Issues of authorship threatening research integrity: Pointers for ethical publication practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20853/39-5-6611Keywords:
Acadenic misconduct, Professional writers, Ghostwriting, Authorship, Research Integrity, PublicationAbstract
Publication imperatives have insidious consequences resulting in academic misconduct and “ghostly” authorship practices. If not exposed, these behaviours threaten research integrity and credibility in higher education. This article explores the systemic forces spawning gaming practices regarding the incentives in the neoliberal era and the implications for science. An investigation of ethical publication practice information was conducted by analysing the author guidelines of the 163 journals where academics in the largest faculty at a research-intensive university published articles in 2022. Findings reveal the issues where guidelines are not consistently clear and information not easily accessible. Guidelines for ethical publication practices regarding journal guidelines for authors, collegial discussion, research integrity education, and author support could contribute to constructively navigating the pressures associated with ethical publication.
Downloads
References
Academy of Management 2023. “Code of Ethics.” https://aom.org/about-aom/ethics/code-of-ethics (Accessed 8 February 2024).
Akın Saygın, Duygu, and Anil D. Aydın Kabakçı. 2023. “The use of controlled artificial intelligence as a co-author in academic article writing.” European Journal of Therapeutics https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1801
Anekwe, Tobenna D. 2010. “Profits and plagiarism: The case of medical ghostwriting. Bioethics 24(6), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00705.x
Ansari, Aisha N., Sohail Ahmad, and Sadia Bhutta. 2023. “Mapping the global evidence around the use of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic scoping review.” Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12223-4
Artino, Anthony R., Erik W. Driessen, and Lauren A. Maggio. 2019. “Ethical Shades of Gray: International Frequency of Scientific Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices in Health Professions Education.” Academic Medicine 94(1): 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002412
Barde, F., N. Peiffer-Smadja, and A. de La Blanchardière. 2020. “Fraude scientifique: une menace majeure pour la recherche médicale” (“Scientific misconduct: A major threat for Medical Research”). La Revue de Médecine Interne 41(5): 330–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.REVMED.2020.02.004
Bavdekar, Sandeep B. 2012. “Authorship issues.” Lung India 29(1): 76–80. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.92371
Bekker, Martin. 2024. “Large language models and academic writing: Five tiers of engagement.” South African Journal of Science 120(1–2). Academy of Science of South Africa. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2024/17147
Biagioli, Mario. 2022. “Ghosts, brands, and influencers: Emergent trends in scientific authorship.” Social Studies of Science 52(3): 463–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221095046
British Psychological Society 2017. “Ethical Guidelines.” chrome extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcaj
pcglclefindmkaj/https://cms.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/202206/Statement%20of%20Policy%20on%20Au
thorship%20and%20Publication%20Credit%20%282017%29.pdf (Accessed 7 February 2024).
COPE 2019. “COPE Council Discussion Document: Authorship.” September 2019. https://doi.org10.24318/cope.2019.3.3 (Accessed 7 February 2024).
Foltynek, Tomas, Sonya Bjelobaba, Irene Glendinning, Zeenath R. Khan, Rita Santos, Pegi Pavletic, and Július Kravjar. 2023. ENAI “Recommendations on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Education.” International Journal for Educational Integrity 19(1). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4
Gallant, Tricia B. 2016. “Response to White’s ‘Shadow Scholars and the Rise of the Dissertation Service Industry’.” Canada Journal of Research Practice Page 1 of 5 Journal of Research Practice 12(1). AU Press. http://jrp.icaap.
org/index.php/jrp/article/view/553/452
Genova, Zoë. 2023. “CRediT where its due.” https://www-elsevier-com.ez.sun.ac.za/connect/credit-where-credits-due (Accessed 14 February 2024)
Hass, Atrimecia. 2022. “Using plagiarism feedback as assessment for learning to socialise students into disciplinary writing: A theoretical perspective.” South African Journal of Higher Education 36(2): 133- 150. https://dx.doi.org/10.20853/36-2-4648
Hendrick, Rachel. 2011. “Ghosts in the machine.” BMJ (Online) 343(7835). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7860
ICMJE 2017. “Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors.” https://www.icmje.org/news-and-editorials/updated_recommendations_dec2017.html (Accessed 8 February 2024)
Jacobs, Adam, and Elizabeth Wager. 2005. “European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.” Current Medical Research and Opinion 21(2): 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1185/030079905X25578
Kennedy, Maureen S., Karen Roush, and Jane Barnsteiner. 2012. “The Ethics of Authorship.” American Journal of Nursing 111(9): 7.
Mahomed, S., I. Mackraj, and C. Blewett. 2023. “An Innovative Online Plagiarism Course for Students at a South African University.” South African Journal of Higher Education no 37 (2): 151‒166. https://dx.doi.org/10.20853/37-2-5046
Martinson, Brian C., Melissa S. Anderson, and Raymond de Vries. 2006. “Scientists Behaving Badly.” Nature 43: 737–738.
Matheson, Alistair. 2016. “Ghostwriting: The importance of definition and its place in contemporary drug marketing.” BMJ (Online) 354. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4578
Matheson, Alistair. 2023. “The “Monsanto papers” and the nature of ghostwriting and related practices in contemporary peer review scientific literature.” Accountability in Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2234819
McDowell, Gary S., John D. Knutsen, June M. Graham, Sarah K. Oelker, and Rebecca S. Lijek. 2019. “Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts.” https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48425.001
McNutt, Marcia K., Monica Bradford, Jeffrey M. Drazen, Brooks Hanson, Bob Howard, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Véronique Kiermer, Emilie Marcus, Barbara Kline Pope, Randy Schekman, Sowmya Swaminathan, Peter J, Stang, and Inder M. Verma. 2018. “Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115(11): 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115
Moffatt, Barton. 2011. “Responsible authorship: Why researchers must forgo honorary authorship.” Accountability in Research 18(2): 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.557297
Moffatt, Barton. 2013. “Orphan Papers and Ghostwriting: The Case against the ICMJE Criterion of Authorship.” Accountability in Research 20(2): 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2013.767115
Moffatt, Barton. 2018. “Scientific authorship, pluralism, and practice.” Accountability in Research 25(4): 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1437347
Nature (n.d.) https://www.nature.com/natsustain/editorial-policies/authorship (Accessed 8 February 2024).
Oravec, Jo Ann. 2015. “The moral imagination in an era of ‘Gaming Academia’: Implications of emerging reputational issues in scholarly activities for knowledge organization practices.” Knowledge Organization 42(5): 316–323. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-5-316
Oravec, Jo Ann. 2019. “The “Dark Side” of Academics? Emerging Issues in the Gaming and Manipulation of Metrics in Higher Education” The Review of Higher Education 42(Spring): 859–877.
Pruschak, Gernot and Christian Hopp. 2019. “And the Credit Goes to... - Ghost and Honorary Authorship among Social Scientists.” Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.12441abstract (Accessed 7 February 2024).
Roy, Siddharta and Marc A. Edwards. 2023. “NSF Fellows’ perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academia.” Scientific Reports 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32445-3
Shamoo, Adil E., and David B. Resnik. 2015. Responsible Conduct of Research. (Third Edition). Oxfordshire, UK: Oxford University Press.
Singh, Shaween and Dan Remenyi. 2016. “Plagiarism and ghostwriting: The rise in academic misconduct.” South African Journal of Science 112(5/6). http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/
Stretton, Serina. 2014. The Cochrane Library 1988+, Medical Writing 1998+, The American Medical Writers Association (AMWA) Journal 1986+, Council of Science Editors Annual Meetings 2007+, and the Peer Review Congress 1994+ were searched electronically. BMJ Open 4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013
Taylor and Francis 2017. https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/editorial-policies/defining-authorship-research-paper (Accessed 8 February 2024).
Tomaselli, Keyan, G. 2018. “Perverse incentives and the political economy of South African academic journal publishing.” South African Journal of Science 114(11/12). https://doi. org/10.17159/sajs.2018/4341
Vancouver recommendations. n.d. “Authorship guidelines and ethical standards.” https://www.lib.
chalmers.se/en/publish-and-analyse/publish-research/authorship-guidelines-and-ethical-standards/ (Accessed 8 February 2024).
Yadav, Sankalp and Gautam Rawal. 2018. “Ghostwriters in the scientific world.” Pan African Medical Journal 30. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.30.217.16312
Youmshajekian, Lori. 2024. Gift authorship common in psychology, survey suggests. Newstex Blogs Retraction Watch.
https://advance-lexis com.ez.sun.ac zaapi/document?collection=news&id urn:contentItem:6B4R-7RW1-JCMN-Y100-00000-00&context=1516831. (Accessed 12 February 2024).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ruth ALBERTYN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
