External factors affecting blackboard learning management system adoption by students: Evidence from a historically disadvantaged higher education institution in South Africa
Abstract
Learning Management Systems (LMS) have the ability to transform learning experiences of students in Higher Education Institutions (HEI). In addition to the developmental benefits, LMS assist teaching and learning during student unrests, a common feature in historically disadvantaged institutions in South Africa. Regardless of the benefits of LMS platforms such as Blackboard, the utilisation by university students at the institution under study has been very low. Applying cross sectional electronic survey, this study identifies the key factors influencing technology adoption, as identified in the General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL), behind perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness in the adoption of technology. A sample of 125 students at a historically disadvantaged institution in South Africa was considered for the study. Data was collected to understand their perceptions on use of Blackboard Learning Management System (BB) for learning. Data was analysed with SmartPLS statistical analysis software. Results show that perceived ease of use of BB is influenced by computer self-efficacy, computer amusement and computer anxiety whilst perceived usefulness of BB is influenced by subjective norm and computer enjoyment. The findings also show computer experience to significantly affect computer self-efficacy and computer self-efficacy to affect computer enjoyment. The article presents the external factors that affect the usage of LMS at one of the historically disadvantaged HEI in South Africa. HEI leadership has to prioritise the identified external factors to increase chances of acceptance and utilisation of Blackboard by learners.
References
Abdullah, F., R. Ward, and E. Ahmed. 2016. “Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Influence of external variables on students’ perceptions of e-portfolios.” https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42582523.pdf (Accessed 14 March 2019).
Abdullah, F. and R. Ward. 2016. “Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors.” Computers in Human Behavior 56: 238–256. doi: 10.1016/J.CHB.2015.11.036.
Abramson, J., M. Dawson, and J. Stevens. 2015. “An Examination of the Prior Use of E-Learning Within an Extended Technology Acceptance Model and the Factors That Influence the Behavioral Intention of Users to Use M-Learning.” SAGE Open 1–9. doi: 10.1177/2158244015621114.
Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., A. Hernández-García, and F. J. Pascual-Miguel. 2014. “Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: Differences between higher education and lifelong learning.” Computers in Human Behavior 34: 301‒314. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035.
Al-Ammary, J. H., A. K. Al-Sherooqi, and H. K. Al-Sherooqi. 2014. “The Acceptance of Social Networking as a Learning Tools at University of Bahrain.” International Journal of Information and Education Technology 4(2): 208–214. doi: 10.7763/IJIET.2014.V4.400.
Al-Gahtani, S. S. 2016. “Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model.” Applied Computing and Informatics 12(1): 27–50. doi: 10.1016/J.ACI.2014.09.001.
Alenezi, A. R., A. M. Abdul Karim, and A. Veloo. 2010. “An Empirical Investigation into the Role of Enjoyment, Computer Anxiety, Computer Self-Efficacy and Internet Experience in Influencing the Students’ Intention to Use E-Learning: A Case Study from Saudi Arabian Governmental Universities.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 9(4): 22‒34.
Alturki, U. T., A. Aldraiweesh, and D. Kinshuck. 2016. “Evaluating the Usability and Accessibility of LMS ‘Blackboard’ at King Saud University.” Contemporary Issues in Education Research 9(1): 33‒44. htts://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v9i1.9548 (Accessed 18 February 2020).
Andreu, H. B. and N. Miguel. 2019. “An experimental study of the inclusion of technology in higher education.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20188 (Accessed 20 February 2020).
Andreu, H. B. and M. Nussbaum. 2009. “An experimental study of the inclusion of technology in higher education.” Computer Applications in Engineering Education 17(1): 100‒107.
Awofala, A. O. A., S. O. Akinoso, and A. O. Fatade. 2017. “Attitudes towards computer and computer self-efficacy as predictors of pre-service mathematics teachers’ computer anxiety.” Acta Didactica Napocensia 10(2): 91‒108.
Awofala, A., O. Olabiyi., A. Awofala, A. Arigbabu, A. Fatade, and U. Udeani. 2019. “Attitudes toward Computer, Computer Anxiety and Gender as determinants of Pre-service Science, Technology, and Mathematics Teachers’ Computer Self-efficacy.” Digital Education Review 36: 51–67.
Baki, R., B. Birgoren, and A. Aktepe. 2018. “A meta analysis of factors affecting perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in the adoption of e-learning systems.” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 19(4): Article 1.
Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Blackboard. 2018. Fundamentals of digital teaching and learning. Digital teaching and learning series.
Borboa, D., M. Joseph, D. Spake, and A. Yazdanparast. 2014. “Perceptions and Use of Learning Management System Tools and Other Technologies in Higher Education: A Preliminary Analysis.” Journal of Learning in Higher Education 10(2): 17–23.
Cassidy, S. and P. Eachus. 2002. “Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 26(2): 133‒153.
Chao C. M. 2019. “Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model.” Frontiers in Psychology 10(1652). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652 (Accessed 18 February 2020).
Chetty, R. and S. Pather. 2015. Challenges in Higher Education in South Africa. In Telling stories differently. Engaging 21st century students through digital storytelling, ed. J. Condy, 1‒6. Stellenbosch: SUN MeDIA.
Ching-Ter, C., J. Hajiyev, and C. R. Su. 2017. “Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-learning approach.” Computers and Education 111: 128–143.
Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13(3): 319–340. doi: 10.1155/2013/591796.
Dawson, S. P., E. Heathcote, and G. Poole. 2010. “Harnessing ICT potential: The adoption and analysis of ICT systems for enhancing the student learning experience.” International Journal of Educational Management 24(2): 116‒128.
Dede, C. 1998. Learning with technology. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Delgado-Almonte, M., H. B. Andreu, and L. Pedraja-Rejas. 2010. “Information Technologies in Higher Education: Lessons Learned in Industrial Engineering.” Educational Technology & Society 13(4): 140‒154.
Durodolu, O. 2016. “Technology Acceptance Model as a predictor of using information systems to acquire information literacy skills.” Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) 1450. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1450 (Accessed 18 February 2020).
Duygu, F. C. and Ö. Sevgi. 2013. “A model for instructors’ adoption of learning management systems: Empirical validation in higher education context.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 12(2): 13‒25.
Fagan, M. H., S. Neill, and B. R. Wooldridge. 2003. “An empirical investigation into the relationship between computer self-efficacy, anxiety, experience, support and usage.” Journal of Computer Information Systems: 95‒104.
Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Forcheri, P. and M. T. Molfino. 2000. ICT as a tool for learning to learn. In Communications and networking in Education, ed. D. M. Watson and T. Downes, 175‒184. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Fornell, C. R. and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.” JMR 18(1): 39–50.
Green, S. M., M. Weaver, D. Voegeli, D. Fitzsimmons, J. Knowles, M. Harrison, and K. Shephard. 2006. “The Development and Evaluation of the Use of a Virtual Learning Environment (Blackboard 5) to Support the Learning of Pre-qualifying Nursing Students Undertaking a Human Anatomy and Physiology Module.” Nurse Education Today 26(5): 388‒395. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.11.008.
Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hanif, A., A. F. Siddiqi, and Z. Jalil. 2019. “Are Computer Experience and Anxiety Irrelevant? Towards a Simple Model for Adoption of E-Learning Systems.” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy 9(5): 112‒125.
Hasbullah, N. A., A. Osman, S. Abdullah, S. N. Salahuddin, N. F. Ramleec, and H. M. Soha. 2016. “The Relationship of Attitude, Subjective Norm and Website Usability on Consumer Intention to Purchase Online: An Evidence of Malaysian Youth.” Procedia Economics and Finance 35: 493–502. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00061-7.
Hussein, Z. 2017. “Leading to Intention: The Role of Attitude in Relation to Technology Acceptance Model in E-Learning.” Procedia Computer Science 105: 159–164. doi: 10.1016/j.procs. 2017.01.196.
Ibrahim, R., N. S. Leng, R. C. M. Yusoff, G. N. Samy, I. S. Masrom, and Z. I. Rizman. 2017. “E-learning acceptance based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).” Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 9(4S): 871‒889.
Irani, T. 2000. “Prior Experience, Perceived Usefulness and the Web: Factors Influencing Agricultural Audiences, Adoption of Internet Communication Tools.” Journal of Applied Communications 84(2). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2151 (Accessed 18 February 2020).
Joo, Y. J., H. So, and N. H. Kim. 2018. “Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continued intention to use K-MOOCs.” Computers & Education 122: 260–272.
Karsten, R., A. Mitra, and D. Schmidt. 2012. “Computer Self-Efficacy: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Organisational and End User Computing 24(4): 54‒80.
Kilic, E., Ç. Güler, H. E. Çelik, and C. Tatli. 2015. “Learning with Interactive Whiteboards: Determining the Factors on Promoting Interactive Whiteboards to Students by Technology Acceptance Model.” Interactive Technology and Smart Education 12(4). ISSN 1741-5659.
Lee, Y. H., C. Hsiao, and S. H. Purnomo. 2014. “An empirical examination of individual and system characteristics on enhancing e-learning acceptance.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 30(5): 561‒579.
Lefievre, V. 2012. “Gender Differences in Acceptance by Students of Training Software for Office Tools.” Athens: ATINER’S Conference Paper Series, No: EDU2012-0138.
Liaw, S. 2008. “Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system.” Computers & Education 51(2): 864‒873.
Lin, F., S. S. Fofanah, and D. Liang. 2011. “Assessing citizen adoption of e-Government initiatives in Gambia: A validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success.” Government Information Quarterly 28(2): 271‒279. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.004.
Matarirano, O., N. R. Jere., H. S. Sibanda, and M. Panicker. 2021. “Antecedents of Blackboard Adoption by Lecturers at a South African Higher Education Institution – Extending GETAMEL.” iJET 16(1): 60‒79.
Mathieson, K. 1991. “Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with theory of planned behavior.” Infromation Systems Research 2(3): 173‒191.
Medyawati, H., M. Christiyanti, and M. Yunanto. 2011. “The Influence of Computer Self Efficacy, Computer Experience and Interface Design to Acceptance of Electronic Banking: Empirical Study of Bank Customers in Bekasi City.” International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning 1(4): 305‒310.
Mekoa, I. 2018. “African Renaissance ‒ Challenges facing higher education in South Africa: A change from apartheid education to democratic education.” African Renaissance 15(2): 227–246.
Motaghian, H., A. Hassanzadeh, and D. K. Moghadam. 2013. “Factors affecting university instructors’ adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran.” Computers & Education 61: 158–167.
Park, Y., H. Son, and C. Kim. 2012. “Investigating the determinants of construction professionals’ acceptance of web-based training: An extension of the technology acceptance model.” Automation in Construction 22: 377‒386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.016. (Accessed 12 November 2019).
Park, S. Y. 2009. “An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning.” Educational Technology & Society 12(3): 150–162.
Purnomo, S. H. and Y. Lee. 2013. “E-learning adoption in the banking workplace in Indonesia: An empirical study.” Information Development 29(2): 138‒153. doi: 10.1177/0266666912448258.
Ringle, C. M., S. Wende, and J. M. Becker. 2015. “SmartPLS 3.” Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com (Accessed 11 April 2020).
Saadé, R. G. and D. Kira. 2009. “Computer Anxiety in E-Learning: The Effect of Computer Self-Efficacy.” Journal of Information Technology Education 8: 177‒191.
Sánchez, R. A., A. D. Hueros, and M. G. Ordaz. 2013. “E-learning and the University of Huelva: A study of WebCT and the technological acceptance model.” Campus-Wide Information Systems 30(2): 135‒160. doi: 10.1108/10650741311306318.
Sarwar, A., M. Mufti, S. Akhtar, and A. Asma. 2018. “Examining factors affecting under graduate student’s behavioural intention towards e-learning systems through technology adoption model.” Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science 12(3): 148‒164.
Sarosa, S. 2019. “The role of brand reputation and perceived enjoyment in accepting compulsory device usage: Extending UTAUT.” Procedia Computer Science 161: 115‒122.
Sehoole, C. and H. de Wit. 2014. “The regionalisation, internationalisation, and globalisation of African Higher Education.” International Journal of Higher Education 14(1).
Taber, K. S. 2018. “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in Science Education.” Res Sci Educ 48:1273–1296.
Thakkar, S. R. and H. D. Joshi. 2018. “Impact of Technology Availability and Self-Efficacy on E-learning Usage.” International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology 6(4): 2956–2960.
Tripathi, S. 2018. “Moderating effects of age and experience on the factors influencing the actual usage of cloud computing.” Journal of International Technology and Information Management 27(2): 121‒158.
Uziak, J., M. T. Oladiran, E. Lorencowicz, and K. Becker. 2018. “Students’ and instructor’s perspective on the use of blackboard platform for delivering an engineering course.” Electronic Journal of e-Learning 16(1): 1–15.
Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.” Management Information Systems Quarterly 27(3): 425–478.
Walker, S., D. Prytherch, and J. Turner. 2013. “The pivotal role of staff user experiences in Moodle and the potential impact on student learning.” Second International Conference on E-Learning and E-Technologies in Education, 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICeLeTE.2013.6644372 (Accessed 12 November 2019).
Wu, B. and X. Chen. 2017. “Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model.” Computers in Human Behavior 67: 221–232.
Yeh, R. K. and T. C. Teng. 2012. “Extended conceptualisation of perceived usefulness: Empirical test in the context of information system use continuance.” Behaviour & Information Technology 31(5).
Zaharias, P. and C. Pappas. 2016. “Quality Management of Learning Management Systems: A User Experience Perspective.” Current Issues in Emerging eLearning 3(1): 60‒83. http://scholarworks. umb.edu/ciee/vol3/iss1/5 (Accessed 18 February 2020).
Zare, H. and S. Yazdanparast. 2013. “The causal Model of effective factors on Intention to use of information technology among payam noor and traditional university students.” Life Science Journal 10(2). http://www.lifesciencesite.com (Accessed 18 February 2020).
Copyright (c) 2021 Obert Matarirano, Manoj Panicker, Nobert Rangarirai Jere, Afika Maliwa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
