Sociocultural theory for academic literacy research involving argumentation in institutions of higher learning
Abstract
Researchers in the field of academic literacy, specifically those focused on the first-year level in universities, are often required to articulate the theoretical framework that informs their critical orientation. In this process, an indication of the researcher’s ontological view of the nature of academic literacy practices should also be declared. Ontologically, this study questions whether academic literacy constitutes a mechanistic technology or a socially emergent mode of arguing in higher education. This article reviews concepts and theories that warrant the second stance and a sociocultural paradigm of academic literacy research. A sociocultural explanatory framework incorporates human identities and cultures into analyses of the ways that humans employ language in universities. This framework accentuates the influences of social context and power relationships in the designation of acceptable modes of argumentation in the university. The results of the study indicate that theoretical discussions in academic literacy research are epistemic and ontological in nature. Theoretical frameworks are epistemic constructs as they reflect a researcher’s conceptual understanding of the field of academic literacy. Conceptual paradigms are also ontological constructs due to their exposure of the researcher’s understanding of the nature of academic literacy practices as an element of human existence. The study concludes by articulating a seven-point ontology that researchers can apply towards theoretically framing their own studies in the field of academic literacy and argumentation.
References
Adom, Dickson, Emad Hussain, and Joe Agyem. 2018. “Theoretical and conceptual framework of quality research.” International Journal of Scientific Research 7(1): 438‒441.
Alberto, P. A., L. Fredrick, M. Hughes, L. McIntosh, and D. Cihak. 2007. “Components of visual literacy: Teaching logos.” Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 22(4): 234‒243.
Amossy, R. 2009. “Argumentation in discourse: A socio-discursive approach to arguments.” Informal Logic 29(3): 252‒267.
Angu, P. 2019. “Understanding Voices from the Margins: Social Injustice and Agency in First-Year Students' Literacy Narratives.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 43(8): 1152‒1162.
Archer, Margaret. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge.
Arnold, L. 2019. “Accompanying as accomplices: Pedagogies for community engaged learning in sociocultural linguistics.” Language and Linguistics Compass 13(6): 1‒20.
Badger, R. and G. White. 2000. “A process genre approach to teaching writing.” ELT Journal 54(2): 153‒160.
Bangeni, B. and R. Kapp. 2020. “Shifting Language Attitudes in Linguistically Diverse Learning Environments in South Africa.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 28(4): 253‒269.
Blanton, L. L. 1994. “Discourse, artifacts, and the Ozarks: Understanding academic literacy.” Journal of Second Language Writing 3(1): 1‒16.
Bojuwoye, O. 2002. “Stressful experiences of first year students of selected universities in South Africa.” Counselling Psychology Quarterly 15(3): 277‒290.
Boldyrev, N. N. and O. G. Dubrovskaya. 2015. “Context of sociocultural knowledge in discourse construction.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 6(1 S2): 25‒30.
Brock-Utne, B. 2018. “Researching language and culture in Africa using an autoethnographic approach.” International Review of Education: Journal of Lifelong Learning 64(6): 713‒735.
Bucholtz, M. and K. Hall. 2005. “Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse Studies 7(4‒5): 585‒614.
Byram, M. 2012. “Language awareness and (critical) cultural awareness – relationships, comparisons and contrasts.” Language awareness 21(1‒2): 5‒13.
Carbone, P. M. and M. F. Orellana. 2010. “Developing academic identities: Persuasive writing as a tool to strengthen emergent academic identities.” Research in the Teaching of English 44(3): 292‒316.
Carstens, Adelia. 2009. “The Effectiveness of Genre-Based Approaches in Teaching Academic Writing: Subject-Specific Versus Cross-Disciplinary Emphases.” PhD dissertation, University of Pretoria.
Chaka, Chaka, Mirriam Lephalala, and Nandipha Ngesi. 2018. “English studies: Decolonisation, deparochialising knowledge and the null curriculum.” English Studies 35(2): 208‒229.
Chokwe, Jack. 2013. “Factors Impacting Academic Writing Skills of English Second Language Students.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 4: 377‒383.
Collin, R. and B. Street. 2014. “Ideology and Interaction: Debating Determinisms in Literacy Studies.” Reading Research Quarterly 49(3): 351‒359.
Cope, B. and M. Kalantzis. 2006. “From Literacy to ‘multiliteracies’: Learning to Mean in the New Communications Environment.” English Studies in Africa 49(1): 23‒45.
Ellery, K. 2017. “Conceptualising knowledge for access in the sciences: Academic development from a social realist perspective.” Higher Education 74(5): 915‒931.
Esteban-Guitart, M. and L. Moll. 2014. “Funds of identity: A new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach.” Culture and Psychology 20(1): 31‒48.
Fanon, F. 1963. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.
Ferretti, R. and S. Graham. 2019. “Argumentative writing: Theory, assessment, and instruction.” Reading and Writing 32: 1345‒1357.
Flowerdew, J. and S. H. Wang. 2015. “Identity in academic discourse.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35: 81‒99.
Freire, P. 2000. Pedagogy of the oppressed. 30th anniversary edition. New York: Continuum.
Gee, J. P. 2015. “Discourse, small d, big D.” The International Encyclopedia of Language Social Interaction: 1‒5.
Gee, J. P. 2008. Social Linguistics and Literacies. Milton Park: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. 2012. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. 4th edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Geisler, C. 1994. Academic Literacy and the Nature Of Expertise: Reading, Writing, and Knowing in Academic Philosophy. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Greenberg, J., S. Solomon, and T. Pyszczynski. 1997. “Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 29: 61‒139.
Henderson, J., K. McNeill, M. Gonzalez-Howard, K. Close, and Mat Evans. 2018. “Key challenges and future directions for educational research on scientific argumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55(1): 5‒18.
Hodges, A. 2015. “Sociocultural linguistics.” The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction: 1‒11.
Hyland, K. 2002. “Genre: Language, context, and literacy.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22(1): 113‒135.
Ioratim-Uba, G. 2019. “Datasets evidencing research on classroom practice in L2 disciplinary writing.” Data In Brief 25: 1‒11.
Irwin, D. and N. Liu. 2019. “Encoding, decoding, packing and unpacking via agnation: Reformulating general knowledge into disciplinary concepts for teaching English academic writing.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 42.
Kalantzis, M. 2006. “Elements of a science education.” Australian Educational Researcher 33(2): 15‒42.
Kalman, C., M. W. Aulls, S. Rohar, and J. Godley. 2008. “Students’ perceptions of reflective writing as a tool for exploring an introductory textbook.” Journal of College Science Teaching 37(4): 74‒81.
Kamberelis, G., V. R. Gillis and J. Leonard. 2014. “Disciplinary literacy, English learners, and STEM education.” Action in Teacher Education 36(3): 187‒191.
Kang, Sonia and Galen Bodenhausen. 2014. “Multiple identities in social perception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities.” Annual Review of Psychology 66(1): 547‒574.
Kist, W. 2004. “The New Literacies movement.” Independent School 63(4): 28‒36.
Klein, P. D. and L. C. Kirkpatrick. 2010. “Multimodal Literacies in Science: Currency, Coherence and Focus.” Research in Science Education 40(1): 87‒92.
Lea, M. and B. Street. 2006. The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications.” Theory into Practice 45(4): 227‒236.
Makalela, Leketi. 2018. “Community elders’ narrative accounts of ubuntu: Learning and teaching in African education.” International Review of Education 64: 823‒843.
Martiny, S. E., L. Froehlich, K. Deaux, and S. Y. Mok. 2017. “Defining ethnic, national, and dual identities: Structure, antecedents, and consequences of multiple social identities of Turkish‐origin high school students in Germany.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 27(5): 400‒410.
McWilliams, R. and Q. Allan. 2014. “Embedding academic literacy skills: Towards a best practice model.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 11(3): 1-20.
Newell, G. E., R. Beach, J. Smith, and J. Van Der Heide. 2011. “Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research.” Reading Research Quarterly 46(3): 273‒304.
Ochs, E. 1993. “Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(3): 287‒306.
Osei Mensah, R., Frimpong, A., Acquah, A. Babah, P., and J. Dontah. 2020. “Discourses on conceptual and theoretical frameworks in research: Meaning and implications for researchers.” Journal of African Interdisciplinary Studies 4(5): 53‒64.
Otu, M. and Z. Mkhize. 2018. “Understanding black student attrition in the context of transformation in South African higher education institutions.” Journal of African Foreign Affairs 5(1): 149‒171.
Parkinson, J. and A. Crouch. 2011. “Education, language, and identity amongst students at a South African university.” Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 10(2): 83‒98.
Pérez Báez, G. 2018. “Linguistic diversity, language vitality and the advancement of linguistics as a science.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 50(2): 180‒207.
Polo, Claire, Kristine Lund, Christian Plantin, and Gerald P Niccolai. 2016. “Group emotions: The social and cognitive functions of emotions in argumentation.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: An Official Publication of the International Society of the Learning Sciences 11(2): 123‒56.
Sapir, E. 1949. Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Personality. California: University of California Press.
Street, B. 1998. “Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach.” Studies in Higher Education 23(2): 157‒172.
Suransky, C. and J. C. van der Merwe. 2016. “Transcending apartheid in higher education: Transforming an institutional culture.” Race, Ethnicity and Education 19(3): 577‒597.
Teferra, K. 2017. “Curriculum responsiveness within the context of decolonisation in South African higher education.” Perspectives in Education 35(2): 196‒207.
Torres, T. 2018. “The acquisition of heritage languages.” Language 94(1): 223‒225.
Välimaa, J. 1998. “Culture and identity in higher education research.” Higher Education 36(2): 119‒138.
Van den Bos, K., P. M. Poortvliet, M. Maas, J. Miedema, and E. J. Van den Ham. 2005. “An enquiry concerning the principles of cultural norms and values: The impact of uncertainty and mortality salience on reactions to violations and bolstering of cultural worldviews.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41(2): 91‒113.
Vasquez, V. M., H. Janks, and B. Comber. 2019. “Critical literacy as a way of being and doing.” Language Arts 96(5): 300‒311.
Weiner, Melissa, F. 2016. “Colonized curriculum: Racializing discourses of Africa and Africans in Dutch primary school history textbooks.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 2(4): 450‒465.
Winarti, Eny. 2018. “Emancipatory education and the preparation of future teachers.” On the Horizon 26(2): 113‒121.
Wittek, L. and L. Habib. 2013. “Quality teaching and learning as practice within different disciplinary discourses.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 25(3): 275‒287.
Young, D. G. 2016. “The case for an integrated approach to transition programmes at South Africa’s higher education institutions.” Journal of Student Affairs in Africa 4(1): 15‒32.
Copyright (c) 2021 Oscar Oliver Eybers, Emma Paulet
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
