Liberté, égalité, fraternité: Changing erroneous conceptions of continuous assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20853/39-6-6462Keywords:
continues assessment, critical thinking skills, formative assessment, summative assessmentsAbstract
Scholars agree that assessment drives teaching and learning, which highlights the fact that the purpose of assessment is to enhance learning. In the framework of self-directed learning (SDL), the benefit of assessment for learning is promotion of SDL skills, such as critical thinking. Yet, data gathered from staff and students from a university’s education faculty during the first semester of 2023 (after three years of implementing continuous assessment) suggest that staff and students have distorted perceptions of continuous assessment and continue to struggle with it. Instead of being able to freely utilise the opportunity to promote learning in their respective disciplines, lecturers seem to be burdened by constraining programmes of assessment and administration, while students experience continuous assessment as nothing more than the challenge to complete multiple summative tasks, mostly in written form. This paper addresses misconceptions about continuous assessment in education. With the correct conceptual understanding comes the freedom to manage and facilitate assessment in diverse disciplines, to realise students’ critical thinking skills. We aim to demonstrate what is possible across the faculty, to set a common goal of excellence in assessment, and to foster enthusiasm for exploring possibilities in training innovative teachers. The participants completed one open-ended questionnaire aimed at gauging their assessment literacy. We share the findings that emerged from data analysis that involved assigning codes using ATLAS.ti™.
Downloads
References
Alsaleh, N.J. 2020. “Teaching critical thinking skills: Literature review.” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 19(1): 21–39.
Andrade, H., and S. Brookhart. 2020. “Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning.” Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice 27(4): 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
Bada, S.O. and S. Olusegun. 2015. “Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning.” Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6): 66–70.
British Council of Teaching English. 2019. Continuous assessment. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/continuous-assessment. Date of access: 25 October 2023.
Fahmi, F., I. Setiadi, D. Elmawati, and S. Sunardi. 2019. “Discovery learning method for training critical thinking skills of students.” European Journal of Education Studies 6(3): 342–351. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/2540/5178
Fouché, C. and W. Schurink. 2016. “Qualitative research designs.” In Research at grass roots: For the social sciences and human service professions. 4th ed., ed. A. de Vos, H. Strydom, C. Fouché and C. Delport, 307–327. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Fynn, A. and E.O. Mashile. 2022. “Continuous online assessment at a South African open distance and e-learning institution.” Frontiers in Education 7: Article 791271. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.791271/full Date of access: 28 Oct. 2023.
Hatt, J. 2019. “Dynamic, online, objective assessment for continuous assessment.” In Handbook of research on e-assessment in higher education, ed. A. Azevedo and J. Azevedo, 220–242. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://www.irma-international.org/chapter/dynamic-online-objective-assessment-for-continuous-assessment/212283/
Hedding, D.W., M. Greve, G.D. Breetzke, W. Nel, and B. Jansen van Vuuren. 2020. “COVID-19 and the academe in South Africa: Not business as usual.” South African Journal of Science 116(7/8): Article 8298. https://sajs.co.za/article/view/8298
Hernández, R. 2012. “Does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning?” Higher Education 64(4): 489–502. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257568277_Does_continuous_assessment_in_higher_education_support_student_learning
Ibarra-Sáiz, M., G. Rodríguez-Gómez, and D. Boud. 2021. “The quality of assessment tasks as a determinant of learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46(6): 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1828268
Jiang, J.-P., J.-Y. Hu, Y.-B. Zhang, and X.-C. Yin. 2022. “Fostering college students’ critical thinking skills through peer assessment in the knowledge building community.” Interactive Learning Environments 31(10): 6480–6496. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10494820.2022.2039949
Khan, R.A. and M. Jawaid. 2020. “Technology enhanced assessment (TEA) in COVID 19 pandemic.” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 36(COVID19-S4): S108–S110. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306940/
Loh, R.C.-Y. and S.-C. Ang. 2020. “Unravelling cooperative learning in higher education: A review of research.” Research in Social Sciences and Technology 5(2): 22–39. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1265259.pdf
Lubbe, A., and E. Mentz. 2021. “Self-directed learning-oriented assessment and assessment literacy: Essential for 21st century learning.” In Learning through assessment: An approach towards self-directed learning, eds. E Mentz and A. Lubbe, 1–25. Cape Town: AOSIS. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2021.BK280.01
McDowell, L., K. Sambell, V. Bazin, R. Penlington, D. Wakelin, H. Wickes, and J. Smailes. 2007. “Assessment for learning: Current practice exemplars from the Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning.” Paper delivered at the REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility, May 29–31. https://www.reap.ac.uk/reap/reap07/Portals/2/CSL/feast%20of%20case%20studies/Assessment_for_learning_current_practice_exemplars_from_CETL.pdf .Date of access: 24 Oct. 2023.
Merriam, S.B. 2009. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mkimbili, S. and S. Kitta. 2020. “The rationale of continuous assessment for development of competencies in Tanzania secondary schools.” Advanced Journal of Social Science 6(1): 64–70. https://journals.aijr.org/index.php/ajss/article/view/1469/231
Muskin, J.A. 2017. Continuous assessment for improved teaching and learning: A critical review to inform policy and practice. Geneva: International Bureau of Education, UNESCO. https://policytoolbox.iiep.unesco.org/library/HZ36PF4W
Obi, J.S.C. and S.U. Obineli. 2019. Continuous assessment in counselling. Enugu, Nigeria: Hugotez Publications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339655960_CONTINUOUS_ASSESSMENT_2019
Omonigho, A.J. 2019. “Continuous assessment: Scope and relevance.” Journal of Teacher Perspective 6(3): 554–563. https://www.globalacademicgroup.com/node/142
Said Pace, D. 2023. “Exploring the assessment experiences of eight teenage Maltese boys.” In Handbook of research on fostering social justice through intercultural and multilingual communication, ed. E. Meletiadou, 342–361. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/book/handbook-research-fostering-social-justice/293606. Date of access: 27 Oct. 2023.
Petersen, N. 2021. Guidelines for continuous assessment. University of Johannesburg. https://www.uj.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/uj-guidelines-for-continuous-assessment-2.pdf. Date of access: 25 Oct. 2023.
Rivas, S.F., C. Saiz, and C. Ossa. 2022. “Metacognitive strategies and development of critical thinking in higher education.” Frontiers in Psychology 13, Article 913219.
Rosidin, U., N. Haryanti,, H.A. Lora, and V. Viyanti. 2020. Reconstruct the class assessment strategy promoting the 21st-century learning. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3(1): 27–36.
Saenab, S., S. Zubaidah, S. Mahanal, and S.R. Lestari. 2021. “ReCODE to re-code: An instructional model to accelerate students’ critical thinking skills.” Education Sciences 11(1): Article 2. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/1/2
Saldaña, J. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
Sánchez-Ruiz, L.-M., S. Moll-López, J.-A. Moraño-Fernández, and M.-D. Roselló. 2021. “Dynamical continuous discrete assessment of competencies achievement: An approach to continuous assessment.” Mathematics 9(17): Article 2082. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/17/2082
Setiawan, A., U. Rosidin, and A. Abdurrahman. 2019. “The effectiveness of ongoing assessment on physics learning in improving students critical thinking skills.” International Educational Research 2(2): 16–22. https://doi.org/10.30560/ier.v2n2p1
Shaw, A., O.L. Liu, L. Gu, E. Kardonova, I. Chirikov, G. Li, S. Hu, N. Yu, L. Ma, F. Guo, Q. Su, J. Shi, H. Shi, and P. Loyalka. 2019. “Thinking critically about critical thinking: Validating the Russian HEIghten® critical thinking assessment.” Studies in Higher Education 45(9): 1933–1948. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336232309_Thinking_critically_about_critical_thinking_validating_the_Russian_HEIghtenR_critical_thinking_assessment
Thompson, C.C. 2019. “Advancing critical thinking through learning issues in problem-based learning.” Medical Science Educator 29(1): 149–156.
Tracy, S.J. 2019. Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. 2nd ed. Newark, NJ: Wiley. https://search.worldcat.org/title/qualitative-research-methods-collecting-evidence-crafting-analysis-communicating-impact/oclc/1111955517
Van Laar, E., A.J.A.M. Van Deursen, J.A.G.M. Van Dijk, and J. De Haan. 2020. “Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review.” SAGE Open 10(1): 1–14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338800933_Determinants_of_21st-Century_Skills_and_21st-Century_Digital_Skills_for_Workers_A_Systematic_Literature_Review
Watling, C.J. and S. Ginsburg. 2019. “Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning.” Medical Education 53(1): 76–85.
Yahya, S.A. and S.B. Yamin. 2014. “Difference and similarity of continuous assessment in Malaysian and Nigerian universities.” Journal of Education and Practice 5(1): 73–82.
Yashim, A.U. and S.K. Jibrin. 2020. “Continuous assessment in education: Problems and prospects.” Journal of Educational Assessment & Pedagogical Process 1(1): 1–
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anitia Lubbe

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0