Assessment in textbooks: Exploring cognitive demand in first-year accounting textbooks

Abstract

The South African higher education program expects to develop graduates with high cognitive skills.  This is endorsed further by the expectations of high cognitive attributes for entry level members from the Accounting professional bodies. Although learning is largely driven by assessment, relatively few studies have investigated assessments in Accounting textbooks. Furthermore, most used Bloom’s taxonomy as their sole analytical lens. Using a hybrid framework of Revised Bloom’s taxonomy and Leong’s levels of difficulty, this paper examines the cognitive demand of assessment tasks in selected level-one Financial Accounting textbooks used in South Africa and Kenya.  The findings reveal the dominance of the Apply-Task-Hybrid and the possibility of enabling higher cognitive attributes within lower levels of cognition. The article provides new insight for accounting academics who seek to enhance their pedagogical engagement, as well as textbook producers, curriculum developers and professional accounting bodies. It also offers the Layered Analytical Framework as an alternative approach to examining cognitive demand across diverse fields of study, but specifically within the discipline of Accounting.

Author Biographies

J.C. Ngwenya, University of KwaZulu-Natal

School of Education, Commerce Education Department

Lecturer

 

O.O. Arek-Bawa, University of KwaZulu-Natal

School of Education, Commerce Education Department

Lecturer

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, A. and A. Pollitt. 1999. Curriculum demands and question difficulty. Paper presented at the IAEA conference, Bled, Slovenia.

Agrawal, R., S. Gollapudi, A. Kannan and K. Kenthapadi. 2011b. Identifying enrichment candidates in textbooks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web.

Agrawal, R., S. Gollapudi, K. Kenthapadi, N. Srivastava and R. Velu. 2010. Enriching textbooks through data mining. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First ACM Symposium on Computing for Development.

Anderson, L. W., D. R. Krathwohl, P.W. Airasian, K.A. Cruikshank, R.E. Mayer, P.R. Pintrich,. . . M. C. Wittrock. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Arek-Bawa, O., and R. Dhunpath. 2017. Aessessment and cognitive Demand in Higher Education Accounting Textbooks. Alternations, 24(2): 140-166.

Arek-Bawa, O. 2018. Cognitive Demand of Assessment Activities in Level-One Financial Accounting Textbooks in Selected African Countries. (Doctoral dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban).

Bargate, K. 2012. Criteria Considered by Accounting Faculty When Selecting and Prescribing Textbooks -a South African Study. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(7): 114-122

Berger, M., L. Bowie and L. Nyaumwe. 2010. Taxonomy matters: Cognitive levels and types of mathematical activities in mathematics examinations. Pythagoras, 2010(71): 30-40.

Bezuidenhout, M. and H. Alt. 2011. 'Assessment drives learning': Do assessments promote high-level cognitive processing? South African Journal of Higher Education, 25(6): 1062-1076.

Biggs, J. 2003a. Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations, 2: 13-17.

Biggs, J. and C. Tang. 2007. Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does . Philadelphia, Pa.: Society for Research into Higher Education: Open University Press.

Chatterjee, B., and A. Brown. 2012. Instructional Note: Embedding English language in an accounting subject: A case of interactive interdisciplinary collaboration and learning. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 6(1): 44-50.

Chiang, W.C., T.D. Englebrecht, T.J. Phillips Jr, and Y. Wang. 2008. Readability of financial accounting principles textbooks. The Accounting Educators' Journal, 18: 47-80.

Coetzee, S. A., A. Schmulian, and L. Kotze. 2014. Communication Apprehension of South African Accounting Students: The Effect of Culture and Language. Issues in Accounting Education, 29(4): 505-525. doi:10.2308/iace-50850

Commission for University Education (CUE). 2014. Universities standards and guidelines, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.cue.or.ke/index.php/downloads/category/6 standards-and-guidelines

Davidson, R. A. 1996. Cognitive complexity and performance in professional accounting examinations. Accounting Education, 5(3): 219.

Davidson, R. A. and B. A. Baldwin. 2005. Cognitive skills objectives in intermediate accounting textbooks: Evidence from end-of-chapter material. Journal of Accounting Education, 23(2): 79-95.

Elo, S., M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, T. Pölkki, K. Utriainen and H. Kyngäs. 2014. Qualitative content analysis. Sage Open, 4(1): 2158244014522633.

Forman, J. and L. Damschroder. 2008. Qualitative content analysis. Empirical Research for Bioethics: A Primer. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Publishing, 39-62.

Greaney, V. 2006. Textbooks, respect for diversity, and social cohesion. PROMOTING, 47.

Gupta, S. and L. L. Marshall. 2010. Congruence between entry-level accountants’ required competencies and accounting textbooks. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(1): 1-12.

Henningsen, M. and M. K. Stein. 1997. Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 524-549.

Ho, H. 2008. Spiraling Effect of Prior Knowledge in Accounting Studies. International Journal of Learning, 15(4): 25-29.

Howieson, B. 2003. Accounting practice in the new millennium: Is accounting education ready to meet the challenge? The British Accounting Review, 35(2): 69-103.

International Accounting Education Standards Board (IAESB). 2010. Handbook of International Education Pronouncements. 2010 Edition: International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) New York, NY.

Jones, S. H. and R. A. Davidson. 2007. Measuring the Problem-Solving Abilities of Accounting and Other Business Students: A Comparison and Evaluation of Three Methods. Accounting education: An international journal, 16(1): 65-79. doi:10.1080/09639280600826034

Jones, S. H. and M. E. Wright. 2010. The Effects of a Hypertext Learning Aid and Cognitive Style on Performance in Advanced Financial Accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(1): 35-58. doi:10.2308/iace.2010.25.1.35

Jones, S. H. and M. E. Wright. 2012. Does Cognitive Style Affect Performance on Accounting Examination Questions? Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 9: 31.

Kasule, D. 2011. Textbook readability and ESL learners. Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa, 2(1): 63-76.

Le Hebel, F., P. Montpied, A. Tiberghien, and V. Fontanieu. 2017. Sources of difficulty in assessment: Example of PISA science items. International Journal of Science Education, 39(4): 468-487.

Leong, S. C. 2006. On varying the difficulty of test items. Paper presented at the32nd Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment in Singapore.

Mahadi, M. A. and M. Shahrill. 2014. Identifying The Issues From History Textbooks Research

Marsh, E. E. & M. D. White. 2006. Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1): 22-45.

Ngwenya, J. C. 2012. Formative Assessment in Accounting: Exploring Teachers' Understanding and Practices. (Doctoral dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.)

Okafor, R. G. 2012. Accounting Education in Nigerian Universities: Challenges and Prospects. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3(14): 205-212.

Opoku‐Amankwa, K. 2010. What happens to textbooks in the classroom? Pupils’ access to literacy in an urban primary school in Ghana. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(2): 159-172.

O’Reilly-Bargate, K. 2008. An investigation of prescribed managerial accounting and finance textbooks used by B. Com accounting students at some universities in South Africa. (Masters thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban).

Park, A. M. 2011. Comparing the Cognitive Demand of Traditional and Reform Algebra 1 Textbooks.

Schneider, M. C., K. L. Huff, K. L. Egan, M.L. Gaines & S. Ferrara. 2013. Relationships among Item Cognitive Complexity, Contextual Demands, and Item Difficulty: Implications for Achievement-Level Descriptors. Educational Assessment, 18(2): 99-121.

Schultz, K. T. 2009. Cognitive demand and technology use in high school mathematics teachers' selection and implementation of tasks. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).

Sheard, J., A. Carbone, D. Chinn, T. Clear, M. Corney, D. D'Souza, … and D. Teague. 2013. How difficult are exams? A framework for assessing the complexity of introductory programming exams. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference-Volume 136 (pp. 145-154). Australian Computer Society, Inc., Australia

Stokes, L. 2008. A preliminary study of learning objectives across the curriculum: An analysis of various accounting textbooks. Advances in Accounting Education, 9: 307-326.

Stokes, L., J. L. Rosetti and M. King, M. 2010. Form over substance: Learning objectives in the business core. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 3(11): 11-20.

The South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA). 2017. Competency framework detailed guideline for academic programme. Retrieved from http://www.saica.co.za/Portals/0/LearnersStudents/documents/Competency%20Framework%202019.pd

The South African Qualifications Authoriry (SAQA). 2012. Level of descritors for the South African National Qualification framework. Retrieved from http://www.saqa.org.za/docs/misc/2012/level_descriptors.pdf

Torfason, A. B. and A. L. M. Adorisio. 2015. Accounting As the Language of Business? Paper presented at the IPA Conference 2015.

Published
2020-04-02
How to Cite
Ngwenya, J.C., and O.O. Arek-Bawa. 2020. “Assessment in Textbooks: Exploring Cognitive Demand in First-Year Accounting Textbooks”. South African Journal of Higher Education 34 (1), 176-96. https://doi.org/10.20853/34-1-3370.
Section
General Articles