Possibilities for long-term shifts in higher education assessment praxis: Reflecting on COVID-19 as a stimulus for change
Abstract
It is widely recognized that assessment impacts on the process and behavior of learning. In this article, we, as academic staff development professionals in two faculties at a research intensive South African university, explore the assessment challenges, processes and behaviours that emerged in the context of Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning during the Covid 19 pandemic. We argue that an analysis of changes in assessment culture and behaviour point to possibilities for a shift from the pre-Covid-19 dominance of the “assessment of learning” paradigm, to an orientation of assessment where both “assessment of learning” and “assessment for learning” are more equitably balanced, with potentially profound implications for shaping the ways students construct their understandings and succeed academically.
References
Archer, Margaret Scotford. 2013. Social morphogenesis, Vol. 1, ed. Margaret Scotford Archer. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bain, Jennifer. 2010. “Integrating student voice: Assessment for empowerment.” Practitioner Research in Higher Education 4(1): 14‒29.
Barradell, Sarah, Simon Barrie, and Tai Peseta. 2018. “Ways of thinking and practising: Highlighting the complexities of higher education curriculum.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 55(3): 266‒275.
Bloxham, Sue and Pete Boyd. 2007. Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education: A Practical Guide. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Blum, Susan. 2020. Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead). West Virginia University Press.
Boud, David and Filip Dochy. 2010. Assessment 2020. Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Boud, David and Nancy Falchikov. 2007. “Introduction: Assessment for the longer term.” In Rethinking assessment in higher education, 3‒13. Routledge.
Boud, Davids and Elizabeth Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design.” Assessment and Evaluation in higher education 38(6): 698‒712.
Brown, Sally. 2020. “Assessment, Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.” https://sally-brown.net.
Butler, Shay Suellen. 2004. “The assessment of complex performance: A socially situated interpretive act.” Harvard Educational Review 74(3): 307‒329.
Carless, David and David Boud. 2018. “The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43(8): 1315‒1325.
Carless, David. 2015. “Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes.” Higher Education 69(6): 963‒976.
Czerniewicz, Laura, Najma Agherdien, Johan Badenhorst, Dina Belluigi, Tracey Chambers, Muntuwenkosi Chili, Magriet De Villiers, et al. 2020. “A wake-up call: Equity, inequality and COVID-19 emergency remote teaching and learning.” Postdigital Science and Education 2(3): 946‒967.
Department of Higher Education and Training. 2013. General and Further Education and Training Qualifications Sub-Framework and Higher Education Qualification Sub-Framework of the National Qualification Framework. Pretoria: Government Printer.
Harari, Yuval. 2018. “Yuval Noah Harari on what the year 2050 has in store for humankind.” https://www.wired.co.uk/article/yuval-noah-harari-extract-21-lessons-for-the-21st-century.
Harrison, Christopher J., Karen D. Könings, Lambert W. T. Schuwirth, Valerie Wass, and Cees P. M. Van der Vleuten. 2017. “Changing the culture of assessment: The dominance of the summative assessment paradigm.” BMC Medical Education 17(1): 1‒14.
Hounsell, Dai, Velda McCune, Jenny Hounsell, and Judith Litjens. 2008. “The quality of guidance and feedback to students.” Higher Education Research and Development 27(1): 55‒67.
Ken, Hyland. 1990. “Providing productive feedback.” ELT Journal 4(4):279–285.
Laurillard, Diana, Patricia Charlton, Brock Craft, Dionisios Dimakopoulos, Dejan Ljubojevic, George Magoulas, Elizabeth Masterman, et al. 2013. “A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29(1): 15‒30.
Meyer, Jan H. F. and Ray Land. 2005. “Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning.” Higher Education 49(3): 373‒388.
Nicol, David, Avril Thomson, and Caroline Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 39(1): 102‒122.
Padayachee, Kershree and Laura Dison. 2020. “University of the Witwatersrand Important considerations for take home assessments.” University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. https://ulwazi.wits.ac.za/courses/189/files/1181/download?wrap=1.
Padayachee, Kershree, Mapula Matimolane, and Rita Ganas. 2018. “Addressing curriculum decolonisation and education for sustainable development through epistemically diverse curricula.” South African Journal of Higher Education 32(6): 288‒304.
Puentedura, Ruben. 2006. “Transformation, technology, and education in the state of Maine.” http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2006_11.html.
Puentedura, Ruben. 2013. “SAMR: Moving from enhancement to transformation.” http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/000095.html.
Race, Phil. 2020. “Assessment for learning.” https://phil-race.co.uk
Sambell, Kay and Liz McDowell. 1998. “The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 23(4): 391‒402.
Sambell, Kay, Liz McDowell, and Chris Montgomery. 2013. Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. Routledge.
Sayed, Yusuf, Tarryn de Kock, and Shireen Motala. 2019. “Between Higher and Basic Education in South Africa: What Does Decolonisation Mean for Teacher Education?” In Decolonisation in Universities: The Politics of Knowledge, ed. Jonathan D. Jansen, 156‒180. Wits University Press. https://doi.org/10.18772/22019083351.
Scharmer, C. Otto. 2009. Theory U: Learning from the future as it emerges. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Stommel, Jessie. 2020. “Ungrading: An FAQ.” Personal blog.
Swaffield, Sue. 2011. “Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 18(4): 433‒449.
Telio, Summer, Rola Ajjawi, and Glenn Regehr. 2015. “The ‘educational alliance’ as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education.” Academic Medicine 90(5): 609‒614.
Villarroel, Verónica, Susan Bloxham, Daniela Bruna, Carola Bruna, and Constanza Herrera-Seda. 2018. “Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43(5): 840‒854.
Winstone, Naomi and David Boud. 2019. “Exploring cultures of feedback practice: The adoption of learning-focused feedback practices in the UK and Australia.” Higher Education Research and Development 38(2): 411‒425.
Winstone, Naomi and David Carless. 2019. Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2022 Kershree Padayachee, Laura Dison
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
