Bottle Fermented Sparkling Wine: Cork or Crown Closures During the Second Fermentation?

  • N. Jolly Post-harvest and Agro-processing TechnologiesARC Infruitec-NietvoorbijStellenboschSouth Africa
  • P. Minnaar
  • M. Booyse
  • P. Gerber


Bottle-fermented sparkling wine producers are continuously striving to increase quality and produce
niche products. One production tool that could be used is a cork closure instead of a crown cap closure
during the second fermentation and maturation on yeast lees. Anecdotal evidence suggests that this
leads to stylistic differences in the wine. Six pairs of South African bottle-fermented sparkling wines
(Méthode Cap Classique), closed by either a cork or crown cap, were investigated. Analyses included
bottle pressure, infrared spectroscopy, phenolic acids, sensory attributes and CO2 kinetics. Generally,
there were differences between the cork-closed and crown-capped wines. Cork-closed wines tended to
have lower pressure compared to crown-capped wines, albeit still well within legal requirements. Other
differences were evident in the infrared spectral data and in the polyphenol profile of the analysed wines.
Levels of gallic, caftaric, caffeic and p-coumaric acids could be used collectively as marker compounds to
differentiate between cork-closed and crown-capped wines. The effect of the cork was also evident in the
sensory attributes and CO2 kinetics. Cork-closed wines were judged to have smaller bubbles and a longer
aftertaste. It was also shown that the cork-closed wines tended to lose CO2 from the glass slower after being
poured than their crown-capped counterparts. The data tentatively support the anecdotal evidence that
cork can be used during the second fermentation and maturation on the yeast lees to change the style of
bottle-fermented sparkling wine.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

P. Minnaar

Post-Harvest and Agro-Processing Technologies, ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Agricultural Research Council

M. Booyse

Agricultural Research Council, Biometry

P. Gerber

Colmant Cap Classique & Champagne, Franschhoek


Alexi, N., Nanoub, E., Lazoc, O., Guerreroc, L., Grigorakism K. & Byrnea, D.V., 2018. Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) with semi-trained assessors: Sensory profiles closer to descriptive analysis or consumer elicited data? Food Qual. Pref. 64, 11-20.

Anonymous, 2002. Methods of analyses for wine laboratories. South African Wine Laboratories Association (SAWLA). HEH Signs, Bellville.

Anonymous, 2020. From Vine to wine: effervescence – Three centuries of research. Comité interprofessionne du vin de Champagne. Accessed 17 December 2020.

Azevedo, J. Fernandes, I., Lopes, P., Roseira, I., Cabral, M., Mateus, N. & Freita, V., 2014. Migration of phenolic compounds from different cork stoppers to wine model solutions: antioxidant and biological relevance. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 239, 951-960.

Comité Interprofessionnel du vin de Champagne.

(accessed 30 November 2020).

Di Gaspero, M., Ruzza, P., Hussain, R., Honisch, C., Biondi, B., Siligardi, G., Marangon, M., Curioni, A. & Vincenzi, S., 2020. The secondary structure of a major wine protein is modified upon interaction with polyphenols. Molecules, 25, 1646. doi: 10.3390/molecules25071646

Fernandes, A., Fernandes, I., Cruz, L., Mateus, N., Cabral, M. & De Freitas, V., 2009. Antioxidant and biological properties of bioactive phenolic compounds from Quercus suber L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57, 11154-11160.

Feuillat, M. & Charpentier, C., 1982. Autolysis of yeasts in Champagne. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 33, 6-13.

Gabrielli, M., Fracassetti, D. & Tirelli, A., 2016. Release of phenolic compounds from cork stoppers and its effect on protein-haze. Food Control 62, 330-336.

Geissmann, Q., 2013. OpenCFU, a new free and open-source software to count cell colonies and other circular objects. PLoS ONE 8, e54072.

Hornedo-Ortega, R., González-Centeno, M.R., Chira, K., Jourdes, M. & Teissedre, P.-L., 2020. Phenolic compounds of grapes and wines: key compounds and implications in sensory perception [Online First], IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93127.

Jaeger, S.R., Beresford, M.K., Paisley, A.G., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Cadena, R.S., Giménez, A. & Ares, G., 2015. Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization by consumers: Investigations into the number of terms used in CATA questions. Food Quality Pref. 42, 154-164.

Liger-Belair, G., Lemaresquier, H., Robillard, B., Duteurtre, B. & Jeandet, P., 2001. The secrets of fizz in Champagne wines: a phenomenological study. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 52, 88-92.

Liger-Belair, G., Villaume, S., Cilindre, C. & Jeandet, P., 2009. Kinetics of CO2 fluxes outgassing from Champagne glasses in tasting conditions: the role of temperature. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 1997-2003.

Liger-Belair, G., Parmentier, M. & Cilindre, C., 2012. More on the losses of dissolved CO2 during Champagne serving: toward a multiparameter modelling. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60, 11777-11786.

Mazzoleni, V., Caldentey, P. & Silva, A., 1998. Phenolic compounds in cork used for production of wine stoppers as affected by storage and boiling of cork slabs. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 49, 6-10.

Minnaar, P.P., Jolly, N.P., Paulsen, V., Du Plessis, H.W. & Van Der Rijst, M., 2017. Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts in sequential fermentations: effect on phenolic acids of fermented Kei-Apple (Dovyalis caffra L.) juice. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 257, 232-237.

Minnaar, P.P., Nyobo, L., Jolly, N., Ntushelo, N. & Meiring, S., 2018. Anthocyanins and polyphenols in Cabernet Franc wines produced with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Torulaspora delbrueckii yeast strains: spectrophotometric analysis and effect on selected sensory attributes. Food Chem. 268, 287-291.

Minnaar, P.P., Gerber, P., Booyse, M. & Jolly, N., 2021. Phenolic acids in cork-closed bottle-fermented sparkling wines. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. (accepted for publication).

Monagas, M., Bartlomé, B. & Gómez-Cordovés, C., 2005. Updated knowledge about the presence of phenolic compounds in wine. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutri. 45, 85–118.

DOI: 10.1080/10408690490911710

Ott, R.L. & Longnecker, M., 2016. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning. 7th Edition. Belmont, US. pp. 445-481.

Pinto, J., Oliveira, A.S., Lopes, P., Roseira, I., Cabral, M., de Lourdes-Bastos, M. & Guedes de Pinho, P., 2019. Characterisation of chemical compounds susceptible to be extracted from cork by the wine using GC-MS and 1H NMR metabolomics approaches. Food Chem. 271, 639-649.

Shapiro, S.S. & Wilk, M.B., 1965. An analysis of Variance Test for Normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591-611.

Tao, Y., García, J.F. & Sun, D-W., 2014. Advances in wine aging technologies for enhancing wine quality and accelerating wine aging process. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 54, 817-835.

DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2011.609949

Varea, S., García-Vallejo, M., Cadahía, E. & de Simón, F.B., 2001. Polyphenols susceptible to migrate from cork stoppers to wine. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 213, 56-61.


Most read articles by the same author(s)