Accounting for the faculty differentials in the production of PhD graduates in a South African university

Keywords: PhD production, supervision, approaches and methods, graduated, differential


The ability of an institution to graduate students, also known as the throughput rate, is one of the most important means of an institution receiving a grant/ subsidy from the government. This article sought to interrogate the differentials in throughput rates of PhD graduates per faculty in a selected institution over a period of five years. Framed within the interpretive paradigm, a qualitative approach and a case study design were adopted. A non-probability purposive sample of 30 participants was selected the academic staff within the six faculties that make up the university under investigation. Data was collected through in-depth interviews and document analysis. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically and using the constant comparison technique. The major findings pointed to differentials in PhD production across faculties as emanating from variations in supervision approaches as reflected in the recruitment and selection of candidates, students’ composition, allocation of supervision load, preparation and orientation of candidates, mentoring of both students and junior staff members, as well as monitoring and evaluation of students’ progress. The findings also revealed challenges like lack of financial support for students, poor structural set-up of some faculties as well as “positive” discrimination in some faculties. These factors constrained the throughput rates in different faculties differently, resulting to a difference in PhD graduate production. It is concluded that there are some quality concerns resulting from the poor processes and procedures as well as the number of graduates from some staff members. It is recommended that the university harmonise its diverse PhD processes and procedures, and enlarge some faculties by creating distinct departments to provide requisite support and interventions to narrow the differentials and improve quality.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

M. Tanga, University of Fort Hare, East London

I am a Post-Doctoral Research Fellow and temporary lecturer in Faculty of Education, Faculty of Education, University of Fort Hare.

F. Megbowon, University of Fort Hare, East London

Postdoctoral Fellow and temporary lecturer, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities. University of Fort Hare.

V. Nkonki, University of Fort Hare, East London

Director of Teaching and Learning Centre, University of Fort Hare.

T. Rulashe, University of Fort Hare, East London

Lecturer, Faculty of Commerce and Management, University of Fort Hare


Academy of Science of South Africa. 2010. The PhD study. An evidence-based study on how to meet the demands of high-level skills in an emerging economy. Consensus Report. Pretoria. September.

ASSAf, see Academy of Science of South Africa.

Agency for Higher Education in the UK (QAA) 2015. Characteristics Statement: Doctoral Degree. London: QAA.

Albion, P. and R. Erwee. 2011. “Preparing for doctoral supervision at a distance: Lessons from experience.” In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 82‒89. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Alliyu, N. 2016. “Patriarchy, Women’s Triple Roles and Development in Southwest Nigeria.” International Journal of Arts and Humanities 5(4): 94‒110. DOI:

Andrade, M. 2006. “International students in English speaking universities: Adjustment factors.” Journal of Research in International Education 5(2): 131‒154. DO: 10.1177/147524096065589.

ASSAf see Academy of Science of South Africa.

Babbie, E. R. 2015. The practice of social research. 14th Edition. Canada: Cengage learning.

Berger, R. 2015. “Challenges and strategies in social work and social welfare PhD education: Helping candidates jump through the dissertation hoops.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 35(1‒2): 166‒178.

Bitzer, E. 2010. “Postgraduate research supervision: More at stake than research training.” Acta Academica Supplementum 1:23–56.

CHE see Council on Higher Education.

Cloete, N., J. M. Mouton, and C. Sheppard. 2015. The doctorate in South Africa: Discourse, data and policies. Cape Town: African Minds.

Council on Higher Education. 2018. Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework: Qualification Standard for Doctoral degrees. Pretoria: CHE.

Council on Higher Education. 2019. National Review of Doctoral Degrees offered by Higher Education Institutions in South Africa: Institutional Self-Evaluation Report Template. Pretoria: CHE.

Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative and quantitative and Mixed methods Approaches. 4th Edition. Thousand Oaks CA: SAGE.

De Cleyn, S., F. Gielen, and J. Coppens. 2014. “Activating researchers for entrepreneurship: Bridging the gap between research and transfer to society.” In University-Industry Interaction Conference, 1‒21.

De Lange, N., G. Pillay, and V. Chikoko. 2011. “Doctoral learning: A case for a cohort model of supervision and support.” South African Journal of Education 31(1).

Department of Science and Technology. 2008. Innovation Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy. Ten-Year Innovation Plan 2008–2018. Pretoria: DST.

DST see Department of Science and Technology.

Engebretson, K., K. Smith, D. McLaughlin, C. Siebold, G. Terret, and E. Ryan. 2008. “The changing reality of research education in Australia and implications for supervision: A review of the literature.” Teaching in Higher Education 13(1): 1–15.

Flick, U. 2018. “Triangulation” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 444‒461. 5th Edition. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Griffin, K. A. and R. J. Reddick. 2011. “Surveillance and sacrifice: Gender differences in the mentoring patterns of Black professors at predominantly White research universities.” American Educational Research Journal 48(5): 1032‒1057.

Kenney, M. and W. R. Goe. 2004. “The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford.” Research Policy 33(5): 691‒707.

Kumar, R. 2011. Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. 3rd Edition. New Delhi: Sage.

Lambie, G. W. and N. Vaccaro. 2011. “Doctoral counsellor education students’ levels of research self‐efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment, and interest in research.” Counsellor Education and Supervision 50(4): 243‒258.

Lessing, A. C. 2011. “The role of the supervisor in the supervisory process.” South African Journal of Higher Education 25(5): 921‒936.

Liechty, J. M., M. Liao, and C. P. Schull. 2009. “Facilitating dissertation completion and success among doctoral students in social work.” Journal of Social Work Education 45(3): 481‒497.

Linden, J., M. Ohlin, and E. M. Brodin. 2013. “Mentorship, supervision and learning experience in PhD education.” Studies in Higher Education 38(5): 639‒662.

Maxwell, T. W. and R. Smyth. 2011. “Higher degree research supervision: From practice toward theory.” Higher Education Research and Development 30(2): 219–231.

Mertens, A. and H. Röbken. 2013. “Does a doctoral degree pay off? An empirical analysis of rates of return of German doctorate holders.” Higher Education 66(2): 217‒231.

National Planning Commission (NPC). 2012. National Development Plan: Vision for 2030. Pretoria: NPC.

Rasmussen, E. and O. J. Borch. 2010. “University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities.” Research Policy 39(5): 602‒612.

Smith, A. 2010. The theory of moral sentiments. New York: Penguin.

Strydom, H. 2011. Sampling in the quantitative paradigm. Research at Grass Roots. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

Vijayakumar, J. K. and M. Vijayakumar. 2007. “Importance of doctoral theses and its access: A literature analysis.” The Grey Journal 3(2): 67‒75.

Wisker, G., G., Robinson, and M. Shacham. 2007. “Postgraduate research success: Communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities.” Innovation in Education and Teaching International 44(3): 301‒320.

How to Cite
Tanga, M., F. Megbowon, V. Nkonki, and T. Rulashe. 2021. “Accounting for the Faculty Differentials in the Production of PhD Graduates in a South African University”. South African Journal of Higher Education 35 (3), 220-38.
General Articles