Research projects as a learning tool in accounting education: A supervisor perspective
Abstract
The work environment that Stellenbosch University (SU) accounting graduates enter is changing with the advent of technology. The Fourth Industrial Revolution requires new skills from accounting professionals. Professional bodies have responded by updating their competency frameworks, while higher education institutions (HEIs) are expected to respond by changing their teaching and learning approaches. The core focus of competency development is business, digital, relational, and decision–making acumen (South African Institute of Chartered Accountants SAICA 2021b), and focuses on both professional and technical skills. Even though several of these professional skills align with the graduate attributes aspired to be developed by HEIs (such as SU), this is still a significant departure from traditional thoughts about accounting pedagogy, where much of the focus is on passing external assessments set by professional bodies. This is not the only change that accounting academics must make. The accounting profession is not known for research, nor postgraduate studies. As a result, until recently, many accounting academics have not had the opportunity to conduct or supervise research.
The entire SU BAcc(Hons) programme class of 2020 completed a large integrated research project by researching a self–defined research problem and documenting the results. These students have never been required to complete any large group research project before, and consequently were able to develop new skills. The students were for the first time required to, inter alia, decide on a research problem, develop and justify a methodology, execute the research, and communicate the findings. It was also the first time that many of the lecturers acted as supervisors. This presented a unique opportunity to obtain an understanding of the lecturers’ perceptions of whether the inclusion of the large–scale group research component (as a learning tool) assisted students in attaining the competencies required by the research development framework (Vitae®© 2010) together with the updated SAICA competency framework (SAICA 2021b). The results were used to understand the effectiveness of the group research project in developing competencies not currently addressed by traditional learning tools used to educate aspiring professional accountants. The results indicate that a research project develops skills (such as communication, problem–solving, critical thinking, and collaboration skills) not normally developed at such a large scale, nor over a sustained period of time. The results highlight the importance of correct positioning of the project to develop professional competencies as opposed to technical competencies. This positioning is important for students and staff, since it appears that there are some lecturers who still believe that the focus should remain on passing the professional standard setting assessments (i.e., short–term view), rather than developing competencies (such as argumentative communication skills) that could aid the students’ career in the long term.
Downloads
References
Adediwura, A.A., and B. Tayo. 2007. “Perception of Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitude and Teaching Skills as Predictor of Academic Performance in Nigerian Secondary Schools.” Educational Research and Review 2 (7):165–71. http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR.
Ahmed, V., and A. Opoku. 2022. “Technology Supported Learning and Pedagogy in Times of Crisis: The Case of COVID–19 Pandemic.” Education and Information Technologies 27: 365–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10706-w.
Ballantine, J., and P. McCourt Larres. 2009. “Accounting Undergraduates’ Perceptions of Cooperative Learning as a Model for Enhancing Interpersonal and Communication Skills to Interface Successfully with Professional Accountancy Education and Training.” Accounting Education: An International Journal 16(4): 387–402.
Barac, K. 2009. “South African Training Officers’ Perceptions of the Knowledge and Skills Requirements of Entry–Level Training Accountants.” Meditari Accountancy Research 17(2): 19–46.
Barac, K. 2017. “Critical Thinking: A Prized Commodity.” https://www.bbrief.co.za/
/09/19/critical–thinking–a–prized–commodity/.
Barac, K., and L. du Plessis. 2019. “Teaching Pervasive Skills to South African Accounting Students.” Southern African Business Review 18(1): 53–79. https://doi.org/10.25159/1998-8125/5645.
Beckman, M., and N. Hensel. 2009. “Making Explicit the Implicit: Defining Undergraduate Research.” CUR Quarterly 29(4): 40–4. https://www.mcgill.ca/
senate/files/senate/beckman__hensel_making_explicit.pdf.
Bhattacharjee, S., and L. Shaw. 2001. “Evidence That Independent Research Projects Improve Accounting Students’ Technology–Related Perceptions and Skills.” Accounting Education 10(1): 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/096392801100
Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA). 2014. CGMA Competency Framework. London: Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. https://www.cimaglobal.com/Employers/CGMA-The-new-global-standard/CGMA-Competency-Framework/.
Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR). 2017. Definition of Undergraduate Research. http://www.cur.org/about_cur.
Crawford, L., C. Helliar, and E.A. Monk. 2011. “Generic Skills in Audit Education.” Accounting Education: An International Journal 20(2): 115–31.
Dolce, V., F. Emanuel, M. Cisi, and C. Ghislieri. 2020. “The Soft Skills of Accounting Graduates: Perceptions Versus Expectations.” Accounting Education 29(1): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2019.1697937.
Eggen, P., and D. Kauchak. 2001. Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Fazal, F.A., and R. Chakravarty. 2021. “Researcher Development Models and Library Research Support.” Library Hi Tech News 38(4): 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-04-2021-0015.
Fortin, A. and Legault, M. 2010. “Development of Generic Competencies: Impact of a Mixed Teaching Approach on Students’ Perceptions.” Accounting Education: An International Journal 19(1/2): 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280902888195.
García, J.L., and I. de los Ríos. 2021. “Model to Develop Skills in Accounting Students for a 4.0 Industry and 2030 Agenda: From an International Perspective.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(17): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179699.
Hardway, C.L., and M. Stroud. 2014. “Using Student Choice to Increase Students’ Knowledge of Research Methodology, Improve Their Attitudes Toward Research, and Promote Acquisition of Professional Skills.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 26(3): 381–92.
Hiralaal, A. 2012. “Students’ Experiences of Blended Learning in Accounting Education at the Durban University of Technology.” South African Journal of Higher Education 26(2): 316–28.
Lassou, P.J.C., T. Hopper, and C. Ntim, 2021. “Accounting and development in Africa.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 78: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102280
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS). 2016. A Professional Judgement Framework for Financial Reporting Decision Making. Edinburgh: ICAS.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2014. Overall Objective of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with International standards on Auditing. ISA200, Effective December 15, 2009.
Lai, E.R. 2011. “Critical Thinking: A Literature Review.” Pearson’s Research
Reports 6(1): 1–50. http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/
CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL.pdf.
Lopatto, D. 2008. “Exploring the Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences: The SURE Survey.” In Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science, edited by R. Taraban and R.L. Blanton, 112–32. New York: Teachers College Press.
Lopatto, D. 2010. “Undergraduate Research as a High–Impact Student Experience.” Peer Review : Emerging Trends and Key Debates in Undergraduate Education 12(2): 27–31.
Low, M., V. Botes, D. de la Rue, and J. Allen. 2016. “Accounting Employers’ Expectations – The Ideal Accounting Graduates.” The e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching 10(1): 36–57.
Mardiana, H. 2020. “Lecturers’ Attitudes Towards Online Teaching in the Learning Process.” Register Journal 13(1): 77–98. https://doi.org/10.18326/ rgt.v13i1.77–98.
Mhlahlo, A. 2020. “Reflecting on Supervision experiences: Honours students’ Research project in Development studies at the Nelson Mandela University.” South African Journal of Higher Education 34(2): 164–176. https://dx.doi.org/10.20853/34-2-3565
Muzenda, A. 2013. “Lecturers’ Competences and Students’ Academic Performance.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention 3(1): 6–13.
Nath, S.R., K. Jones, and C. Viney. 2021. Understanding the Experiences of Postgraduate Researchers Using the Vitae Researcher Development Framework at UK Universities. https://www.vitae.ac.uk/researchers-professional-development/about-the-vitae-researcher-development-framework/understanding-experience-of-pgrs-using-the-vitae-rdf-at-uk-universities-final-june-2021.pdf.
Nathan, D. 2015. “How South African Societal and Circumstantial Influences Affect the Ethical Standards of Prospective South African Chartered Accountants.” African Journal of Business Ethics 9(1): 42–62. doi:10.15249/9-1-79.
Negash, M., T.T. Lemma, and G Samkin. 2019. “Factors impacting accounting research output in developing countries: An exploratory study.” The British Accounting Review 51: 170–192. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2018.09.003
Pacheco, G., M.-I. Espinoza, S. Cabrera–Arias, and P. Cabrera–Tenecela. 2021. “Lecturers’ Aptitudes, Attitudes and Professional Development in Higher Education at University of Cuenca”. European Journal of Educational Research 10(2): 553–65. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.553.
Papanastasiou, E. 2005. “Factor Structure of the ‘Attitudes Toward Research’ Scale.” Statistics Education Research Journal 4: 16–26.
Parker, J. 2012. “International Comparisons of the Integration of Research Into Undergraduate Degrees in the Social Sciences.” Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly 32(3): 28–33.
Parker, J. 2018. “Undergraduate Research, Learning Gain and Equity: The Impact of Final Year Research Projects.” Higher Education Pedagogies 3(1): 145–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1425097.
Petrella, J.K., and A.P. Jung. 2008. “Undergraduate Research: Importance, Benefits, and Challenges.” International Journal of Exercise Science 1(3): 91–5.
Rudman, R.J., and J. Terblanche. 2011. “Practical Role–Play as an Extension to Theoretical Audit Education: A Conceptualising Aid.” Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research 11: 63–74.
Rudman, R.J., and W. Kruger. 2014. “Using a Group Work Project as an Educational Tool in Management Accounting Education.” International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER) 13(3): 611–28. https://doi.org/10.19030/
iber.v13i3.8598.
Sadler, E., and K. Barac. 2005. “A Study of the Ethical Views of Final Year South African Accounting Students, Using Vignettes as Examples.” Meditari Accountancy Research 13(2): 107–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/102225292
Sahd, L., and R.J. Rudman. 2020. “Audit Trainees’ Perceived Value of Case Studies as an Assessment Tool in Developing and Assessing Professional Skills: A National Perspective.” South African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research 22(1): 1–14.
Seifan, M., N. Lal, and A. Berenjian. 2022. “Effect of Undergraduate Research on Students’ Learning and Engagement.” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 50(2): 326–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/030641902198
Sexton, N.D. 2019. “Accounting Students’ Perceptions: Internal Control Theory Moves Outside the Classroom and Online.” South African Journal of Higher Education 33(4): 271–90.
Sexton, N.D., and R.J. Rudman. 2022. “Program Renewal: Students Perception on Changes to Teaching Pedagogy in Auditing.” South African Journal of Higher Education 36(3): 249–68.
South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA). 2021a. Code of Professional Conduct of the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (Revised 2018) 2021 Edition. Johannesburg: SAICA. https://saicawebprstorage.blob.core.windows.net/uploads/resources/SAICA-Code-of-Professional-Conduct-Revised-2021.pdf.
South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA). 2021b. CA(SA) Competency Framework. Johannesburg: SAICA. https://ca2025.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/DOCUMENT-2-CASA-Competency-Framework-2021.pdf.
Steenkamp, L.P. 2009. “South African Chartered Accountants’ Views on and Expectations of a Career in Academia.” Meditari Accountancy Research 17(1): 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/10222529200900006.
Taras, M. 2003. “To Feedback or Not to Feedback in Student Self–Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28(5): 549–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301678.
Terblanche, E.A.J., and B. de Clercq. 2021. “A Critical Thinking Competency Framework for Accounting Students.” Accounting Education 30: 325–54. doi:10.1080/09639284.2021.1913614.
Terblanche, J., and Y. Waghid. 2021. “Chartered Accountancy and Resistance in South Africa.” South African Journal of Higher Education 35(3): 239–53. https://doi.org/10.20853/35-3-3894.
University of Canberra. n.d. Researcher Development Skills Framework. https://www.canberra.edu.au/research/graduate-research/researcher-development/researcher-development-skills-framework/RDSFSkillAreas.pdf.
University of Edinburgh. n.d. Researcher Development Framework (RDF). https://www.ed.ac.uk/institute-academic-development/research-roles/
research-only-staff/career-management/researcher-framework#:~:text=The%
framework%20has%20been%20developed,the%20characteristics%20of%20excellent%20researchers.
Venter, E.R., and C. de Villiers. 2013. “The Accounting Profession’s Influence on Academe: South African Evidence.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 26(8): 1246–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2012-01027.
Vitae®©. 2010. Researcher Development Framework (Version 2 April 2011). https://www.vitae.ac.uk/vitae-publications/rdf-related/researcher-development-framework-rdf-vitae.pdf/@@download/file/Researcher-Development-Framework-RDF-Vitae.pdf.
Waddell, J., J. Martin, J. Schwind, and J. Lapum. 2017. “A Faculty–Based Mentorship Circle: Positioning New Faculty for Success.” Canadian Journal of Higher Education 46(4): 60–75. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v46i4.186173.
West, A., and Buckby, S. 2023. “Professional Judgement in Accounting and Aristotelian Practical Wisdom.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 36(1): 120–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2020-4949.
Zafra-Gómez. J.L., I. Román-Martínez, and M.E. Gómez-Miranda. 2015. “Measuring the Impact of Inquiry–Based Learning on Outcomes and Student Satisfaction.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40(8): 1050–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.
Zhang, K., S. Wu, Y. Xu, W. Cao, T. Goetz, and E.J. Parks-Stamm. 2021. “Adaptability Promotes Student Engagement Under COVID-19: The Multiple Mediating Effects of Academic Emotion.” Frontiers in Psychology 11: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.633265.
Copyright (c) 2024 Riaan Rudman, Natasha Sexton

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0