An exploratory study to evaluate the teaching strategies in the hybrid Higher Education classroom
Abstract
This article presents the findings of a South African study conducted in a private Higher Education Institution. The aim of the article was to explore teaching strategies suitable for hybrid classrooms, to create an environment to integrate virtual and in-person student groups for optimal learning outcomes.
A hybrid classroom requires academic staff to engage both groups in student-centred activities and therefore, this article argues that traditional teaching strategies may not be optimal in achieving integration.
This exploratory study employed a practical action research design, to teaching strategies in hybrid classrooms. The data was collected by conducting class observation and two focus groups. The study used Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic analysis for data analysis.
The findings indicated that academic staff have a limited understanding regarding teaching strategies that would bridge the gap between virtual and in-person students. The study emphasised the necessity of an inquiry-based mindset in the hybrid teaching environment. The focus groups unanimously advocated for adopting an “adapted student-centred instructional approach” to address hybrid classroom challenges.
This research contributes to understanding student-centred teaching strategies in hybrid classrooms. The key insight was that teacher-centred approaches by academic staff did not equally integrate virtual and in-person student participation. The study underscores the importance of lecturer training in effective student-centred teaching strategies for optimal learning in hybrid classrooms
Downloads
References
Adams, Paul. 2013. “Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities.” Education 34(3): 243‒257.
Ahea, Md Mamoon-Al-Bashir, Md Rezaul Kabir Ahea, and Ismat Rahman. 2016. “The Value and Effectiveness of Feedback in Improving Students’ Learning and Professionalizing Teaching in Higher Education.” Journal of Education and Practice 7(16): 38‒41.
Berry, Sharla. 2019. “Teaching to connect: Community-building strategies for the virtual classroom.” Online Learning 23(1): 164‒183.
Binnewies, Sebastian and Zhe Wang. 2021. “Challenges of student equity and engagement in a HyFlex course.” In Blended learning designs in STEM higher education: Putting learning first, edited by Christopher N. Allan, Chris Campbell, and Julie Crough, 209‒230. Springer.
Bishop, Jacob and Matthew A. Verleger. 2022. “The flipped classroom: A survey of the research.” In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2—22585.
Bower, Matt, Barney Dalgarno, Gregor E. Kennedy, Mark J. W. Lee, and Jacqueline Kenney. 2015. “Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis.” Computers & Education 86: 1‒17.
Cain, William. 2015. “Technology Navigators: An Innovative Role in Pedagogy, Design and Instructional Support.” In Educational Innovations and Contemporary Technologies, edited by P. Redmond, J. Lock, and P. A. Danaher. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Cleveland-Innes, Martha and Dan Wilton. 2018. Guide to blended learning. Commonwealth of Learning.
Garrison, D. Randy and Kanuka Heather. 2004. “Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education.” The Internet and Higher Education 7(2): 95‒105.
Garrison, D. Randy, Terry Anderson, and Walter Archer. 2000. “Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education.” The Internet and Higher Education 2(2): 87‒105.
Garrison, D. Randy. 2016. E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. Taylor & Francis.
Halsall, Jamie P., Jason L. Powell, and Michael Snowden. 2016. “Determined learning approach: Implications of heutagogy society based learning.” Cogent Social Sciences 2(1): 1223904.
Hartnett, Maggie. 2016. “The importance of motivation in online learning.” In Motivation in online education, 5‒32. Springer.
Hase, Stewart and Chris Kenyon. (Ed.). 2016. “The nature of learning.” In Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action, 19‒38. London: Bloomsbury.
Hase, Stewart and Chris Kenyon. 2000. “From Andragogy to Heutagogy.” ultiBASE. http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au.
Heilporn, G., S. Lakhal, and M. Belisle. 2021. “An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 18: 25.
Johnson, Amy E., Matthew E. Jacovina, Devin. G. Russell, and Christian M. Soto. 2016. “Challenges and solutions when using technologies in the classroom.” In Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction, ed. S. A. Crossley and D. S. McNamara, 13‒29. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Lorenzo-Lledó, Alejandro, Asunción Lledó, Alba Gilabert-Cerdá, and Gonzalo Lorenzo. 2021. “The pedagogical model of hybrid teaching: Difficulties of university students in the context of COVID-19.” European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 11(4): 1320‒1332.
Maatuk, Abdelsalam M., Ebitisam K. Elberkawi, Shadi Aljawarneh, Hasan Rashaideh, and Hadeel Alharbi. 2022. “The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: Challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 34(1): 21‒38.
Means, B., Y. Toyama, R. F. Murphy, and M. Baki. 2013. “The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature.” Teachers College Record 115: 1‒47.
Mentzer, N., Bhawna Krishna, Ankita Kotangale, and Lakshmy Mohandas. 2023. “HyFlex environment: Addressing students’ basic psychological needs.” Learning Environments Research 26(1): 271‒289. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10984-022-09431-z. (Accessed 9 November 2023).
Mesquita, Anabela and Adriana Oliveira. 2022. “The Future of Higher Education and the Use of Newer Technologies and Pedagogical Approaches ‒ The Perspective of Students.” FAIMA Business & Management Journal 2022: 141.
Prince, Michael. 2004. “Does active learning work? A review of the research.” Journal of Engineering Education 93(3): 223‒231.
Raes, Annelies, Loulou Detienne, Ine Windey, and Fien Depaepe. 2020. “A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified.” Learning Environments Research 23: 269‒290.
Raes, Annelies. 2022. “Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environments: Does presence matter?” Postdigital Science and Education 4(1): 138‒159.
Shorey, Shefaly, Valerie Chan, Priyadharshni Rajendran, and Emily Ang. 2021. “Learning styles, preferences and needs of generation Z healthcare students: Scoping review.” Nurse Education in Practice 57: 103247.
Uday, Y. 2019. “Pedagogy, andragogy and heutagogy: Continuum and comparison.” International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR) 7(8): 1229‒1234.
Copyright (c) 2024 Helena van Wyk, Cecelia Rosa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
