Strategies to realise the decoloniality of the Comparative and International Education curriculum in South African higher education

  • K. J. Maluleka University of South Africa, Pretoria
Keywords: comparative education, curriculum, decoloniality, higher education

Abstract

This article sought to investigate the implementation of strategies to realise the decoloniality of the Comparative and International Education (CIE) curriculum in South African higher education. This is a qualitative study in which the participants were selected from CIE senior lecturers and students who are registered for the CIE module. Data was collected from four senior lecturers and nine students who were identified using multi-stage sampling. Data pertaining to the experiences of these academics and students were collected by semi-structured interviews. The study revealed numerous decolonial challenges, including people valuing the Western system more than their own system and a reluctance to move out of their comfort zone. Valuable information was received from the participants suggesting strategies to realise the decoloniality of the CIE curriculum in South African higher education. Based on the suggestions made by participants, this study recommends ways in which to implement strategies of the decoloniality of the CIE curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

K. J. Maluleka, University of South Africa, Pretoria

Senior Lecturer

Department of Educational Foundations

References

Afdal, H. W. 2019. “The promises and limitations of international comparative research on teacher education.” European Journal of Teacher Education 42(2): 258–275. DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2019.1566316.

Bacalja, A. 2020. “Decolonising the curriculum for the middle years student: An evidence-based approach to exploring Black Lives Matter.” Idiom 56(2): 54–56. doi/10.3316/informit.307294980616686.

Beech, J. 2006. “The theme of educational transfer in comparative education: A view over time.” Research in Comparative and International Education 1(1): 1–13. doi: 10.2304/rcie.2006.1.1.2.

Chilisa, B. 2012. Indigenous research methodologies. USA: SAGE Publishers.

Costandius, E., M. Blackie, I. Nell, R. Malgas, N. Alexander, E. Setati, and M. Mckay. 2018. “#Feesmustfall and decolonising the curriculum: Stellenbosch University students’ and lecturers’ reactions.” South African Journal of Higher Education 32(2): 65‒85. http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/32-2-2435.

D’Sena, P. 2019. “Decolonising the curriculum. Contemplating academic culture(s), practice and strategies for change.” In Learning Connections 2019: Spaces, People, Practice, ed. B. Supple and T. Delahunty, 58‒62. University College Cork, Cork, Ireland, 5‒6 December. doi: 10.33178/LC.2019.13.

Epstein, E. H. and K. J. Caroll. 2005. “Abusing ancestors: Historical functionalism and the postmodern deviation in comparative education.” Comparative Education Review 49(1): 62–88.

Fataar, A. 2018. “Decolonising education in South Africa: Perspectives and debates.” Educational Research for Social Change 7(SPE): vi–ix.

Gumbo, M. T. 2020. “What does decolonising Technology Education mean?” In Decolonisation of technology education: African indigenous perspectives, ed. M. T. Gumbo. New York: Peter Lang Publisher.

Haradhan, M. 2018. “Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects.” Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People 7(1): 23‒48. https://scholarblogs.emory.edu/postcolonialstudies/2014/06/20/colonial-education/. (Accessed on 20 March 2021).

Kamwendo, G. H. 2016. “The new language of instruction policy in Malawi: A house standing on a shaky foundation.” International Review of Education 62(2): 221–228.

Maluleka, J. K 2020. “A framework of a Culturally Responsive Methodology of Technology Education.” In Decolonisation of technology education: African indigenous perspectives, ed. M. T. Gumbo. New York: Peter Lang Publisher.

Mart, Ç. T. and A. Toker. 2010. “How did British colonial education in Africa become a reason for decolonization?” 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 8–9, Sarajevo.

Msila, V. and M. T. Gumbo. 2016. Africanising the curriculum: Indigenous perspectives and Theories. African Sun Media, SUN PReSS.

Prasad, A. 2003. “The graze of the other: Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis.” In Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis: A critical engagement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.

Rappleye, J. 2020. “Comparative education as cultural critique.” Comparative Education 56(1): 39–56. DOI: 10.1080/03050068.2019.1701247.

Rukundwa, L. S. and A. G. Van Aarde. 2007. “The formation of postcolonial theory.” HTS 63(3): 1171–1194.

Silverman, D. 2001. Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. 2nd Edition. London: Sage.

Southard, J. 2017. Colonial education. https://scholarblogs.emory.edu/postcolonialstudies/2014/06/20/colonial-education. (Accessed on 04 June 2023).

Takayama, K., A. Sriprakash, and R. Connell. 2016. “Toward a postcolonial comparative and international education.” Comparative Education Review 61(S1). DOI: 10.1086/690455. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311945633.

Woldegiorgis, E. T. 2020. “Decolonising a higher education system which has never been colonised.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 53(9): 894‒906. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1835643.

Wolhuter, C. C. 2020. “The scholarly field of comparative and international education and its promise in the Global South.” In Decolonising education in the Global South: Historical and comparative international perspectives, ed. C. C. Wolhuter, J. Seroto, and M. N. Davids, 139–153. Cape Town: Pearson.

Published
2023-07-02
How to Cite
Maluleka, K. J. 2023. “Strategies to Realise the Decoloniality of the Comparative and International Education Curriculum in South African Higher Education”. South African Journal of Higher Education 37 (3), 125-39. https://doi.org/10.20853/37-3-4839.
Section
General Articles