Juggling access vs retention and academic performance: The experience of a lecturer teaching in an open, distance e-learning institution
Abstract
In response to the growing number of people requiring access to higher education, the student numbers at distance education institutions grew significantly over the last decade (Unisa 2013; 2020). Unfortunately, many students who enrol at open distance learning institutions are not ready for the demands of distance e-learning. More than half of students enrolled at the open distance learning institution where this study was done drop out and the reasons have been well researched (Joubert and Snyman 2018; Mashile, Fynn, and Matoane 2020).
It seems that universities’ responses to Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4.3 ‒ equal access to technical, vocational and higher education) (Unesco 2021) may unintentionally have created new vulnerabilities for the very group of people they have targeted for progress to end poverty, hunger and discrimination. As nearly a third of all students in South Africa are enrolled at Africa’s largest open distance learning institution (Unisa 2018), it becomes crucial not only to increase access, but simultaneously to prioritise student retention and academic performance.
This raises the question: How can and should lecturers teaching at distance-education institutions optimise the online teaching and learning environment in order to bridge the gap between access targets and academic performance targets? Following an autoethnographic research design, I share my own experiences of teaching two year-modules of the Bachelor of Education (B.Ed) Foundation Phase programme offered via a continuous assessment (CA) approach. Two theoretical frameworks, namely the socio-critical model of Subotzky and Prinsloo (2011, 184), and Luna’s (2018) theory of layers of vulnerability guided my understanding of the challenges associated with distance learning as well as my research design.
My study reveals that the promise of CA does not always convert to optimal performance, and that contextual factors in distance education have a powerful impact on academic achievement despite the effort made by lecturers.
Downloads
References
Anderson T. and J. Dron. 2011. “Three generations of distance education pedagogy.” International Review of Research in Online and Distance Learning 12(3): 80‒97.
Bloom, B. S., M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Vol. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Brown, S. 1999. “Institutional strategies for assessment.” In Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches, ed. S. Brown and A. Glasner, 3‒13. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Brown, M., H. Hughes, M. Keppel, N. Hard, and L. Smith. 2013. “In their own words: Student stories of seeking learning support.” Open Praxis 5(4): 345‒354.
Carpenter, R. and L. Roos. 2020. “Can we afford it? The association between financial aid and time to completion in Accounting Higher Education in South Africa: A literature review.” The Business and Management Review 11(1): 222‒232.
Day, I. N. Z., F. M. Van Blankenstein, P. M. Westenberg, and F. A. Admirall. 2018. “Explaining individual student success using continuous assessment types and student characteristics.” Higher Education Research and Development 37(5): 937‒951.
Carless, D. 2007. “Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44(1): 57‒66.
Darolia, R. 2014. “Working (and studying) day and night: Heterogeneous effects of working on the academic performance of full-time and part-time students.” Economics of Education Review 38: 38‒50.
Department of Higher Education and Training. 2016. Report on the Second National Higher Education Transformation Summit. Durban.
DHET see Department of Higher Education and Training.
Dundes, L. and J. Marx. 2007. “Balancing work and academics in college: Why do students working 10 to 19 hours per week excel?” Journal of College Student Retention 8(1): 107‒120.
Fynn, A. and E. O. Mashile. 2022. “Continuous online assessment at a South African open distance learning e-institution.” Frontiers in Education 7: 791271.
Hernández, R. 2012. “Does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning?” Higher Education 64: 480‒502.
Harper, S. and S. Quay. 2009. “Beyond sameness, with engagement and outcomes for all.” In Student engagement in Higher Education, ed. S. Harper and S. Quay, 1‒15. London: Routledge.
Holmes, N. 2018. “Engaging with assessment: Increasing student engagement through continuous assessment.” Active Learning in Higher Education 19(10): 23‒34.
Joubert, Y. T and A. M. Snyman. 2018. “Challenges experienced with online tutoring in an ODL institution.” Progressio 39(1): 126‒145.
Lewin, T. and M. Mawoyo. 2014. Student access and success: Issues and interventions in South African Universities. The South African Institute for Advancement. Cape Town.
Luna, F. 2018. “Identifying and evaluating layers of vulnerability – a way forward.” Developing World Bioth: 1‒10.
Mashile, E. O., A. Fynn, and M. Matoane. 2020. “Institutional barriers to learning in the South African open distance learning context.” South African Journal of Higher Education 34(2): 129‒145.
Mngomezulu, S., R. Dhunpath, and N. Munro. 2017. “Does financial assistance undermine academic success? Experiences of ‘at-risk’ students in a South African University.” Journal of Education (68): 131‒148.
Neill, C. 2015. “Rising student employment: The role of tuition fees.” Education Economics 23(1): 101‒121.
Poza-Lujan, J. L., C. T. Calafate, J. L. Posadas-Yagüe, and J. C. Cano. 2016. “Assessing the impact of continuous evaluation strategies: Tradeoff between student performance and instructor effort.” IEEE Transactions on Education 59(1): 17‒23.
Republic of South Africa. 2022. General Household Survey 2021. Department Statistics South Africa. https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0318/P03182021.pdf.
Roodt, M. 2018. The South African Education Crisis: Giving power back to parents (The South African Institute of Race Relations Report May 2018). Johannesburg, South Africa.
RSA see Republic of South Africa.
Sandercock, H. 2021. “Archbishop Desmond Tutu quotes: Christian leader’s best lines on everything from apartheid to fishing.” National World 26 December 2021. https://www.nationalworld.com/news/people/archbishop-desmond-tutu-quotes-christian-leaders-best-lines-on-everything-from-apartheid-to-fishing-3507493.
Schreiber, B. and D. Yu. 2016. “Exploring student engagement practices at a South African University: Student engagement as reliable predictor of academic performance.” South African Journal of Higher Education 30(5): 157‒175.
Siebritz, G. 2022. “Unisa under watchful eye as government launces investigation.” https://www.careersportal.co.za/news/unisa-under-watchful-eye-as-government-launches-investigation. (Accessed 14 September 2022).
Subotzky, G. and P. Prinsloo. 2011. “Turning the tide: A socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa.” Distance Education 32(2): 177‒193.
Times Higher Education. 2023. “World University Rankings 2022.” https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2022/world-ranking.
Tinto, V. 1975. “Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research.” Review of Educational Research 45(1): 89‒125.
Triventi, M. 2014. Does working during higher education affect students’ academic progression? Economics of Education Review 41: 1‒13.
Turner, J. and G. Biggs. 2018. “To see or not to see? Comparing the effectiveness of examinations and end of module assessments in online distance learning.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43(7): 1048‒1060.
Unesco. 2021. “Sustainable Development Goal 4 and its targets.” https://en.unesco.org/education2030-sdg4/targets.
Unisa. 2013. “Unisa Annual report 2013.” Unisa, Pretoria, South Africa. https://www.unisa.ac.za/static/corporate_web/Content/News%20and%20Media/Publications/docs/2013_AnnualReport.pdf. (Accessed 7 April 2022).
Unisa. 2018. “Unisa Annual report. Unisa, Pretoria, South Africa.” https://www.unisa.ac.za/sites/corporate/default/News-and-Media/Publications/Annual-reports. (Accessed 7 April 2022).
Unisa. 2020. “Annual report 2020.” Unisa, Pretoria, South Africa. https://www.unisa.ac.za/sites/corporate/default/News-and-Media/Publications/Annual-reports. (Accessed 7 April 2022.)
Unisa. 2023a. “Unisa: Unisa-and-postgraduate-studies.” University of South Africa. https://www.unisa.ac.za/sites/corporate/default/Apply-for-admission/Honours-degrees-&-postgraduate-diplomas/ODL,-Unisa-and-postgraduate-studies/Open-Distance-Learning-(ODL)-is-a-different-way-of-learning.
Unisa. 2023b. “Unisa: Facts-&-figures ‒ Student-enrolments.” University of South Africa. https://www.unisa.ac.za/sites/corporate/default/About/Facts-&-figures/Student-enrolments.
University World News. 2021. “Court sets aside Unisa lower first-year intake decision.” SABC News 13 March 2021. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20210313122112488.
Vahed, A., M. M. Walters, and A. H. A. Ross. 2021. “Continuous assessment fit for purpose? Analysing the experiences of academics from a South African university of technology. Education Inquiry 14(2): 267‒283.
Van Broekhuizen, H. and N. Spaul. 2017. “The Martha effect: The compounding female advantage in South African Higher Education.” Stellenbosch Economic Working Papers: WP14/2017. Stellenbosch. Department of Economics.
Wildschut, A., E. Megbowon, and A. Miselo. 2020. “Impact of funding on academic performance: An exploration of two South African Universities.” Journal of Education 81: 29‒49.
Yorke, M. 2007. Assessment, especially in the first year of higher education: Old principles in new wrapping? Paper presented at the REAP international online conference on assessment design or learner responsibility.
Copyright (c) 2023 Sarlina Gertruida le Roux
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
