The extent of coaching behaviour and practices in supervision processes of PhD students
Abstract
The extent to which coaching behaviour is practiced in PhD supervision is unknown. Supervision and elements of supervision have been studied extensively but not coaching and supervision. The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which coaching behaviours were practiced by supervisors while engaging with PhD students during supervision.
A cross sectional survey using a self-administered structured questionnaire was used on an online platform (REDCap). Descriptive and correlational statistics were used to determine the extent to which each coaching and supervision phenomenon were practiced.
Three hundred and eighty students registered for a PhD for longer than six months in a Faculty of Health Sciences were invited to participate in the study and 76 participated. Low to moderate levels in coaching behaviour and practice, personal support, supervisor availability and research academic support are reported. Personal support and the level of satisfaction with supervision were significant predictors of coaching behaviour and practice.
This study established the extent of different supervisory behaviours and coaching behaviour and practice among supervisors. Coaching in this study was not practised largely with a third of the students interviewed experiencing coaching behaviour and practice.
Downloads
References
Abdi, H. and L. J. Williams. 2010. “Principal component analysis.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2(4): 433‒459.
Askew, C., R. Dixon, R. McCormick, K. Callaghan, G. Wang, and B. Shulruf. 2016. “Facilitators and barriers to doctoral supervision: A case study in health sciences.” Issues in Educational Research 26(1): 1‒9.
Baptista, A. V. 2011. “Challenges to doctoral research and supervision quality: A theoretical approach.” 3rd World Conference on Educational Sciences. Istanbul, Turkey. Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioral Sciences 15: 3576‒3581.
Boehe, D. M. 2016. “Supervisory styles: A contingency framework.” Studies in Higher Education 41(3): 1‒16. 10.1080/03075079.2014.927853.
Bresser, F. and C. Wilson. 2010. “What is coaching.” Excellence in coaching: The industry guide 2.
Cleary, M., N. Siegfried, P. Escott, and G. Walter. 2016. “Super research or super-researched?: When enough is enough ....” Issues in mental health nursing 37(5): 380‒382.
Cox, E., T. Bachkirova, and D. A. Clutterbuck. 2014. The complete handbook of coaching. Sage.
Cribb, A. and S. Gewirtz. 2006. “Doctoral student supervision in a managerial climate.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 16(3): 223‒236. 10.1080/09620210601037787.
Devos, C., N. van der Linden, G. Boudrenghien, A. Azzi, M. Frenay, B. Galand, and O. Klein. 2015. “Doctoral supervision in the light of the three types of support promoted in self-determination theory.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 10: 438‒464.
Fazel, P. 2013. “Teacher-coach-student coaching model: A vehicle to improve efficiency of adult institution.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 97: 384‒391.
Geber, H. 2010. “Coaching for accelerated productivity in Higher Education.” International Journal of Evidence based Coaching and Mentoring 8(2): 64‒78.
Geber, H. and A. Bentley. 2012. “Can low-cost support programmes with coaching accelerate doctoral completion in Health Science Faculty academics?” Perspectives in Education 30(3): 30‒38.
Godskesen, M. and S. Kobayashi. 2015. “Coaching doctoral students – a means to enhance progress and support self-organisation in doctoral education.” Studies in Continuing Education: 1‒17.
Grant, A. M., L. Curtayne, and G. Burton. 2009. “Executive coaching enhances goal attainment, resilience and workplace well-being: A randomised controlled study.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 4(5): 396‒407.
Gu, J., C. He, and H. Liu. 2015. Supervisory styles and graduate student creativity: The mediating roles of creative self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Studies in Higher Education: 1‒22.
Harris, P. A., R. Taylor, B. L. Minor, V. Elliott, M. Fernandez, L. O’Neal, L. McLeod, G. Delacqua, F. Delacqua, and J. Kirby. 2019. “The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.” Journal of biomedical informatics 95: 103208.
Harris, P. A., R. Taylor, R. Thielke, J. Payne, N. Gonzalez, and J. G. Conde. 2009. “Research electronic data capture (REDCap) ‒ a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.” Journal of Biomedical Informatics 42(2): 377‒381.
Heath, T. 2002. “A quantitative analysis of PhD students’ views of supervision.” Higher Education Research and Development 21(1): 41‒53.
Ismail, H. M., F. A. Majid, and I. S. Ismail. 2013. “‘It’s complicated’ Relationship: Research Students’ Perspective on Doctoral Supervision.” Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioral Sciences 90(0): 165‒170.
Ives, G. and G. Rowley. 2005. “Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph. D. students’ progress and outcomes.” Studies in Higher Education 30(5): 535‒555.
Langan, E., C. Blake, and C. Lonsdale. 2013. “Systematic review of the effectiveness of interpersonal coach education interventions on athlete outcomes.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 14(1): 37‒49.
Lee, A. 2008. “How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33(3): 267‒281.
Lee, A. and B. Green. 2009. “Supervision as metaphor.” Studies in Higher Education 34(6): 615‒630.
Manathunga, C. 2005a. “The development of research supervision: ‘Turning the light on a private space’.” International Journal for Academic Development 10(1): 17‒30.
Manathunga, C. 2005b. “Early warning signs in postgraduate research education: A different approach to ensuring timely completions.” Teaching in Higher Education 10(2): 219‒233.
McCallin, A. and S. Nayar. 2011. “Postgraduate research supervision: a critical review of current practice.” Teaching in Higher Education 17(1): 63‒74.
Moses, I. 1984. “Supervision of Higher degree students ‒ Problem Areas and possible solutions.” Higher Education Research and Development 3(2): 153‒165.
Mouton, J. 2007a. “Post-graduate studies in South Africa: Myths, misconceptions and challenges” 21. http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/high/high_v21_n8_a6.pdf.
Mouton, J. 2007b. “Post-graduate studies in South Africa: Myths, misconceptions and challenges.” South African Journal of Higher Education 21(8): 1078‒1090. DOI: 10.4314/sajhe.v21i8.25761.
Mouton, J., N. Boshoff, and M. James. 2015. “A survey of doctoral supervisors in South Africa.” South African Journal of Higher education 29(2).
Nulty, D., M. Kiley, and N. Meyers. 2009. Promoting and recognising excellence in the supervision of research students: An evidence‐based framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34(6): 693‒707.
Overall, N. C., K. L. Deane, and E. R. Peterson. 2011. “Promoting doctoral students’ research self-efficacy: Combining academic guidance with autonomy support.” Higher Education Research & Development 30(6): 791‒805.
Palmer, S. and A. Whybrow. 2018. Handbook of coaching psychology: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Pearson, M. and A. Brew. 2002. “Research Training and Supervision Development.” Studies in Higher Education 27(2): 135‒150.
Peterson, D. B. 1996. “Executive coaching at work: The art of one-on-one change.” Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 48(2): 78.
Russell, A. 1996. Postgraduate research: student and supervisor views. The Flinders University of South Australia.
Sidhu, G. K., S. Kaur, C. Y. Fook, and F. W. Yunus. 2013a. “Postgraduate Supervision: Exploring Malaysian Students’ Experiences.” 6th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2012). Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Sidhu, G. K., S. Kaur, C. Y. Fook, and F. W. Yunus. 2013b. “Postgraduate Supervision: Exploring Malaysian Students’ Experiences.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 90: 133‒141.
Thomas, G. 2013. How to do your research project. 2nd Education. London UK: SAGE.
Wales, S. 2002. Why coaching? Journal of Change Management 3(3): 275‒282.
Whitmore, J. 2010. Coaching for performance: Growing human potential and purpose: the principles and practice of coaching and leadership. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Woolderink, M., K. Putnik, H. van der Boom, and G. Klabbers. 2015. “The voice of PhD candidates and PhD supervisors. A qualitative exploratory study amongst PhD candidates and supervisors to evaluate the relational aspects of PhD supervision in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 10: 217‒235.
World Health Organization. 2001. “World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 79(4): 373‒374.
Zhao, C. M., C. M. Golde, and A. C. McCormick. 2007. “More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 31(3): 263‒281.
Copyright (c) 2021 Hellen Myezwa, Hillary Geber
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
