The student voice as contributor to quality education through institutional design
Abstract
The inclusion of students’ voices in different aspects of quality has evolved over the years. Consequently, students take on different roles – ranging from providing feedback on their educational experiences, to actively participating or even leading change initiatives. In making claims for different ways of conceptualising or including students’ voices, the literature often criticises some forms of engagement with student voices in favour of another. This article is based on the premise that the complexity of quality outcomes in higher education needs to be complemented by a variety of inputs from students. By drawing from examples of two high-impact practices from the University of the Free State, the article further argues for using different forms of student voices to inform how we design institutional support structures to ultimately enhance the quality of students’ educational experiences. At its core, this cyclical interaction between students’ voices and institutional design revolves around evidence – thereby contributing to the quality of educational outcomes, and ultimately students’ success.
References
Barnett, R. 1994. Power, enlightenment and quality evaluation. European Journal of Education 29(2): 165‒179.
Brooman, S., S. Darwent and A. Pimor. 2015. The student voice in higher education curriculum design: Is there value in listening? Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52(6): 663‒674.
Canning, J. 2017. Conceptualising student voice in UK higher education: four theoretical lenses. Teaching in Higher Education 22(5): 519‒531.
Centre for Teaching and Learning. 2018. Creating pathways for student success: Academic advising and student engagement. UFS: CTL.
Centre for Teaching and Learning. 2019. Creating pathways for student success: Peer learning, engagement and success. UFS: CTL.
CHE see Council on Higher Education.
Cloete, N. 2016. Free higher education: Another self-destructive South African policy. Centre for Higher Education Trust. https://www.chet.org.za/files/Higher%20education%20and%20Self%20 destructive%20policies%2030%20Jan%2016.pdf (Accessed January 2020).
Costello, P. J. M. 2003. Action research. London: Continuum.
Council on Higher Education. 2014. Framework for institutional quality enhancement in the second period of quality assurance. Pretoria: CHE.
Council on Higher Education. 2015. Content analysis of the baseline institutional submissions for phase 1 of the Quality Enhancement Project. Pretoria: CHE.
CTL see Centre for Teaching and Learning.
Department of Higher Education and Training. 2018. A National Framework for Enhancing Academics as University Teachers. Pretoria: DHET.
Department of Higher Education and Training. 2019a. Statistics on Post-School Education and Training in South Africa 2017. Pretoria: DHET.
Department of Higher Education and Training. 2019b. 2000 to 2016 First time entering undergraduate cohort studies for public higher education institutions. Pretoria: DHET.
Dos Reis, K. M. and D. Yu. 2018. Peer mentoring: Enhancing economics first years’ academic performance. South African Journal of Higher Education 32(6): 234‒250.
Dunne, E. and R. Zandstra. 2011. Students as change agents: New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol, ESCalate.
Fomunyam, K. G. 2016. Theorising student constructions of quality education in a South African university. Southern African Review of Education 22: 46‒63.
Hall, V. 2017. A tale of two narratives: Student voice – what lies before us? Oxford Review of Education 43(2): 180‒193.
Hazelkorn, E., H. Coates and A. C. McCormick. 2018. Research handbook on quality, performance and accountability in higher education. Northampton. MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Klemenčič, M. and I. Chirikov. 2015. “How do we know how students experience higher education? On the use of student surveys.” In The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies, ed. A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi and P. Scott. London: Springer.
Knoesen, R. and L. Naude. 2017. Experiences of flourishing and languishing during the first year at university. Journal of Mental Health 27(3): 269‒278.
Kuh, G. D. 2008. High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Layton, D. M. 2015. The role of the tutorial system in enabling students’ academic success. South African Journal of Higher Education 29(4): 198‒210.
Makala, Q. 2017. Peer-assisted learning programme: Supporting students in high-risk subjects at the Mechanical Engineering Department at Walter Sisulu University. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa 5(2): 17‒31.
Manik, S. 2015. As a person you need help every now and then: Accessing students’ support needs in a higher education environment. South African Journal of Higher Education 29(3): 101‒117.
Masehela, L. M. and M. Mabika. 2017. An assessment of the impact of the Mentoring Programme on student performance. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa 5(2): 163‒182.
Mayet, R. 2016. Supporting at-risk learners at a comprehensive university in South Africa. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa 4(2): 1‒12.
McGhie, V. and M. du Preez. 2015. Addressing the learning needs of at-risk students at the University of the Western Cape. South African Journal of Higher Education 29(1): 164‒180.
McKay, T. M. 2016. Do tutors matter? Assessing the impact of tutors on first-year academic performance at a South African university. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa 4(1): 53‒64.
Mudehwe-Gonhovi, F. R., G. Galloway, and G. Moyo. 2018. Dialogic pedagogical innovation: Creating liberating learning practices for first year university students. South African Journal of Higher Education 32(5): 140‒157.
Ndebele, T. 2017. “Education.” In South Africa Survey 2017, ed. F. Cronje and T. Ndebele. South African Institute of Race Relations: Johannesburg.
Nel, L. 2017. Students as collaborators in creating meaningful learning experiences in technology-enhanced classrooms: An engaged scholarship approach. British Journal of Educational Technology 48(5): 1131‒1142.
Nielsen, G. B. 2019. Radically democratising education? New student movements, equality and engagement in common, yet plural, worlds. Research in Education 103(1): 85‒100.
OECD see Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2017. Getting skills right: Skills for jobs indicators. OECD Publishing.
Reddy, V., M. Rogan, B. Mncwango and S. Chabane. 2017. Occupations in high demand in South Africa: A Technical Report. Pretoria: Labour Market Intelligence Partnership.
Republic of South Africa. 1997. Higher Education Act of 1997. https://www.gov.za/documents/higher-education-act (Accessed January 2020).
Seale, J. 2016. How can we confidently judge the extent to which student voice in higher education has been genuinely amplified? A proposal for a new evaluation framework. Research Papers in Education 31(2): 212‒233.
Shah, M., M. Cheng and R. Fitzgerald. 2017. Closing the loop on student feedback: The case of Australian and Scottish universities. Higher Education 74: 115‒129.
Statistics South Africa. 2019. Youth graduate unemployment rate increases in Q1: 2019. http://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=12121 (Accessed March 2020).
Stuurman, S. 2018. Student activism in a time of crisis in South Africa: The quest for “black power”. South African Journal of Education 38(4). DOI: 10.15700/saje.v38n4a1704.
Waghid, Y. 2019. Quality, dissonance and rhythm within higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education 33(3): 107.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
