Comparing Irrigation Systems and Strategies for Table Grapes in the Weathered Granite-gneiss Soils of the Lower Orange River Region
Abstract
Drip and micro-sprinkler irrigation systems were compared in a Thompson Seedless/Ramsey tablegrape vineyard in a weathered granite-gneiss soil in the Lower Orange River region. For each system,
two different irrigation strategies were investigated. Drip irrigation frequencies of two days or longer,
induced more water constraints in grapevines compared to micro-sprinkler irrigation applied at the same
frequencies in the 1996/97 and 1997/98 seasons. Higher water constraints imposed by drip irrigation had
negative effects on vegetative growth, berry size and grape quality compared to micro-sprinkler irrigation.
However, responses of drip irrigated grapevines were comparable to micro-sprinkler irrigated grapevines
when drip irrigations were applied daily in the 1998/99 and 1999/2000 seasons. Daily, early morning drip
irrigation increased evapotranspiration (ET) by 6% compared to drip during the warmest part of the
day. Drip irrigation suppressed weed growth considerably compared to micro-sprinklers. Daily ET of the
drip irrigated grapevines was substantially lower compared to micro-sprinkler irrigated grapevines that
received either two or three irrigations per week. In the case of micro-sprinklers, the higher frequency
increased ET by 8% compared to the lower irrigation frequency. Since micro-sprinkler irrigation
invariably produced higher yields than drip irrigation during the four seasons, it should be the preferred
system for irrigation of table grapes under the given atmospheric and soil conditions. If water resources
are limited, or if high water cost reduces table grape profitability, drip irrigation merits consideration
as an alternative. However, daily drip irrigation will be required during the growing season to maintain
acceptable yields and grape quality.
Downloads
A copyright form will be e-mailed to the corresponding author when the manuscript has been accepted for publication.
In principle, the Author agrees to the following when he/she signes the copyright agreement:
I hereby assign to the SOUTH AFRICAN SOCIETY FOR ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE (SASEV) the copyright of the text, tables, figures, supplementary material, illustrations and other information (the Material) submitted with the manuscript to be published in SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE (SAJEV) (the "Article"). The copyright becomes effective from the date the Article has been accepted for publication in SAJEV.
This is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Author's may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal webpage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJEV, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX - XXX, DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (www.journals.ac.za/index.php/sajev/) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University's Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0