Reflectivity towards improving postgraduate student research supervision: A digital lens on the University of Namibia

Keywords: Digital Technology, Research Supervision, Model, Pedagogy, Common Sense

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore student supervision in research at the University of Namibia and propose interventions that enhance effective postgraduate student research supervision using digital technology. The paper employed Barry Stierer’s methods of critical reflection dictated by the three domains namely, criticality, reflexivity, and praxis. These methods are further used to support critical reflection of the context and make interpretations related to the use of technology to enhance student supervision in higher education institutions in general and at the University of Namibia in particular. This paper revealed that student supervision in research is not taken as a mean to enable pedagogic access. There is no institutional common procedures or model of postgraduate student research supervision leading to academics adopting the supervisory methods they have experienced when they were supervised. The paper contributed to theory, practice and policy that research supervision is taken as a common sense than a scientific approach. However, it recommended that postgraduate student research supervision can benefit from digital technology just like teaching and learning as well as assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

E. Haipinge, University of Namibia

Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching

N. Kadhila, University of Namibia

Center for Quality Assurance and Management

L. M. Josua, University of Namibia

Department of Higher Education and Lifelong Learning

References

Alam, Firoz, Quamrul Alam, and M.G. Rasul. 2013. “A Pilot Study on Postgraduate Supervision.” Procedia Engineering 56: 875–81. https:/doi/org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.210.

Botha, Jan. 2017. “Doctoral supervision”. African Doctoral Academy. SUN MeDIA: Stellenbosch.

Boyer, Ernest L. 1990. “Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate”. Princeton University Press, 3175 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648.

Carmesin, Berit, Uta Hoffmann, Gunda Huskobla, and Sebastian Huster,(Eds.) 2015. “Doctoral supervision: Recommendations and good practice for universities and doctoral supervisors.” UniWiND, 2015.

Chamberlain, Sussana. 2016. “Ten types of PhD supervisor relationships–which is yours.” The conversation 12. Accessed November, 30, 2023 http://theconversation.com/ten–types-of-phd-supervisor-relationshipswhich-is-yours-52967

Cuff, Ed. 2014. “The effect and importance of technology in the research process.” Journal of Educational Technology Systems 43(1): 75–97. https:/doi/org/10.2190/ET.43.1.f

Dai, Yun, Sichen Lai, Cher Ping Lim, and Ang Liu. 2023. “ChatGPT and its impact on research supervision: Insights from Australian postgraduate research students.“ Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 39 (4):,74–88. https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/download/8843/2026

Freire, Paulo. 1972. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum: New York.

Gatfield, Terry. 2005.“An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27(3): 311–325. https:/doi/org/10.1080/13600800500283585

Gumbo, Mishack Thiza. 2019. “Online or offline supervision? Postgraduate supervisors state their position at university of South Africa.” South African Journal of Higher Education 33(1) 92–110. https:/doi/org/10.20853/33-1-2673

Lee, Anne. 2008 “How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision.” Studies in Higher education 33(3: 267–281.

Le, Quynh. 2012 . “E‐Portfolio for enhancing graduate research supervision.” Quality Assurance in Education 20, no. 1, 54–65. https:/doi/org/10.1108/09684881211198248

Magesa, Emmanuel, and Lukas Matati Josua. 2022. Use of technology to morph teaching and learning in higher education: Post COVID–19 era. Creative Education 13(3) : 846–853. https:/doi/org/10.4236/ce.2022.133055.

Maxwell, Thomas W., and Robyn Smyth. 2011. “Higher degree research supervision: From practice toward theory.” Higher Education Research & Development 30(2): 219–231. https:/doi/org/10.1080/07294360.2010.509762

McCallin, Antoinette, and Shoba Nayar. 2012. “Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 17(1): 63–74.

https:/doi/org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590979

Morton, Janne, Neomy Storch, and Celia Thompson. 2014. “Feedback on writing in the supervision of postgraduate students: Insights from the work of Vygotsky and Bakhtin.” Journal of Academic Language and Learning 8(1) A24-A36. Accessed at https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/download/308/183

Muraraneza, Claudine, Ntombifikile Mtshali, and Thokozani Bvumbwe. 2020. "Challenges in postgraduate research supervision in nursing education: Integrative review." Nurse education today 89: 104376.

Ngakane, B., and B. Madlela. 2022. “Effectiveness and policy implications of using WhatsApp to supervise research projects in open distance learning teacher training institutions in Swaziland.” Indiana Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 3(3): 1–10.

Oehne, Christian, and Sascha Bardua. 2019. “University Teachers’ Perspectives on the Use of Educational Technology in the Research Supervision Process: A case–study on the supervision process of students during their final thesis at the Jönköping University in Sweden.” Accessed https://hj.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1325845/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Pearson, Margot, and Angela Brew. 2002. “Research training and supervision development.” Studies in Higher education 27(2): 135–150. https:/doi/org/10.1080/03075070220119986c

Poston, Lawrence, and Ernest L. Boyer. 1992. “Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate.” AAUP Bulletin 78(4): 43. https:/doi/org/10.2307/40250362.

Qureshi, Rashida, and Neelofar Vazir. 2016. “Pedagogy of research supervision pedagogy: A constructivist model.” Research in Pedagogy 6(2): 95–110. https:/doi/org/10.17810/2015.38

Reid, Anna, and Stephen Marshall. 2009. “Institutional development for the enhancement of research and research training.” International Journal for Academic Development 14(2): 145–157. https:/doi/org/10.1080/13601440902970031

Schön, Donald A.1987. “Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions.” http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-97655-000.

Shandomo, Hibajene M. 2010. “The Role of Critical Reflection in Teacher Education” School-University Partnerships 4(1): 101–13. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ915885.pdf.

Stierer, Barry. 2008. “Learning to write about teaching: understanding the writing demands of lecturer development programmes in higher education.” The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education, 34–45.

Suhaimi, Nurafifah Mohammad, Shuzlina Abdul–Rahman, Sofianita Mutalib, Nurzeatul Hamimah Abdul Hamid, and Abdul Hamid. 2019. “Review on Predicting Students’ Graduation Time Using Machine Learning Algorithms.” International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science 11(7): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2019.07.01.

Suparman, Ujang. 2021.” The Implementation of the Online Thesis Supervision During Pandemic Covid–19 at One of Graduate and Postgraduate Programs in Indonesia.” Aksara 22(1): 43–53. https://doi.org/10.23960/aksara/v22i1.pp43–53.

Taylor, Stan.2018. “Enhancing practice in research supervision.” Research Supervisors’ Network.

Taysum, Alison. 2015. Doctoral supervision. In Waghid, Yusef. “Dancing with doctoral encounters: Democratic education in motion”. AFRICAN SUN MeDIA.

University of Namibia. 2019. “Research ethics policy, regulations and guidelines.” Windhoek: University of Namibia.

University of Namibia. 2023. “Strategic Plan: 2019 – 2024. Vision & Mission.” 2021. Accessed December 12, 2023, https://www.unam.edu.na/about-unam/vision-mission

van Rooij, Els, Marjon Fokkens-Bruinsma, and E. Jansen. 2021. “Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: the importance of PhD project characteristics.” Studies in Continuing Education 43(1): 48–67.

Wellington, Jerry. 2013. “Searching for ‘doctorateness’.” Studies in Higher Education 38(10): 1490–1503. https:/doi/org/10.1080/03075079.2011.634901

Zvavahera, Promise, and Fine Masimba. 2019. “The use of information and communication technology in supervising open and distance learning PhD students.” Ukrainian Journal of Educational Studies and Information Technology 7(3): 32–41. https://doi.org/10.32919/uesit.2019.03.04

Published
2025-04-27
How to Cite
Haipinge, E., N. Kadhila, and L. M. Josua. 2025. “Reflectivity towards Improving Postgraduate Student Research Supervision: A Digital Lens on the University of Namibia”. South African Journal of Higher Education 39 (1), 100-119. https://doi.org/10.20853/39-1-6282.
Section
General Articles