Mediating epistemological access through asynchronous online discussion forums during the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for re-imagining online collaborative self-directed peer engagement and learning

  • R. Moosa University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Keywords: epistemological access, asynchronous online discussion forums, COVID-19 pandemic, self-directed learning, collaborative peer learning, online learning, student engagement

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic precipitated the burgeoning of online learning and asynchronous online discussion forums in higher education due to restrictions on face-to-face teaching and learning interactions. Previous research on asynchronous online discussion forums focused on the processes that enhance or limit discussion threads and how discussion posts develop students’ reflection and critical thinking skills. Although asynchronous online discussion forums are regarded as spaces for interactive learning, very little is known about how they facilitate epistemological access and enable collaborative peer learning interactions during periods of disruption such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The current study explores voluntary asynchronous online discussion forum participation in a non-credit bearing course from a unique angle of mediating epistemological access to online learning. This study draws on connectivist theory as a theoretical framework in a digital age where the student is in control of engagement interaction and information exchange. The central research question posed is how does an asynchronous online discussion forum mediate epistemological access to online learning and facilitate collaborative self-directed peer learning during the COVID-19 pandemic? The present study is underpinned by an inductive qualitative exploratory case study approach. A total of 2 146 discussion posts from 1 348 students across five faculties were downloaded from the learning management system and analysed using thematic analysis. This study indicates that epistemological access using a technology-mediated tool, is best facilitated through agency at the institutional, the instructor and the student level. The findings show that despite academic and technological challenges an online discussion forum enables epistemological access, interactive exchange of information and the formation of collaborative peer learning communities. In an age of digital inequalities, this study provides a starting point to uncover ontological barriers to epistemological access to online learning and signals the importance of integrating epistemological access, pedagogy and technology. This article concludes with implications for re-imagining the design of online multi-modal pedagogy to mediate online collaborative self-directed peer engagement and learning.

Author Biography

R. Moosa, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

Academic Support

References

Abawajy, Jemal. 2012. “Analysis of asynchronous online discussion forums for collaborative learning.” International Journal of Education and Learning 1(2) (September): 11‒21.

Alrushiedat, Nimer and Lorne Olfman. 2013. “Facilitating collaboration and peer learning through anchored asynchronous online discussions.” Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois (August): 15‒17.

Andresen, Martin A. 2009. “Asynchronous discussion forums: Success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 12(1): 249‒257.

Baticulon, Ronnie E., Jinno Jenkin Sy, Nicole Rose I. Alberto, Maria Beatriz C. Baron, Robert Earl C. Mabulay, Lloyd Gabriel T. Rizada, Christl Jan S. Tiu, Charlie A. Clarion, and John Carlo B. Reyes. 2021. “Barriers to online learning in the time of COVID-19: A national survey of medical students in the Philippines.” Medical Science Educator 31(2): 615‒626.

Boud, David. 2001. “Making the move to peer learning.” In Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with each other, ed. David Boud, Ruth Cohen, and Jane Sampson, 1‒20. London: Kogan Page (now Routledge).

Braun, Virginia and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77‒101.

Crawford, Joseph, Kerryn Butler-Henderson, Jürgen Rudolph, Bashar Malkawi, Matt Glowatz, Rob Burton, Paulo Magni, and Sophia Lam. 2020. “COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses.” Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching 3(1): 1‒20.

Creswell, John W. and Cheryl N. Poth. 2018. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, Ch. 4: Five Qualitative Approaches to Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

Curran, Janet A., Andrea L. Murphy, Syed Sibte Raza Abidi, Douglas Sinclair, and Patrick J. McGrath. 2009. “Bridging the gap: Knowledge seeking and sharing in a virtual community of emergency practice.” Evaluation & The Health Professions 32(3): 314‒327.

Durnali, Mehmet. 2020. “The effect of self-directed learning on the relationship between self-leadership and online learning among university students in Turkey.” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 8(1): 129‒165.

Gao, Fei, Tianyi Zhang, and Teresa Franklin. 2013. “Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions.” British Journal of Educational Technology 44(3): 469‒483.

Geng, Shuang, Kris MY Law, and Ben Niu. 2019. “Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 16(1): 1‒22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0.

Harris, Neil and Maria Sandor. 2007. “Developing online discussion forums as student centred peer e-learning environments.” In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings, Ascilite Singapore 2007. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/harris.pdf.

Hewitt, Jim. 2005. “Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 14(4): 567‒589. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1404_4.

Keppell, Mike, Eliza Au, Ada Ma, and Christine Chan. 2006. “Peer learning and learning‐oriented assessment in technology‐enhanced environments.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31(4): 453‒464.

LaTour, Kathryn A. and Hayden N. Noel. 2021. “Self-Directed Learning Online: An Opportunity to Binge.” Journal of Marketing Education 43(2): 174‒188.

Li, Huiyong, Rwitajit Majumdar, Mei-Rong Alice Chen, and Hiroaki Ogata. 2021. “Goal-oriented active learning (GOAL) system to promote reading engagement, self-directed learning behavior, and motivation in extensive reading.” Computers & Education 171: 104239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104239.

Loncar, Michael, Neil E. Barrett, and Gi-Zen Liu. 2014. “Towards the refinement of forum and asynchronous online discussion in educational contexts worldwide: Trends and investigative approaches within a dominant research paradigm.” Computers & Education 73: 93‒110.

Moore, Michael G. 1989. “Three types of interaction.” The American Journal of Distance Education 3(2): 1–6. http://www.ajde.com/index.htm.

Morrow, Wally. 1994. “Entitlement and achievement in education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 13(1): 33‒47.

Mukhtar, Khadijah, Kainat Javed, Mahwish Arooj, and Ahsan Sethi. 2020. “Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era.” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 36(COVID19-S4): S27. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785.

Nandi, Dip, Margaret Hamilton, and James Harland. 2012. “Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses.” Distance Education 33(1): 5‒30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.667957.

Picciano, Anthony G., Jeff Seaman, and I. Elaine Allen. 2010. “Educational transformation through online learning: To be or not to be.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 14(4): 17‒35.

Siemens, George. 2004. “Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. elearnspace.” 1‒7.

So, H‐J. 2009. “When groups decide to use asynchronous online discussions: Collaborative learning and social presence under a voluntary participation structure.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 25(2): 143‒160.

Steele, John, Rick Holbeck, and Jean Mandernach. 2019. “Defining effective online pedagogy.” Journal of Instructional Research 8(2): 5‒8.

Swan, Karen, Jason Schenker, Stephen Arnold, and Chia-Ling Kuo. 2007. “Shaping online discussion: Assessment matters.” In EdMedia and Innovate Learning, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2649‒2656. http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/_xml/wydania/18/390.pdf.

Tadesse, Seble and Worku Muluye. 2020. “The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on education system in developing countries: A review.” Open Journal of Social Sciences 8(10): 159‒170. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.810011.

Thomas, Jenny. 2013. “Exploring the use of asynchronous online discussion in health care education: A literature review.” Computers & Education 69: 199‒215.

Yang, Ya-Ting C. 2008. “A catalyst for teaching critical thinking in a large university class in Taiwan: Asynchronous online discussions with the facilitation of teaching assistants.” Educational Technology Research and Development 56(3): 241‒264.

Zydney, Janet Mannheimer, Aimee deNoyelles, and Kay Kyeong-Ju Seo. 2012. “Creating a community of inquiry in online environments: An exploratory study on the effect of a protocol on interactions within asynchronous discussions.” Computers & Education 58(1): 77‒87.

Published
2022-09-09
How to Cite
Moosa, R. 2022. “Mediating Epistemological Access through Asynchronous Online Discussion Forums During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Re-Imagining Online Collaborative Self-Directed Peer Engagement and Learning”. South African Journal of Higher Education 36 (4), 117-36. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-4-5177.
Section
General Articles