Analysing a discussion on an online university forum: A communicative approach to discursive democracy

L. Postma

Abstract


This paper explores academics’ interaction in an online forum, where perceptions of racism are debated. The communicative model of democratic discourse directs the interpretation of an emancipatory discursive interaction, following a deductive textual analysis of the forum and interview texts from selected participants. The communicative model discourages normative judgements of others and focuses on an understanding of difference. The findings indicate that participants who engage in a deliberative demonstration of power, do not appreciate diverse social-historical contexts. Discursive interactions which indicate an understanding of participants’ contexts are marked by a mitigating and sympathetic approach which allows for doubt in the judgements of participants. These mitigating interactions do however not persuade all participants to critically reflect on limiting opinions, attitudes and ways of interaction. An online curator who invites participants from diverse contexts might make the discourse more nuanced, create the opportunity to understand multiple realities and facilitate a transformative discussion.


Keywords


communication, discursive democracy, emancipation, narratives, online discourse, online forum, social-historical context, transformation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the self. New York: Routledge.

Habermas, J. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume Two: Lifeworld and Systems: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. 1990a. "Discourse ethics: notes on a program of philosophical justification." In The Communicative Ethics Controversy, edited by S Benhabib and F Dallmayr, 60-110. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Habermas, J. 1990b. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

Habermas, J. 1993. Justification and application: remarks on discourse ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Mangum, G. 2015. Building a better chat room. Comparative Media Studies.

Mezirow, J. n.d. "Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning." accessed 16 August 2017.

Thorseth, M. 2008. "Reflective judgement and enlarged thinking online." Ethics and Information Technology 10:221-231.

Vannini, A. 2009. Interpretive theory. In Encyclopedia of communicative theory, edited by S.W Littlejohn and K.A. Foss. Los Angeles: Sage.

Young, Iris Marion. 1990. "Justice and the politics of difference." In. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Young, Iris Marion. 1996. "Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy." In Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political, edited by S Benhabib, 120-135. Princeton, N. J: Princeton University Press.

Young, Iris Marion. 1997. Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Young, Iris Marion. 2001. "Comments on Seyla Benhabib, situating the self." New German Critique 62:165-172.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/33-2-2852

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


eISSN: 1753-5913

Copyright © 2016 South African Journal of Higher Education

Hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2016.

Creative Commons License -CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Disclaimer:
This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.