Pedagogies of access and success among South African university students in the extended curriculum programmes amidst COVID-19 disruptions

  • P. Nyoni University of Johannesburg
Keywords: Extended Curriculum Programmes (ECP), online pedagogies, academic access, academic success, student exclusion, inclusive models

Abstract

The shift from contact to online classes as universities sought to ensure continuity in its academic enterprise not only happened within a context of uncertainties, hesitancy, and contestations but it had huge implications on pedagogic access and educational success for students from disadvantaged academic and social backgrounds. This article uses an ethnographic approach that draws from a combination of personal interactions with 24 participants who included 12 extended students, 4 parents, 4 academic and 4 administrative staff drawn from two South African universities, one of them in an urban and the other in a rural setting. Two key objectives feature in the article, that is how students in the extended curriculum programme have experienced online pedagogies and with what effects on their academic access and success. The article’s key findings highlight how through inclusive pedagogies with a holistic focus, the influences of societal and university ethos together with teacher competencies and other features become central when exploring pedagogic access and access nuances that confront students particularly the extended students within a setting featuring disruptions resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. The article further makes a case for the relevant pedagogies that can be adopted for dealing with student success issues especially under periods of disruptions. The article further highlights ways in which the move to online pedagogies has not just threatened the success of these students but the very foundations of the extended curriculum programme which aims at addressing issues of student exclusion and success. The article concludes that while the experiences of the extended students represent a microcosm of the broader challenges faced by university students in general, there is evidence that successful inclusive models are those that are holistic with a focus on addressing diverse issues associated with university teaching and learning especially when untested online pedagogies are adopted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

P. Nyoni, University of Johannesburg

Ali Mazrui Centre for Higher Education Studies

References

Amemado, Dodzi. 2020. “COVID-19: An Unexpected and Unusual Driver to Online Education, The Global Picture.” International Higher Education 102: 12‒14.

Arkorful, Valentina and Nelly Abaidoo. 2014. “The role of e-learning, the advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in Higher Education.” International Journal of Education and Research 2(12): 397‒410. https://dx.doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3S1.158.

Borg, Dorinda R. 2009. “The effects of the extended curriculum programme on the social identity of students.” PhD dissertation.

Bourdieu, P. 1986. “The forms of capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education Richardson, ed. J. Westport, 241–258. CT: Greenwood.

Chitra, A. Pauline and Antoney M. Raj. 2018. “E-Learning”. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research 3(Suppl. 1) (April): S11S13. https://dx.doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3S1.158.

Cross, Michael and Vivian Atinde. 2015. “The Pedagogy of the Marginalized: Understanding How Historically Disadvantaged Students Negotiate Their Epistemic Access in a Diverse University Environment.” Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 37(4): 308‒325.

Cross, Michael, Yael Shalem, Judy Backhouse, and Fatima Adam. 2009. “How Undergraduate Students ‘Negotiate’ Academic Performance within a Diverse University Environment.” South African Journal of Higher Education 23(1): 21–42. doi: 10.4314=sajhe.v23i1.44800.

Cross, Michael, Zanele Mkwanazi, and Gillian Klein. (Ed.). 1998. Dealing with Diversity: The Politics of Curriculum in South Africa. Cape Town, Juta.

Cross, Michael. 2002. “Institutionalising Campus Diversity in South Africa Higher Education: Review of Diversity Scholarship and Diversity Education.” Higher Education 1(2): 1‒24.

Cross, Michael. 2004. “Institutionalizing Campus Diversity in South Africa Higher Education: Review of Diversity Scholarship and Diversity Education.” Higher Education 47(4): 387‒410.

Cross, Michael. 2018. “Steering epistemic access in higher education in South Africa: Institutional dilemmas / Michael Cross”. ‒ 1a ed. ‒ Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

García, Emma and Elaine Weiss. 2020. COVID-19 and student performance, equity, and U.S. education policy Lessons from pre-pandemic research to inform relief, recovery, and rebuilding Report. Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC.

Goudeau, Sébastien, Camille Sanrey, Arnaud Stanczak, Antony Manstead, and Céline Darnon. 2021. Nature Human Behaviour 5(October): 1273–1281.

Hodges, Charles, Stephanie Moore, Barb Lockee, Torrey Trust, and Aaron Bond. 2020. “The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning.” V-Tech Works 27 March. vtechworks.lib.vt.edu.https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning.

Kadhila, Ngepathimo and John Nyambe. 2020. “Barriers to the Quality of Emergency Online Pedagogies in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study from the University of Namibia.” Journal of Learning for Development 8(3): 516‒531. http://hdl.handle.net/11599/3989.

Mutizwa Mukute, Buhle Francis, Jane Burt, and Ben de Souza, 2020. “Education in Times of COVID-19: Looking for Silver Linings in Southern Africa’s Educational Responses.” Southern African Journal of Environmental Education 36. DOI 10.4314/sajee.v36i1.7.

Nyoni, Phefumula and Olaide Agbaje. 2021. “Myths Surrounding the Extended Curriculum in South Africa’s Higher Education Sector.” In Transformative Curricula, Pedagogies and Epistemologies, 239‒253. Leiden/ Boston: Brill.

Ogude, Nthabiseng Audrey, I. J. Meyer, Jeanine Mwambakana, and N. E. Mthethwa. 2019. “Can extended curriculum programmes be improved through engagement with students using appreciative inquiry?” South African Journal of Higher Education 33(4): 219‒236.

Rollnick, Marissa. 2010. Identifying potential for equitable access to tertiary level science: Digging for gold. Milton Keynes: Springer Science & Business Media.

Salmi, Jamil. 2020. “Coping with the Present while Building a More Equitable Future.” Lumina Foundation, Indianapolis. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ar/2020/eng/downloads/imf-annual-report-2020.pdf.

Strydom, Sonja and Mine de Klerk. 2020. “Humanizing Pedagogies During a Time of Disruption and Transition a time for reconsideration.” In About Universal Design for Learning, ed. Sonja Strydom, Nicoline Herman, Hanelie Adendorff, and Miné De Klerk. http://udlguidelines.cast.org/.

UNESCO see United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2021. UNESCO Report. Reimagining, Our Futures Together: A new social contract for education. Place de Fontenoy, Paris, France.

Van Voorhis, Frances L., Michelle F. Maier, Joyce L. Epstein, and Chrishana M. Lloyd. 2013. The Impact of Family Involvement on the Education of Children Ages 3 to 8. A Focus on Literacy and Math Achievement Outcomes and Social-Emotional Skills. MDRC.

Published
2022-09-09
How to Cite
Nyoni, P. 2022. “Pedagogies of Access and Success Among South African University Students in the Extended Curriculum Programmes Amidst COVID-19 Disruptions ”. South African Journal of Higher Education 36 (4), 137-53. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-4-5206.
Section
General Articles