Applying an integrated theoretical lens to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of a computer-based reading development course in higher education
Abstract
South African higher education institutions have implemented different means of developing first-year students’ English language abilities. In 2007, a university of technology introduced a compulsory computer-based reading development course to help first-year students improve their reading ability. A decade after implementation, an investigation into the effectiveness of the course, from the students’ perspectives, became imperative. This article reports on an evaluation of the perceived effectiveness of the course that was undertaken in 2018. A questionnaire survey of 269 Bachelor of Education students, followed by focus group interviews, were used to gather data. The design of the study was informed by a theoretical lens that highlights a set of directives that are underpinned by theory on student engagement and creating motivational conditions. This theory is integrated with theory emanating from studies on technology acceptance and use of the computer as medium. The findings indicate that the course was generally perceived as easy to use, useful and engaging, and that a good level of inclusion had been established. A few aspects needed attention, however, and pointed to the institution’s obligation to ensure that all conditions are adhered to for the creation of a motivational environment for culturally diverse communities. The article not only touches upon the practical implementation of reading development in higher education, but also describes in detail an integrated theoretical lens that can be customised to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of many technologically enhanced teaching and learning applications in higher education.
References
Aljaloud, Abdulaziz, Nicolas Gromik, Willaim Billingsley, and Paul Wing Hing Kwan. 2015. “Research Trends in Student Response Systems: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Learning Technology 10(4): 313‒325. https://doi.org./:10.1504/IJLT.2015.074073.
Babbie, Earl R. and Johann Mouton. 2001. The Practice of Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barkley, E. 2010. Student Engagement Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bertram, Carol. 2006. “Exploring Teachers’ Reading Competences: A South African Case Study.” Open Learning 21(1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510500467874.
Bharuthram, Sharita. 2012. “Making a Case for the Teaching of Reading Across the Curriculum in Higher Education.” South African Journal of Education 32(2): 205‒14. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v32n2a557.
Bozalek, Vivienne, Dick Ng’ambi, and Daniella Gachago. 2013. “Transforming teaching with emerging technologies: Implications for higher education institutions.” South African Journal of Higher Education 27(2): 419‒436.
Coetzee, Mercia, Annette Wilkinson, and Daleen Krige. 2016. “Mapping the Social Media Landscape: A Profile of Tools, Applications and Key Features.” Communitas 21: 178–19. https://doi.org/10.18820/24150525/Comm.v21.12.
Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Davids, Nuraan and Yusef Waghid. 2018. “Indigeneity and African Education: Cultivating Decolonized University Teaching and Learning.” In Indigenous Philosophies of Education Around the World, 61‒81. Routledge.
Davis, Fred D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13(3): 319‒340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
Fredricks, J. A., P. Blumenfeld, J. Friedel, and A. Paris. 2005. “School Engagement.” In What do Children Need to flourish? Conceptualizing and Measuring Indicators of Positive Development, ed. K. A. Moore and L. H. Lippman, 305–321. New York: Springer.
Gachago, Daniela, Eunice Ivala, Judy Backhouse, Jan Petrus Bosman, Vivienne Bozalek, and Dick Ng’ambi. 2013. “Towards a shared understanding of emerging technologies: Experiences in a collaborative research project in South Africa.” The African Journal of Information Systems 5(3): Article 4.
Ginsberg, M. B. and Raymond J. Wlodkowski. 2009. “Professional Learning to Promote Motivation and Academic Performance among Diverse Adults.” In CAEL FORUM and NEWS: Learning Never Ends, ed. Diana Bamford-Reese, Beth Doyle, Becky Klein-Collins and Judith Wertheim, 23–32. November.
Govender, Samantha. 2015. “Students’ perceptions of teaching methods used at South African Higher Education Institutions: Part 1.” South African Journal of Higher Education 29(3): 23‒41.
Grabe, William and Fredericka L. Stoller. 2002. Teaching and Researching Reading. London: Pearson Education Longman.
Harper, S. R. and S. J. Quaye. 2009. “Beyond Sameness, With Engagement and Outcomes for All. Student Engagement in Higher Education.” In Student Engagement in Higher Education, ed. S. R. Harper and S. J. Quaye, 1‒15. London: Routledge.
Howell Major, Claire, Micael S. Harris, and Todd D. Zakrajsek. 2015. Teaching for Learning: 101 Intentionally Designed Educational Activities to put Students on the Path to Success. Routledge.
Klopper, Mariana. 2001. “Leesverryking en Leerontwikkeling as Metodes van Leerderondersteuning vir die Verbetering van Akademiese Prestasie van Eerstejaar Risikostudente” [Reading Enrichment and Learning Development as Methods to Improve learner Performance of At Risk First-year Students]. Master’s thesis, Potchefstroom University.
Kuh, George D. 2008. “Excerpt from High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter.” Association of American Colleges and Universities 14(3): 28–29.
Lee, Chye Seng, Daniel TionHok Tan, and Wee Sen Goh. 2004. The Next Generation of e-Learning: Strategies for Media Rich Online Teaching and Engaged Learning. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET) 2(4): 1‒17. https://doi.org./:10.4018/jdet.2004100101.
Lenong, S. B. and C. S. Masoabi. 2018. “Advancing First-Year Students’ Reading Skills Using Computer Reading Programme to Enhance Learning.” In 1st International Conference on Religion, Social Sciences and Technological Education, ed. M. A. Ibrahim, 238–249. INSIGHT.
Littlejohn, S. W. and K. A. Foss. 2005. Theories of Human Communication. 8th Edition. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Livingstone, Candice, Betsie Klopper, Sanet Cox, and Corrie Uys. 2015. “The Impact of an Academic Reading Programme in the Bachelor of Education (Intermediate and Senior Phase) Degree.” Reading & Writing: Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa 6(1): Article 66. https://doi.org./10.4102/rw.v6i1.66.
Martínez-Torres, M. R., S. L. Toral Marín, F. Barrero García, S. Gallardo Vázquez, M. Arias Oliva and T. Torres. 2008. “A Technological Acceptance of e-learning Tools Used in Practical and Laboratory Teaching, according to the European Higher Education Area 1.” Behaviour & Information Technology 27(6): 495‒505. https://doi.org./:10.1080/01449290600958965.
Merhi, Mohammad I. 2015. “Factors Influencing Higher Education Students to Adopt Podcast: An Empirical Study.” Computers & Education 83: 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.014.
National Survey of Student Engagement. 2013. National Survey of Student Engagement: Origins and Potential. http://nsse.iub.edu/html/origins.cfm.
Nel, Charl, Carisma Dreyer, and Mariaan Klopper. 2004. “An Analysis of Reading Profiles of First-year Students at Potchefstroom University: A Cross-sectional Study and a Case Study.” South African Journal of Education 24(1): 95–103.
Ngwenya, Themba. 2010. “Correlating First-year Law Students’ Profile with the Language Demands of their content Subjects.” Per Linguam 26(1): 74–99. https://doi.org/10.5785/26-1-15.
Pretorius, Elizabeth J. 2002a. “Reading ability and academic performance in South Africa: Are we fiddling while Rome is burning?” Language Matters: Studies in the Languages of Southern Africa 33: 169–196.
Pretorius, Elizabeth J. 2002b. “Reading and Applied Linguistics ‒ A Deafening Silence?” South African and Applied Studies 20(1–2): 91–103. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610209486300.
Ribbens, R. 2008. “Hypnotised by Guntenberg? A report on the reading habits of some learners in academia.” Journal for Language Teaching 42(2): 105–122.
Saritas, Mustfa T. 2006. “Computer-mediated Communication in Higher Education: An Exploration of Knowledge Construction.” PhD diss., Iowa State University.
Sebolai, Kabelo. 2014. “Evaluating Academic Literacy Teaching at a South African University: A Case Study of an Academic Literacy Programme.” Journal for Language Teaching = Ijenali Yekufundzisa Lulwimi = Tydskrif vir Taalonderrig 48(1): 51–69. https://doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v48i1.3.
Trowler, Vicki. 2010. Student Engagement Literature Review. November. The Higher Education Academy.
Venkatesh, Viswanath and Fred D. Davis. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Studies.” Management Science 46(2): 186–204. https://doi.org./10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
Venkatesh, Viswanath. 2000. “Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model.” Information Systems Research 11(4): 342–365. https://doi.org./10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
Waghid, Yusef. 2014. “Islamic education and cosmopolitanism: A philosophical interlude.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 33(3): 329‒342.
Waghid, Zaid and Faiq Waghid. 2016. “Examining digital technology for (higher) education through action research and critical discourse analysis.” South African Journal of Higher Education 30(1): 265‒284.
Wu, Jen-Her and Shu-Chin Wang. 2005. “What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model.” Information & Management 42(5): 719–729.
Copyright (c) 2022 Brigitte Lenong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
