Active learning in an online postgraduate research module: Perceptions of accounting students and lecturers
Abstract
Chartered accountancy education offered by universities in South Africa has traditionally been characterised by passive face-to-face (F2F) learning approaches. Literature, however, has pointed out that active learning can enhance student learning, engagement, and motivation. Moreover, employing active online learning could facilitate the development of digital and critical thinking competencies in accounting students, the importance of which is increasingly emphasised. In response to this, a more traditional and passive F2F lecture week (as part of a postgraduate course on research in accounting) was redesigned during the COVID-19 pandemic to be presented fully online, based on the active learning principles found in Laurillard’s Six Ways of Learning. A questionnaire was administered to investigate the perceptions of both students and lecturers as to whether the redesign led to improved learning and competency development, and to increased engagement and motivation. Although some students were resistant to the change in learning approach from passive to active, respondents felt that the active learning tasks led to increased engagement and enhanced learning by students. Student resistance should be managed in future redesign processes to minimise the effect thereof on learning outcomes, possibly through change management principles such as purposeful communication regarding the benefits and requirements of active learning. Respondents reported that the online learning environment provided students with increased flexibility, but that this flexibility had to be managed through self-regulation or monitoring by lecturers. Online learning also led to feelings of disconnect (between lecturers and students, within the student group and in relation to the content). Such disconnect could be alleviated by applying a blended learning approach in future, using the advantages of both the F2F and the online environment. The results of this study are important to lecturers seeking to design courses that engage and motivate students, enhance learning, and allow the development of the competencies required of the accountants of the future.
References
Al-Htaybat, K., L. Von Alberti-Alhtaybat, and Z. Alhatabat. 2018. “Educating digital natives for the future: Accounting educators’ evaluation of the accounting curriculum.” Accounting Education 27(4): 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1437758.
Artino Jr., A. R. and J. M. Stephens. 2009. “Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online.” Internet and Higher Education 12: 146‒151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001.
Beyleveld, M., J. J. R. de Villiers, and W. J. Fraser. 2019. “The use of active learning in a private higher education institution: The lecturer’s perspective.” South African Journal of Higher Education 33(2): 16–28. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-2-2804.
Burch, G. F., N. A. Heller, J. J. Burch, R. Freed, and S. A. Steed. 2015. “Student engagement: Developing a conceptual framework and survey instrument.” Journal of Education for Business 90: 224‒229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1019821.
Butler, R. and S. P. J. von Wielligh. 2012. “Using guest lecturers to address the gap between theory and practice in auditing studies at a South African university ‒ a case study.” The Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research 13(1): 59–62. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC120955.
Carr-Chellman, A. and P. Duchastel. 2000. “The ideal online course.” British Journal of Educational Technology 31(3): 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00154.
Felder, R. M. and R. Brent. 2016. Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hake, R. R. 1998. “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses.” American Journal of Physics 66: 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809.
Helfaya, A. 2019. “Assessing the use of computer-based assessment-feedback in teaching digital accountants.” Accounting Education 28(1): 69‒99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1501716.
Holzweiss, P. C., S. A. Joyner, M. B. Fuller, S. Henderson, and B. Young. 2014. “Online graduate students’ perceptions of best learning experiences.” Distance Education 35(3): 311‒323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955262.
Hsieh, H. F. and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15(9): 1277‒1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
Keevy, M. 2020. “Core subjects in accounting academic programmes: Development of pervasive skills.” South African Journal of Accounting Research 34(2): 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2020.1727081.
Laurillard, D. 2012. Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge.
Lento, C. 2015. “Promoting active learning in introductory financial accounting through the flipped classroom design.” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 8(1): 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2015-0005.
Malan, M. 2020. “Student engagement in a fully online accounting module: An action research study.” South African Journal of Higher Education 34(4): 112–129. https://doi.org/10.20853/34-4-3683.
Malan, M. and V. van Dyk. 2021. “Perceived pervasive skills acquired through educational games in an accounting undergraduate degree.” Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences 14(1): a555. https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v14i1.555.
Murdoch B. and P. W. Guy. 2002. “Active learning in small and large classes.” Accounting Education 11(3): 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928021000031448.
Papageorgiou, E. 2021. “Students’ perceptions of learning, using interactive notes.” South African Journal of Higher Education 35(2): 207–229. https://doi.org/10.20853/35-2-3975.
Prince, M. 2004. “Does active learning work? A review of the research.” Journal of Engineering Education 93(3): 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
Rosenbaum, D., E. More, and P. Steane. 2018. “Planned organisational change management. Forward to the past? An exploratory literature review.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 31(2): 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2015-0089.
Serrano, D. R., M. A. Dea-Ayuela, E. Gonzalez-Burgos, A. Serrano-Gil, and A. Lalatsa. 2019. “Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning.” European Journal of Education 54: 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12330.
Simoes, P. M. M. and M. Esposito. 2014. “Improving change management: how communication nature influences resistance to change.” Journal of Management Development 33(4): 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-05-2012-0058.
Sugahara, S. and S. Dellaportas. 2018. “Bringing active learning into the accounting classroom.” Meditari Accountancy Research 26(4): 576–597. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2017-0109.
Terblanche, E. A. J. and B. De Clercq. 2020. “Factors to consider for effective critical thinking development in auditing students.” South African Journal of Accounting Research 34(2): 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2019.1669293.
Tseng, H. and E. J. Walsh Jr. 2016. “Blended versus traditional course delivery: Comparing students’motivation, learning outcomes, and preferences.” The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 17(1): 43–52.
Viviers, H. A., J. P. Fouché, and G. M. Reitsma. 2016. “Developing soft skills (also known as pervasive skills): Usefulness of an educational game.” Meditari Accountancy Research 24(3): 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2015-0045.
White, P. J., I. Larson, K. Styles, E. Yuriev, D. R. Evans, P. K. Rangachari, J. L. Short, et al. 2016. “Adopting an active learning approach to teaching in a research-intensive higher education context transformed staff teaching attitudes and behaviours.” Higher Education Research & Development 35(3): 619-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1107887.
Wilmot, L. J. and A. Merino. 2015. “A personal reflection of the impact of adopting a student-centred teaching approach to influence accounting students’ approaches to learning.” South African Journal of Higher Education 29(6): 257–274. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC191477.
Copyright (c) 2022 Gretha Steenkamp, Orlando Van Schalkwyk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
