Research Paradigms in Education: A Comparation Between Foucault’s Postmodernism, Positivism, Interpretivism and Critical Theory
Abstract
The concept of paradigm in research is one that many postgraduate students as well as emerging researchers find difficult to understand and apply in their research proposal and/or research writings. In recent seminars, I have observed that students in higher degrees find the concept of research paradigms, particularly the postmodern paradigm, as difficult to explain. This conceptual paper focuses on what Foucault (1970) refers to as “discursive formations” and discusses the constitutive elements of discursive formations are. The similarities and differences between Foucault’s view of knowledge and the views of knowledge held within positivism, interpretivism and critical theory are indicated as a way of making the paradigmatic language for these positions comprehensible. Foucault’s work (1970, “The Archaeology of Knowledge”) is used to look at the educational implications of postmodernism, helping to understand the processes of learning and teaching, as well as what is considered as educational knowledge.
Downloads
References
Anon. n.d. Thomas Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions. http://bertie.ccsu.edu/naturesci/PhilSci/Kuhn.html (accessed 31 May 2023).
Barwell, Richard. 2009. Researchers’ descriptions and the construction of mathematical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics 72 (2009): 255-269.
Burton, Stephanie, Francis Faller, Andrew Kaniki, Andrew Leitsch, and Isaac Ntshoe. 2022. Are South African doctoral qualifications educating the thinkers we need? South African Journal of Science 118 (11–12): 1–4.
Davies, Clare, and Murray Fischer. 2018. Understanding research paradigms. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association 21 (3): 21–25.
Edwards, R. and Usher, R., 2002. Postmodernism and education: Different voices, different worlds. Routledge.
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The archaeology of knowledge. Social Science Information 9 (1): 175–185.
Foucault, Michel. 1971. Orders of Discourse. Social Science Information 10 (2): 7–30.
Foucault, Michel, 1972. The Archaeology of. Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. A. Sheridan. London: Allen Lane Penguin.
Foucault, Michel. 2000. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London and New York: Routledge Classics.
Hahn, Hans, Otto Neurath, and Rudolf Carnap. 1929. "Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis." Trans. P. Foulkes and M. Neurath. The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle. In Empiricism and Sociology, eds. R. S. Cohen and M. Neurath (1983). 299–318. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Hall, Stuart. 1992. Introduction: identity in question. In Modernity and its Futures, eds. Stuart Hall, David Held and Anthony G. McGrew. London: Polity Press.
Jacobs, George M. and Thomas Sylvester Charles Farrell 2001. Paradigm shift: Understanding and implementing change in second language education. TESL–EJ, 5, 1.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1974. Second thoughts on paradigms. The Structure of Scientific Theories 2: 459–482.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 2012. The structure of scientific revolutions. 4th ed. University of Chicago Press.
McGinity, Ruth, and Maija Salokangas. 2014. Introduction: ‘Embedded research’ as an approach into academia for emerging researchers. Management in Education 28 (1): 3–5.
Patton, Michael Quinn. 2002. "Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective." Qualitative social work 1, no. 3: 261–283.
Pyhältö, Kirsi, Jouni Peltonen, Henrika Antila, Liezel Frick, and Philip De Jager. 2023. Engaged and/or burnt out? Finnish and South African doctoral students’ experiences. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 14 (1): 1–18.
Rehman, Adil Abdul, and Khali Alharthi. 2016. An introduction to research paradigms. International Journal of Educational Investigations 3 (8): 51–59.
Shalem, Yael. 1999. Epistemological labor: The way to significant pedagogical authority. Educational Theory 49 (1): 53–70.
Spivak, Gayatri. 1987. In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. New York: Methuen.
Troudi, Salah. 2010. Paradigmatic nature and theoretical framework in educational research. TESOL Arabia Publications.
Usher, Robin, and David Scott, eds. 1996. The politics of educational research. In Understanding educational research. Routledge.
Walshaw, Margaret. 2007. Getting to grips with Foucault. In Working with Foucault in Education, 1–25. Brill.
Walshaw, Margaret, ed. 2004. Mathematics education within the postmodern. IAP.
Copyright (c) 2023 Hlamulo Mbhiza

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0