Multi-stakeholder perceptions of doctoral graduate attributes: A South African perspective

Keywords: Doctoral graduate attributes, doctoral education and training, higher education capacitation, transferable skills, postgraduate retention and throughput, postgraduate education and training

Abstract

International literature reflects that doctoral graduate attributes (DGAs) include a range of academic, soft skills and personal qualities. This study described multi-stakeholder perceptions of DGAs in the South African higher education context. Fourteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with doctoral students, doctoral graduates and academic staff from four South African higher education institutions. Participants understood DGAs as the outcomes of the doctorate degree, which are developed over time. Participants’ experiences of DGAs included discussion of “academic” attributes, which align with the Qualifications Standards for Doctoral Degrees. Participants also discussed a range of personal attributes and “soft skills”. Doctoral supervisors focused on the academic attributes, whereas doctoral students and graduates gave comparatively greater weight to the personal qualities that supported the completion of their doctorates. DGAs extend beyond the traditional academic attributes, and include the “soft skills” and personal attributes that are invaluable for completion and employability. South African higher education institutions need to utilise a more comprehensive, dynamic conceptualisation of DGAs, and provide developmental support for both academic and non-academic attributes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

J. S. Senekal, University of the Western Cape, Bellville

Psychology Department

E. Munnik, University of the Western Cape, Bellville

Psychology Department

J. M. Frantz, University of the Western Cape, Bellville

DVC: Research and Innovation

References

Barrie, S. C. 2006. “Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates.” Higher Education 51(2): 215‒241. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7.

Bitzer, E. and M. Withering. 2020. “Graduate attributes: How some university students experience and learn them.” South African Journal of Higher Education 34(3): 13‒31. https://doi.org/10.20853/34-3-3504.

Bless, C., C. Higson-Smith, and S. L. Sithole. 2013. Fundamentals of social research methods: An African perspective. 5th Edition. Cape Town: Juta & Co.

Boulos, A. 2016. “The labour market relevance of PhDs: An issue for academic research and policy-makers.” Studies in Higher Education 41(5): 901‒913. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1147719.

Burton, S., F. Faller, A. Kaniki, A. Leitch, and I. Ntshoe. 2022. “Are South African doctoral qualifications educating the thinkers we need?” South African Journal of Science 118(11/12): 1‒4. doi: 10.17159/sajs.2022/14314.

Braun, V. and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic analysis.” In APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, edited by H. Cooper, 57‒71. APA. doi: 10.1037/13620-004.

Bryan, B. and K. Guccione. 2018. “Was it worth it? A qualitative exploration into graduate perceptions of doctoral value.” Higher Education Research & Development 37(6): 1124‒1140. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1479378.

CeSTII. 2023. “South African national survey of research and experimental development: Statistical report 2020/21, edited by CeSTII-HSRC on behalf of DSI: HSRC.” http://archivesite.hsrc.ac.za/uploads/pageContent/1047111/R&D_StatisticalReport2020-21_WEB%20[FINAL].pdf.

CHE see Council on Higher Education.

Council on Higher Education. 2018. Qualification Standard for Doctoral Degrees, Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework. Pretoria: Council on Higher Education. https://nr-online-1.che.ac.za/html_documents/3.Doctoral%20Degrees%20Qualification%20Standard_Version%201.0_%20%20HEQC%20Approved%208%20November%202018%20(002).pdf.

Council on Higher Education. 2022. “National review of South African doctoral qualifications 2020‒2021: Doctoral degrees national report.” Council on Higher Education. https://www.che.ac.za/sites/default/files/inline-files/CHE%20Doctoral%20Degrees%20National%20Reporte.pdf.

Creaton, J. and V. Anderson. 2021. “The impact of the professional doctorate on managers’ professional practice.” The International Journal of Management Education 19(1): 100461. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100461.

Cuthbert, D. and T. Molla. 2014. “PhD crisis discourse: A critical approach to the framing of the problem and some Australian ‘solutions’.” Higher Education 69(1): 33‒53. doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9760-y.

DSI. 2021. Science, Technology and Innovation Decadal Plan 2021‒2031. (Draft). Pretoria: Department of Science and Innovation.

Durette, B., M. Fournier, and M. Lafon. 2016. “The core competencies of PhDs.” Studies in Higher Education 41(8): 1355‒1370. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.968540.

Emmel, N. 2013. “Purposeful sampling.” In Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research: A Realist Approach. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Faller, F., S. Burton, A. Kaniki, A. Leitch, and I. Ntshoe. 2023. “Achieving Doctorateness: Is South African Higher Education Succeeding with Graduate Attributes?” South African Journal of Higher Education 37(2): 93‒108. Doi: 10.20853/37-2-5370.

Frantz, J., J. Cupido-Masters, F. Moosajee, and M. R. Smith. 2021. “Non-cognitive Support for Postgraduate Studies: A Systematic Review.” Front Psychol 12: 773910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773910.

Granata, S. N. and F. Dochy. 2016. “Applied PhD research in a work-based environment: An activity theory-based analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 41(6): 990‒1007. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.966666.

Holley, K. A. 2018. “The Longitudinal Career Experiences of Interdisciplinary Neuroscience PhD Recipients.” The Journal of Higher Education 89(1): 106‒127. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2017.1341755.

Kensington-Miller, B., B. Knewstubb, A. Longley, and A. Gilbert. 2018. “From invisible to SEEN: A conceptual framework for identifying, developing and evidencing unassessed graduate attributes.” Higher Education Research & Development 37(7): 1439‒1453. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1483903.

Koonin, M. 2014. “Validity and reliability.” In Research Matters, edited by F. du Plooy-Cilliers, C. Davis, and R-M. Bezuidenhout, 252‒261. Cape Town: Juta.

Mashiyi, F. N. 2015. “Embedding graduate attributes into the foundation programme: Reflections on process and product.” South African Journal of Higher Education 29(1): 181‒197. doi: https://doi.org/10.20853/29-1-456.

Maxwell, T. W. and D. Chophel. 2020. “The impact and outcomes of (non-education) doctorates: The case of an emerging Bhutan.” Higher Education 80(6): 1081‒1102. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00531-4.

McKenna, S. 2017. “Crossing conceptual thresholds in doctoral communities.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54(5): 458‒466. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2016.1155471.

McKenna, S. and S. van Schalkwyk. 2023. “A scoping review of the changing landscape of doctoral education.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education January: 1‒18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2023.2168121.

Molla, T. and D. Cuthbert. 2016. “In pursuit of the African PhD: A critical survey of emergent policy issues in select sub-Saharan African nations, Ethiopia, Ghana and South Africa.” Policy Futures in Education 14(6): 635‒654. doi: 10.1177/1478210316641567.

Mouton, J., M. van Lill, H. Prozesky, T. Bailey, M. Duncan, N. Boshoff, C. Albertyn, and R. Treptow. 2022. “A National Tracer Study of Doctoral Graduates in South Africa. DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Scientometrics and Science, Technology and Innovation Policy.” https://www0.sun.ac.za/scistip/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/National-Tracer-Study-of-Doctoral-Graduates-in-SA_DSI-approved.pdf.

Mowbray, S. and C. Halse. 2010. “The purpose of the PhD: Theorising the skills acquired by students.” Higher Education Research & Development 29(6): 653‒664. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.487199.

Munnik, E. and M. R. Smith. 2019. “Methodological rigour and coherence in the construction of instruments: The emotional social screening tool for school readiness.” African Journal of Psychological Assessment 1(0): 2a. doi: 10.4102/ajop.

National Planning Commission. 2011. National development plan 2030: Our future ‒ make it work. Pretoria: National Planning Commission. https://www.nationalplanningcommission.org.za/assets/Documents/ndp-2030-our-future-make-it-work.pdf.

Nell, I. A. and J. P. Bosman. 2017. “Integrating graduate attributes into a Master of Divinity programme at a South African university.” South African Journal of Higher Education 31(1): 175‒190. doi: 10.20853/31-1-868.

Nikol, P. and A. Lietzmann. 2019. “mindSET European Transferable Skills Training Demands Survey – Analysis Report, Training the mindSET – Improving and Internationalizing Skills Trainings for Doctoral Candidates.” European Commission. http://www.mindset-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/mindSET-European-Transferable-Skills-Training-Demands-Survey-Analysis-Report-final.pdf.

Senekal, J. S., E. Munnik, and J. M. Frantz. 2022. “A Systematic Review of Doctoral Graduate Attributes: Domains and Definitions.” Frontiers in Education 7: 1‒22. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.1009106.

Vaismoradi, M., H. Turunen, and T. Bondas. 2013. “Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study.” Nursing & Health Sciences 15(3): 398‒405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048.

Vitae. 2010. Researcher Development Framework. UK: The Careers Research and Advisory Centre Limited. https://www.vitae.ac.uk/vitae-publications/rdf-related/researcher-development-framework-rdf-vitae.pdf/@@download/file/Researcher-Development-Framework-RDF-Vitae.pdf.

Willison, J. and K. O’Regan. 2008/2015. “Research Skill Development Framework.” www.adelaide.edu.au/rsd/framework/rsd7.

Yazdani, S. and F. Shokooh. 2018. “Defining Doctorateness: A Concept Analysis.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 13: 031‒148. doi: 10.28945/3939.

Published
2024-08-24
How to Cite
Senekal, J. S., E. Munnik, and J. M. Frantz. 2024. “Multi-Stakeholder Perceptions of Doctoral Graduate Attributes: A South African Perspective”. South African Journal of Higher Education 38 (4), 240-64. https://doi.org/10.20853/38-4-5857.
Section
General Articles