreats – that of Slow scholarship, which foregrounds attentiveness, care, thoughtfulness and quality rather than quantity and production. A ‘response-able’ pedagogy is suggested as a way of enacting a Slow scholarship, using a diffractive methodology for reading and writing and responding to peers’ writing at writing retreats. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

V. Bozalek, University of the Western Cape
Professor and Director of Teaching and Learning

References

Alaimo, S. 2016. Environmental politics and pleasure in posthuman times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

Berg, M. and Seeber, B.K. 2016. The slow professor: Challenging the culture of speed in the academy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Bozalek, V., Mitchell, V., Dison, A. and Alperstein, M. 2016. A Diffractive Reading of Dialogical Feedback through the Political Ethics of Care. Teaching in Higher Education 21(7):825-838.

Braidotti, R. 2013. The posthuman, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Trans. and foreword by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

Dolphijn, R. and van der Tuin, I. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews and cartographies. University of Michigan Library: Open Humanities Press.

Gale, K., Martin, V., Sakellariadis, A., Speedy, J. and Spry, T. 2012. Collaborative Writing in real time. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 12 (5): 401–7.

Garey, A., R. Hertz and M.K. Nelson (eds). 2014. Open to disruption: Time and craft in the practice of Slow sociology. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Grandia, L. 2015. Slow ethnography: A hut with a view. Critique of Anthropology 35 (3): 301-17.

Grant, B. 2006. Writing in the company of other women: Exceeding the boundaries. Studies in Higher Education 33 (4): 483-95.

Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Haraway, D. 2000. How like a leaf: An interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York and London: Routledge.

Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium: FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.

Hartman, Y. and Darab, S. 2012. A call for Slow scholarship: A case study on the intensification of academic life and its implications for pedagogy. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 34 (1-2): 49-60.

Juelskjaer, M. and Schwennesen, N. 2012. Intra-active entanglements: An interview with Karen Barad. Kvinder, Koen og Forskning. 21 (1-2): 10-23.

Juelskjær, M. and Staunæs, D. 2016. Orchestrating intensities and rhythms: How Post-Psychologies are assisting new educational standards and reforming subjectivities. Theory and Psychology 26 (2): 182-201.

Kamler, B. and Thomson, P. 2014. Helping doctoral students to write: Pedagogies for supervision. London and New York: Routledge.

Knowles, S. and Grant, B. 2014. Walking the labyrinth: The holding embrace of academic writing retreats. In C. Aitchison and C. Guerin, eds. Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond, 110-127, London and New York: Routledge.

Kornhaber, R., Cross, M., Betihavas, V. and Bridgman, H. 2016. The benefits and challenges of academic writing retreats: An integrative review. Higher Education Research and Development, DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2016.1144572.

Latour, B. 2004, ‘Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern’, Critical Inquiry 30:225–248.

Martell, L. 2014. The slow university: Inequality, power and alternatives. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 15 (3), accessed 10 October 2016, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2223/3692/

Massumi, Brian. 2015. Politics of affect. Cambridge: Polity.

McGrail , M., Rickard, C.M. and Jones, R. 2006. Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates, Higher Education Research and Development, 25: 1, 19-35, DOI: 10.1080/07294360500453053.

Moore, S. 2003. Writers’ retreats for academics: Exploring and increasing the motivation to write. Journal of Further and Higher Education 27 (3): 333-42.

Mountz, A., Bonds, A., Mansfield, B. Loyd, J., Hyndman, J., Walton-Roberts, M., Basu, R., Whitson, R., Hawkins, R., Hamilton, T. and Curran, W. 2015. For Slow scholarship: A feminist politics of resistance through collective action in the neoliberal university. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 14 (4): 1235-1259.

Murray, R. 2015. Writing in social spaces: A social processes approach to academic writing. London & New York: Routledge.

Murray, R. and Moore, S. 2006. The handbook of academic writing: A fresh approach. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Nairn, K., Cameron, J., Anakin, M., Juntrasook, A., Wass, R., Sligo, J. and Morrison, C. 2015. Negotiating the challenge of collaborative writing: Learning from one writing group's mutiny. Higher Education Research and Development, 34: 3, 596-608, DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2014.973383.

Nelson, M. K. and Hertz, R. 2014. On being open to disruption. In A. Garey, R. Hertz and M.K. Nelson, eds. Open to disruption: Time and craft in the practice of Slow sociology. 1-18. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Paré, A. 2010. Slow the presses: Concerns about premature publication. In C. Aitchison, B. Kamler and A. Lee, eds. Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond: 30-46, London and New York: Routledge.

Parkins, W. and Craig, G. 2006. Slow living. Oxford: Berg.

Pensoneau-Conway, S.L., Bolen, D.M., Toyosaki, S., Rudick, C.K. and Bolen, E.K. 2014. Self, relationship, positionality, and politics: A community autoethnographic inquiry into collaborative writing. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 14 (4): 312-23.

Poirier, E. and Robinson, L. 2014. Slow Delphi: An investigation into information behaviour and the Slow movement. Journal of Information Science and Engineering 40 (1): 88-96.

Rosser, S., Rugg, D.L. and Ross, M.W. 2001. Increasing research and evaluation productivity: Tips for successful writing retreats. Health Promotion Practice 2 (1): 9-13.

Shahjahan, R. A. 2015. Being ‘lazy’ and slowing down: Toward decolonizing time, our body, and pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (5): 488-501.

Silk, M., Francombe-Webb, J., Rich, E. and Merchant, S. 2015. On the transgressive possibilities of physical pedagogic practices. Qualitative Inquiry: QI 21 (9): 798-811.

Stengers, I. 2011. ‘Another science is possible!’ A plea for Slow science. Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres, ULB, Inaugural lecture; Chair Willy Calewaert 2011-2012 (VUB).

Stengers, I. 2005. Deleuze and Guattari’s last enigmatic message. Angelaki 10 (2): 151–167.

Tabulawa, R. 2016. On inter-disciplinarity as political technology: How academics find themselves between a rock and a hard place. Keynote address at the South African Education Research Association, Cape Town, 23-26 October 2016.

Truman, S. 2016. Intratextual entanglements: Emergent pedagogies and the productive potential of texts. In N. Snaza, D. Sonu, S.E. Truman, and Z. Zaliwska, eds. Pedagogical matters: New materialisms and curriculum studies, 91-108, New York: Peter Lang.

Ulmer, J.B. 2016. Writing slow ontology. Qualitative Inquiry, ahead of print 1-1.

Published
2017-04-23
How to Cite
Bozalek, V. 2017. “Slow Scholarship in Writing Retreats: A Diffractive Methodology for Response-Able Pedagogies”. South African Journal of Higher Education 31 (2), 40-57. https://doi.org/10.20853/31-2-1344.
Section
Special Section