Blended, flipped and lit: Student perceptions and performance under blended learning with a flipped classroom and a lightboard
Abstract
Promoting student success is a key objective for higher education institutions in South Africa, and the post-pandemic era presents the sector with a novel opportunity to take advantage of improved online learning infrastructure and skills. As institutions face critical decisions regarding teaching modalities, it is imperative to establish and enhance evidence on the extent to which blended learning can – or cannot – facilitate student success in a post-pandemic setting.
This article examines student perceptions of and academic performance in a large first-year accounting class which recently implemented a blended learning model that involved a flipped classroom approach and video lessons filmed with a lightboard. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses, we find that students perceive the blended model as advantageous to their learning experience and perceive video lessons filmed with a lightboard to be especially valuable. These positive sentiments are reflected in improved performance across the entire grade distribution. Using regression analysis that allows us to account for observable differences in the characteristics of those taught in person and those taught via the blended model, we find a statistically significant 7 per cent improvement in students’ final grades. We find an even stronger association between the blended model and improved performance for students who have experienced gaps and disparities in education and life experiences. Ultimately, this study, conducted at a contact university in South Africa, makes a strong case for the benefits of blended learning, and reveals one way to structure the learning activities in a large class to take full advantage of these benefits.
Downloads
References
Akçayır, G. and M. Akçayır. 2018. “The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges.” Computers & Education 126: 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021.
Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. 2016. Online Report Card − Tracking Online Education in the United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572777.pdf.
Almahasees, Z., K. Mohsen, and M. O. Amin. 2021. “Faculty’s and Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning During COVID-19.” Frontiers in Education 6: 638470. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.638470.
Bergmann, J. and A. Sams. 2012. Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education.
Bernard, R., E. Borokhovski, R. Schmid, R. Tamim, and P. Abrami. 2014. “A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 26(1): 87‒122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3.
Bhat, S., P. Chinprutthiwong, and M. Perry. 2015. “Seeing the Instructor in Two Video Styles: Preferences and Patterns.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 305‒312. Madrid, Spain.
Bruwer, A. and J. M. Ontong. 2020. “Early assessment as a predictor of academic performance: an analysis of the interaction between early assessment and academic performance by first-year accounting students at a South African university.” South African Journal of Higher Education 34(4): 11‒26.
Cheung, K. S., J. Lam, N. Lau, and C. Shim. 2010. “Instructional Design Practices for Blended Learning.” In Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, 1–4. Wuhan, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISE.2010.5676762.
Department of Higher Education and Training. 2013. “White paper for post-school education and training. Building an expanded, effective and integrated post-school system.” Government Gazette no 37229.
Department of Higher Education and Training. 2023. Statistics on Post-School Education and Training in South Africa: 2021. Published by the Department of Higher Education and Training.
Fisher, R., Á. Perényi, and N. Birdthistle. 2021. “The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction.” Active Learning in Higher Education 22(2): 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418801702.
Garrison, D. and H. Kanuka. 2004. “Blended Learning: Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education.” The Internet and Higher Education 7(2): 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001.
Gerber, A. and S. Eybers. 2021. “Converting to inclusive online flipped classrooms in response to Covid-19 lockdown.” South African Journal of Higher Education 35(4): 34‒57.
Graham, C. R. 2021. “Exploring Definitions, Models, Frameworks, and Theory for Blended Learning Research.” In Blended Learning, edited by A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, C. R. Graham, and P. D. Moskal. 1st Edition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037736-3.
Hrastinski, S. 2019. “What Do We Mean by Blended Learning?” TechTrends 63(5): 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5.
Janse van Rensburg, E. D. and J. W. Oguttu. 2022. “Blended teaching and learning: Exploring the concept, barriers to implementation and designing of learning resources.” South African Journal of Higher Education 36(6): 285–298.
Keller, J. H., J. M. Hassell, S. A. Webber, and J. N. Johnson. 2009. “A comparison of academic performance in traditional and hybrid sections of introductory managerial accounting.” Journal of Accounting Education 27(3): 147–154.
Lai, C.-L. and G.-J. Hwang. 2016. “A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course.” Computers & Education 100: 126–140.
Lapuh Bele, J. and J. Rugelj. 2007. “Blended learning ‒ An opportunity to take the best of both worlds.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET) 2(3).
Lubrick, M., G. Zhou, and J. Zhang. 2019. “Is the Future Bright? The Potential of Lightboard Videos for Student Achievement and Engagement in Learning.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education 15(8): Article No: em1735. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108437.
Martínez-Caro, E. and F. Bolarín. 2011. “Factors affecting students’ satisfaction in engineering disciplines: Traditional vs. Blended approaches.” European Journal of Engineering Education 36(5): 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2011.619647.
Means, B., Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, and M. Bakia. 2013. “The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature.” Teachers College Record 115(3): 1–47
Mhlanga, D. 2021. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution and COVID-19 Pandemic in South Africa: The Opportunities and Challenges of Introducing Blended Learning in Education.” Journal of African Education 2(2): 15–42
Muxtorjonovna, A. M. 2020. “Significance of Blended Learning in Education System.” The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations 02(08): 507–511. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume02Issue08-82.
Northwestern University. 2016. Lightboard Studio. https://digitallearning.northwestern.edu/article/2016/04/12/lightboard-studio
Nyoni, P. 2022. “Pedagogies of access and success among South African university students in the extended curriculum programmes amidst Covid-19 disruptions.” South African Journal of Higher Education 36(4): 137‒153.
Papageorgiou, E. 2022. “Self-Regulated learning strategies and academic performance of accounting students at a South African university.” South African Journal of Higher Education 36(1): 251‒278.
Patmanthara, S. and W. N. Hidayat. 2018. “Improving Vocational High School Students Digital Literacy Skill through Blended Learning Model.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1028: 012076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012076.
Picciano, A. 2006. “Blended learning: Implications for growth and access.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i3.1758.
Poon, J. 2013. “Blended learning: An institutional approach for enhancing students’ learning experiences.” Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 9(2): 271–288.
Rogers, P. D. and D. T. Botnaru. 2019. “Shedding Light on Student Learning through the Use of Lightboard Videos.” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 13(3): 6.
Rossouw, M. and S. M. Brink. 2021. “An investigation into the success rates of students with no prior accounting knowledge in obtaining a professional accounting degree.” South African Journal of Higher Education 35(2): 230‒245
Sexton, N. D. and R. Rudman. 2022. “Program renewal: Students perception on changes to teaching pedagogy in auditing. South African Journal of Higher Education 36(3): 249‒268.
Sharaievska, I., O. McAnirlin, M. H. E. M. Browning, L. R. Larson, L. Mullenbach, A. Rigolon, A. D’Antonio, S. Cloutier, J. Thomsen, E. C. Metcalf, and N. Reigner. 2022. “‘Messy transitions’: Students’ perspectives on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on higher education.” Higher Education (2022): 1‒18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00843-7.
Smith, T., C. Knight, and M. Penumetcha. 2017. “Lightboard, Camera, Nutrition!” Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 117(9): A70.
So, H.-J. and T. A. Brush. 2008. “Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors.” Computers & Education 51(1): 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009.
Sohrabi, B., and H. Iraj. 2016. “Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions.” Computers in Human Behavior 60: 514–524.
Steenkamp, G. and O. van Schalkwyk. 2023. Active learning in an online postgraduate research module: Perceptions of accounting students and lecturers. South African Journal of Higher Education 37(2): 233‒250.
Strayer, J. F. 2012. “How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation.” Learning Environments Research 15(2): 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4.
Stull, A. T., L. Fiorella, M. J. Gainer, and R. E. Mayer. 2018. “Using transparent whiteboards to boost learning from online STEM lectures.” Computers & Education 120: 146‒159
Van der Velde, R., N. Blignaut-Van Westrhenen, N. H. M. Labrie, and M. B. Zweekhorst. 2021. “‘The idea is nice ... but not for me’: First-year students’ readiness for large-scale ‘flipped lectures’ ‒ what (de)motivates them?” Higher Education 81(6): 1157–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00604-4.
VanderMolen, Julia, Kristen Vu, and Justin Melick. 2018. “Use of Lightboard Video Technology to Address Medical Dosimetry Concepts: Field Notes,” Current Issues in Emerging eLearning 4(1): Article 6. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol4/iss1/6.
Vaughan, N. 2007. “Perspectives on Blended Learning in Higher Education.” International Journal on E-Learning 6(1): 81–94.
Whitelaw, E., N. Branson, and M. Leibbrandt. 2022. Learning in lockdown: University students’ academic performance during COVID-19 closures. SALDRU Working Paper No. 289. University of Cape Town.
Copyright (c) 2023 Emma Whitelaw, Jimmy Winfield

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0