Students’ reflection on co-design: A cross-disciplinary collaboration between two SADC countries

K.J. Mchunu, S. Moodley

Abstract


This reflective article responds to the question: “What values and lessons can be gained from co-design in a culturally and disciplinarily diverse cross-university student project?” The Polar Project is regarded as just such an initiative and was intended to boost innovative product development across fields of study between two higher education institutions (HEIs) located in Southern African Development Community (SADC) region countries.

As lecturers, facilitators and mentors, the article’s authors adopted a qualitative and interpretive approach for analysing student “reflections-in-action”, using both reports and reflective questionnaires during the project’s co-design process. We formulated our own analysis methods for the process of critical reflection, based on Schön’s (1987) “reflection-on-action” model, to establish a way forward for the project. Through these reflections, the following critical themes were identified: (1) rewards for cross-cultural exchange; (2) multiple appreciations for collaboration; and (3) communication and miscommunication in cross-disciplinary groups.

These themes provide an account of the practical implications for extracurricular activities geared towards the agenda of internationalising higher educational practices, such as those applied in conducting this project. The contribution we hope to make is that, as HEIs enter onto internationalisation agendas, the voices and experiences of students should be recognised if, as important beneficiaries of the university system, they are to be properly considered.


Keywords


Co-design, reflection-in-action, reflection-on-action, student voice, internationalisation of higher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bannon, L. J., and P. Ehn. 2012. “Design Matters in Participatory Design.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 37-63. London: Routledge.

Burch, V. C., J. Lewis, U. Subramaney, A. Katurura, G. Quinot, S. Singh, and R.

Dhunpath. 2016. “Innovative Approaches for Enhancing the 21st Century Student Experience.” Alternation 23(1): 62-89. http://alternation.ukzn.ac.za/

Files/docs/23.1/23,1.pdf

Çimer, A., S. O. Çimer, and G. Vekli. S 2013. “How Does Reflection Help Teachers to

Become Effective Teachers?” International Journal of Educational Research

(4): 132-149. http://ijsse.com/ijer/sites/default/files/papers/2013/v1i4/Paper- 1.pdf

Clandinin, D. J., and F. M. Connelly. 1986. “The reflective practitioner and

practitioners' narrative unities.” Canadian Journal of Education 11(2): 184-198. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1494806.pdf

Coates, H, P. Kelly, R. Naylor, and V. Borden. 2016. “Innovative Approaches for

Enhancing the 21st Century Student Experience.” Alternation 23(1): 62-89. http://alternation.ukzn.ac.za/Files/docs/23.1/04%20Coates%20F.pdf

Court, D. 1988. “Reflection-in-action: Some definitional problems.” In Reflection in

Teacher Education edited by P. Grimmett and G. Erickson, 143-146. Vancouver, BC: Pacific Education Press, New York: Teachers College Press.

Dahl, R. 1964. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc.

Day, C. 1999. Developing Teachers: The Challenge of Lifelong Learning. London:

Falmer Press.

Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.

Dörner, N, F. Morhart, O. Gassmann, and T. Tomczak. 2011. “Inter-institutional

Collaboration for New Integrative Teaching programs.” On the Horizon 19(3): 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121111163922

Edwards, S. 2017. “Reflecting differently. New dimensions: reflection-before-action

and reflection-beyond-action.” International Practice Development Journal 7(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.71.002

Freire, P. 2005. Pedagogy of the Oppressed: 30th Anniversary Edition. New York:

Continuum.

Garutsa, T.C., and P. M. Mahlangu. 2014. “Using transdisciplinarity in the university:

Giving a voice to the voiceless in the grounding program at Fort Hare, TD.” The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 10(3): 310-322. https://dspace.nwu.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10394/12876/02a%20Garutsi%20%26%20Mahlangu.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Hagenmeier, C. C. A., A. Lansink, and G. Vukor-Quarshie. 2017. “Internationalisation

and African intellectual métissage: Capacity-enhancement through higher education in Africa.” South African Journal of Higher Education 31(1): 81-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/31-1-821

Higgins, C. (2011). The good life of teaching: An ethic of professional practice. Oxford:

Wiley-Blackwell

Jordan, S., and R. Adams. 2016. “Perceptions of success in virtual cross-disciplinary

design teams in large multinational corporations.” CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 12(3): 185-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2016.1146303

Kensing, F., and J. Greenbaum. 2012. “Heritage: Having a Say.” In Routledge

International Handbook of Participatory Design edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 21-36. London: Routledge.

King, S., J. Drummond, E. Hughes, S. Bookhalter, D. Huffman, and Ansell, D. 2013.

“An Inter-institutional collaboration: Transforming Education through Interprofessional Simulations.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 27(5): 429-431. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/13561820.2013.791260?

scroll=top&needAccess=true

Kleinsmann, M. S., A. C. Valkenburg, and J. A. Buijs. 2007. “Why do(n’t) actors in

collaborative design understand each other? An empirical study towards a better understanding of collaborative design.” CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 3(1): 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/

Mafundikwa, S. 2004. Afrikan Alphabets: The story of writing in Afrika. New York: Mark

Batty Publisher

Martinez-Canãs, R., P. Ruiz-Palomino, and J. J. Blázquez-Resino. 2016. Consumer

“Participation in CoCreation: An Enlightening Model of Causes and Effects based on ethical values and transcendent motives.” Frontiers in Psychology 7(793): 1-17. http://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00793

Mchunu, K and Berman, K. 2018 (upcoming). Arts-based methods as tools for co-

design in a South African community-based design co-operative. Cubic Journal.

Mundy, H. 1989. “Reflection-in-action and Reflection-on-action.” Education and

Culture: The Journal of the John Dewey Society 9(1): 31-41. https://docs.lib.

purdue.edu/eandc/vol09/iss1/art4/

Pedersen, J. 2016. “War and Peace in CoDesign.” CoDesign: International Journal of

CoCreation in Design and the Arts 12(3): 171-184. http://dx.doi.org/

1080/15710882.2015.1112813

Prahalad, C. K, and V. Ramaswamy. 2004. “Co-creating Unique Value with

Customers.” Strategy and Leadership 32(3): 4-9. http://doi.org/10.1108/

Quayle, M and Paterson, D. 1989. “Techniques for Encouraging Reflection in Design.”

Journal of Architectural Education 42(2): 30-42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1425089

Sanders, E. B. N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the New Landscapes

of Design.” CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 4(1): 5-18. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/

?needAccess=true

Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.

New York: Basic Books.

Schön, D. A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for

Teaching and Learning in the Professions. London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Sen, A. 2005. The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian History, Culture and

Identity. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Seppä, M. and S. Tanev. 2011. “The Future of CoCreation.” Technology Innovation

Management Review 6-12. https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/40172/futureofcocreation.pdf?sequence=1

Spinuzzi, C. 2005. “The Methodology of Participatory Design.” Technical

Communication. 52(2): 163-174. www.jstor.org/stable/43089196

Steen, M. 2013. “Codesign as a Process of Joint.” Inquiry and Imagination 29(2): 16-

http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/DESI_a_00207

Sultana, F. 2007. “Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating

Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research.” ACME: An International E-Journal of Critical Geographies 6(3): 374-385. http://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/786/2524/1/SM/pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/33-2-2829

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


eISSN: 1753-5913

Copyright © 2016 South African Journal of Higher Education

Hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2016.

Creative Commons License -CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Disclaimer:
This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.