Work systems framework for teaching workload model deployment at universities in South Africa

  • R. Nnadozie Rhodes University, Grahamstown
  • P. Chinomona Rhodes University, Grahamstown
Keywords: teaching workload, work systems framework, workload management, higher education institutions

Abstract

Academic workload management is a growing concern for public universities in South Africa. Over the period from 2008 to 2021, the student headcount in the higher education system has increased from approximately 800,000 to around 1,100,000 representing a 34 per cent increase. In contrast, the academic staff headcount witnessed a 28 per cent increase, emphasizing the challenges posed by the growing student population on the higher education system. However, state funding has failed to match the rate of inflation and the increase in the student headcount. Consequently, the teaching load has increased without corresponding growth in resources. This situation necessitates optimal planning and distribution of resources, particularly academic personnel. In developing the Teaching Workload Work System, Alter’s Work System Framework was adopted to evaluate the teaching workload problem by mapping its components using the concept of Key Elements in Alter’s Work Systems Framework. This article proposes a work systems framework for the management of teaching workload.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

R. Nnadozie, Rhodes University, Grahamstown

Institutional Research, Planning & Quality Promotion

P. Chinomona, Rhodes University, Grahamstown

Institutional Research, Planning & Quality Promotion

References

Alter, S. 2014. Notes on Work System Concept. San Francisco: University of San Francisco.

Bezuidenhout, A. 2015. “Implications for academic workload of the changing role of distance educators.” Distance Education 36(2): 246‒262.

Botha, P. A. and S. Swanepoel. 2015. “Allocation of Academic Workloads in the Faculty of Human and Social Sciences at a South African University.” Africa Education Review 12(3): 398‒414.

Burgess, T. F., H. A. Lewis, and T. Mobbs. 2003. “Academic Workload Planning Revisited.” Higher Education 46: 215‒233.

Cloete, N., I. Bunting, and F. van Schalkwyk. 2022. “Analyses of the Academic Staffing of SA Public Universities.” In HE & STI Policy Dialogues Series, DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Scientometrics and Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (SciSTIP). Stellenbosch University.

Department of Higher Education and Training. 2023. HEMIS data on academic staff and students (obtained through the HEDA data sharing portal). Pretoria: Department of Higher Education and Training.

DHET see Department of Higher Education and Training

Harley, A. 2017. “Alienating academic work.” Education as Change Volume 21 | Number 3.

Hosain, S. 2016. “Teaching Workload and Performance: An Empirical Analysis on Some Selected Private Universities of Bangladesh.” International Journal of English and Education 5(3).

Nnadozie, R. C. 2015. “A Model for Management of Workload of Academic Staff at a Developing University.” Corporate Ownership & Control 12(4).

Paewai, S. R., L. H. Meyer, and D. Houston. 2007. “Problem Solving Academic Workloads Management: A University Response.” Higher Education Quarterly 61(3): 375–390.

Parks, D. J., M. C. Gabert, S. B. Affleck, and H. J. Kuhr. 1995. Quantifying Academic Faculty Workloads. Boise: Boise State University.

Soliman, I. and H. Soliman. 1997. “Academic Workload and Quality, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.” Evaluation in Higher Education 22(2): 135‒157.

Qu, X., S. Wang, S. Easa, and Z. Liu. 2014. “Teaching load allocation in a teaching unit: Optimizing equity and quality.” In Conference Proceedings: Austral Asian Association for Engineering Education Engineering Education Research, December 2014. Wellington, New Zealand.

Published
2024-06-22
How to Cite
Nnadozie, R., and P. Chinomona. 2024. “Work Systems Framework for Teaching Workload Model Deployment at Universities in South Africa”. South African Journal of Higher Education 38 (3), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.20853/38-3-6362.