Three key drivers in devising a responsive curriculum in South African higher education institutions

Keywords: decolonisation, disruptive technologies, graduate attributes, responsive curriculum and teaching

Abstract

South African higher education institutions are constantly required to respond to a series of tensions and challenges within higher education curriculum reform. This implies the need for urgent attention to a truly responsive curriculum in South African higher education. This article reports on research involving a critical interpretative literature analysis. Three drivers are identified in devising a responsive curriculum in South African higher education, namely the need for decolonisation, accommodation of disruptive technologies, and features of graduateness in the 21st century. The discussion of each of these drivers is preceded by a brief conceptualisation of the notion of a responsive curriculum. The research conclusion indicates that it should be a strategic priority of each higher education institution in South Africa to acknowledge the three curriculum design drivers as mentioned above, and accordingly upskill and empower academics in the quest for conceptualising and developing a constructively aligned curriculum that is responsive to the ever-changing societal and global needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrade, Maureen Snow. 2018. A responsive higher education curriculum: change and disruptive innovation a responsive higher education curriculum: change and disruptive innovation. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5772/intechopen.80443.

Barrie, Simon. 2004. A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy. Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 261–275.

Barrie, Simon. 2005. Rethinking generic graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development Society of Australia News, 27, 3–6.

Barrie, Simon. 2006. Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51, 215–241.

Barrie, Simon. 2007. A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education 32 no. 4, 439–45.

Barrie, Simon, Hughes, Claire and Smith, Calvin Douglas. 2009. Locating generic graduate attributes in the Australian university curriculum: Taught? mapped? implied? hidden? or ‘missing in action’? Paper presented at the Improving Student Learning through the Curriculum Annual Conference, 1–3 September, Durham.

Bath, Debra, Smith, Calvin, Stein, Sarah and Swann, Richard. 2004. Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research and Development 23, 313–328.

Bonaventura de Sousa Santos. 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Routledge, Taylor & Francis group. London

Boulton, Geoffrey and Lucas, Colin. 2011. What are universities for? Chinese Science Bulletin 56: 2506–2517. 10.1007/s11434-011-4608-7.

Bowden, John, Hart, Gail, King, Bruce, Trigwell, Keith and Watts, Owen. 2000. Generic capabilities of ATN university graduates Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. http://www.clt.uts.edu.au/ATN.grad.cap.project.index.html. Retrieved 1 June 2008)

Bradshaw, David. 1992. Classifications and models of transferable skills. In Arts graduates, their skills and their employment: perspectives for change, edited by Heather Eggens, 39–115. London: Falmer Press.

Breier, Mignonne. 2001. Curriculum restructuring in higher education in post-apartheid South Africa. Bellville: Education Policy Unit, University of Western Cape.

Chapple, Mary and Tolley, Harry. 2000. Embedding key skills in a traditional university. In integrating key skills in higher education, edited by Stephen Fallows and Christine Steven, 67–76. London: Kogan Page.

Christensen, Clayton M. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.

Christensen, Clayton, M. 2008. Disruptive innovation and catalytic change in higher education. Forum Futures 4346: 19.

Council on Higher Education (CHE). 2002. Proceedings of the colloquium on building relationships between higher education and the private and public sectors, 27–28 June 2002. http://www.che.ac.za/documents/d000037/Colloquium_Report.pdf.

Daniels, Jeannie and Brooker, Jennifer. 2014. Student identity development in higher education: implications for graduate attributes and work-readiness. Educational Research, 56, 65–76.

Department of Education (DOE). 1997. Education White Paper 3: a programme for the transformation of higher education. Government Gazette No. 18207, 15 August. Pretoria: Government Printers.

Department of Education (DOE). 2001. National Plan for Higher Education. Pretoria: DoE.

Department of Education (DOE). 2002. The restructuring of the higher education system in South Africa. Report of the National Working Group, 31 January.

Dowling, Dolina and Seepe, Sipho. 2003. “Towards a responsive curriculum”. In A tale of three countries: social sciences curriculum transformations in South Africa, edited by Naude, Piet and Cloete, Nico. Lansdowne, Cape Town: Juta.

Fanon, Frantz. 2004. “Algeria Unveiled”. In P. Duara, Decolonization: Perspectives from Now and Then. London: Routledge, 2004.

Fataar, Aslam. 2018. Decolonising education in South Africa: perspectives and debates. Educational Research for Social Change (ERSC) 7, Special Issue June 2018.

Flavin, Michael. 2012 Research in learning technology supplement. ALT-C 2012 Conference Proceedings Disruptive technologies in higher education. King’s Learning Institute, King’s College, London: UK. Received 20 February 2012; final version received 20 June 2012).

Healey, Mick, Flint, Abbi, and Harrington, Kathy. 2014. Developing students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy

Heick, Terry. 2019. A disruption model: how innovation in education causes change. Updated on 11 November 2019. https://www.teachthought.com/the-future-of-learning/the-learning-innovation-cycle-how-disruption-creates-lasting-change. Retrieved November 2020.

Hill, Jennifer. 2013. Celebrating the scholarship of teaching and learning. Planet, 27, 1–5.

Human, Nadia Emelia. 2017. The role of a responsive curriculum in optimising learning in Higher education. Doctoral Thesis. Pretoria. UNISA.

Jones, Anna. 2009. Redisciplining generic attributes: the disciplinary context in focus. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 85–100.

Litchfield, Andrew, Frawley, Jessica and Nettleton, Skye. 2010. Contextualising and integrating into the curriculum the learning and teaching of work-ready professional graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 29, 519–534.

Mbembe, Achille Joseph. 2016. Decolonizing the university: New directions. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 15, no. 1: 29–45.

Miji, Andile and Ditsele, Rampofeng. 2018. 21st century graduates attributes: exploring perspectives in undergraduate curricula at a South African university of technology. Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria: South Africa.

Moubayed, Abdallah, Injadat, Mohammad Noor, Nassif, Ali Bou, Lutfiyya, Hanan and Shami, Abdallah. 2018. E-learning: challenges and research opportunities using machine learning data analytics. IEEE Access, 6: 39117–39138. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2851790.

Myklebust, Jan Petter and Smidt, Hanne. 2021. What is the role of universities in global upskilling? University World News. The Global Window on Higher Education. Accessed 29 January 2021

National Commission on Higher Education (NCHE). 1996. National Commission on Higher Education Report: a framework for transformation. Pretoria: Government Printer

Ogude, Nthabiseng, Nel, Heather and Oosthuizen, Martin. 2016. The challenge of curriculum responsiveness in South African higher education. https://www.academia.edu/28280625. Retrieved November 2020.

Padayachee, Kershree, Matimolane, Mapula and Ganas, Rieta. 2018 Addressing curriculum decolonisation and education for sustainable development through epistemically diverse curricula. South African Journal of Higher Education 32, no. 6: 288–304.

Singh, Mala. 2001. Re-inserting the ‘public good’ into higher education. Kagisano – CHE Higher Education Discussion Series, 1.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 271‒313. Urbana and Chicago. University of Illinois.

University of Pretoria (UP). 2016. Draft framework document. Reimagining curricula for a just university in a vibrant democracy. Work stream on curriculum transformation at the University of Pretoria, South Africa, Pretoria.

Voogt, Joke and Roblin, Natalie Pareja. 2012. A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44 no. 3, 299-321. DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2012.668938.

Whalley, Brian, Saunders, Angharad, Lewis, Robin, Buenemann, Michaela, and Sutton, Paul. 2011. Curriculum development: Producing geographers for the 21st century. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35, 379–393.

Wa Thiong’o, Ngugi. 1993. Moving the centre: The struggle for cultural freedoms. James Currey.

Yadav, Kusum. 2018. Disruptive innovative technologies in higher education. International Journal of Advanced Education and Research ISSN: 2455-5746; Impact Factor: RJIF 5.34 Received: 23-11-2018; Accepted: 25-12-2018 www.alleducationjournal.com, 4, no. 1; January 2019, 49–54.

Published
2024-11-30
How to Cite
Human-Hendricks, N., and C. Meier. 2024. “Three Key Drivers in Devising a Responsive Curriculum in South African Higher Education Institutions”. South African Journal of Higher Education 38 (6), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.20853/38-6-5082.
Section
General Articles