Gender justice paradox: Women in management positions in science and technological institutions in the central zone of Mexico

E. Sanchez-Cruz, A. Masinire, C. Gerónimo-Vázquez

Abstract


The past fifty years have witnessed intense local and international gender equity activism. However, the gender landscape has not transformed significantly to reflect a gender equal and just space. Men continue to occupy top influential political and economic positions. While current theoretical work on gender has developed incisive analytic tools which problematise gender essentialism, normative gender stereotypes persist and continue to dominate the institutional practices in many management positions in technological institutions in Mexico. The purpose of this study was to interrogate gender representation in key management positions in the state technological institutes of the central zone of Mexico. We analysed employment and recruitment documents available on the national database and compared the statistics on gender lines to establish the percentage of male and female managers in the science and technological institutes. The results showed that a greater proportion of management positions were occupied by men who were underqualified academically and professionally. Though there were few women in these posts, those women had appropriate and relevant qualifications. We conclude that gender difference may be used to explain the gender biased employment practices in key leadership positions in the technological institutes in Mexico. We also suggest possible research, policy and practical implications beyond the borders of Mexico.


Keywords


gender equity, public management in education, higher education, science and technology, Mexico

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angulo, L. and M. Galván. 2018. Avances en el cumplimiento de la esfera educación y capacitación de la mujer, a más de 20 años de la Plataforma de Acción de Beijing. Diálogos sobre educación Año 9(16): 1‒12. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/dsetaie/v9n16/2007-2171-dsetaie-9-16-00006.pdf (Accessed 18 September 2018).

Blickenstaff, J. C. 2005. Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter. Gender and Education 17(4): 369‒386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09542050500145072 (Accessed 10 September 2019).

CNDH. 2018. Estudio sobre la igualdad entre mujeres y hombres en materia de puestos y salarios en la administración pública federal (APF) 2017. Programa de asuntos de la mujer y de igualdad entre mujeres y hombres, México. https://www.cndh.org.mx/sites/all/doc/Informes/Especiales/ Estudio-igualdad-20180206.pdf (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Connell, R. W. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Connell, R. W. 2000. The men and the boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Connell, R. W. 2005. Change among the gatekeepers: Men, masculinities, and gender equality in the global arena. Signs 30(3): 1801‒1825.

Connell, R. W. 2009. Gender in the world perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF). 2014. Decreto que crea el Tecnológico Nacional de Mexico. México. http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_to_doc.php?codnota=5353458 (Accessed 18 September 2018).

Dines, E .1993. Women in higher education management. Paris: Commonwealth Secretariat, UNESCO.

Ducklin, A. and J. Ozga. 2007. Gender and management in further education in Scotland: An agenda for research. Gender and Education 19(5): 627‒646. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250701535691 (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. 2013. El gasto etiquetado para las mujeres y la igualdad de género (GEMIG) en México: Un avance para garantizar la autonomía de las mujeres. Observatorio de igualdad de género de América Latina y el Caribe, México. https://oig.cepal.org/sites/default/files/el_gasto_etiquetado_para_las_mujeres_en_mexico_ esp.pdf (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Gaceta Parlamentaria, Número 4242-IV. 2015. http://gaceta.diputados.gob.mx/Black/Gaceta/ Anteriores/62/2015/mar/20150326-IV/Iniciativa-7.html (Accessed 10 September 2019).

González, A. 2015. El techo de cristal. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis, Universidad de Oviedo, España. http://digibuo.uniovi.es/dspace/bitstream/10651/33742/3/TFM_GonzalezMartinez%2C%20Ana.pdf (Accessed 10 September 2019).

INEGI. 2017. Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo. Tercer trimestre de 2017. Indicadores de género para población de 15 años y más, México. http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/ proyectos/enchogares/regulares/enoe/ (Accessed 13 September 2018).

INEGI/INMUJERES. 2016. Mujeres y hombres en México, 2016. Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres, México. http://cedoc.inmujeres.gob.mx/documentos_download/MHM_2016.pdf (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Kayi, N. 2013. The progression of women to senior management positions at a South African University in the Western Cape. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, South Africa

Kele, T. and J. Pietersen. 2015. Women leaders in a South African higher education institution: narrations of their leadership operations. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 11‒16.

Kelley, M. S and K. K. Bryan. 2018. Gendered perceptions of typical engineers across specialties for engineering majors. Gender and Education 30(1): 22‒44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253. 2016.1262007 (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Lamas, M. 1996. La perspectiva de género. Consejo Nacional de Población, 3ª edición, México. https://www.dgespe.sep.gob.mx/public/genero/PDF/LECTURAS/S_01_13_La%20perspectiva%20de%20g%C3%A9nero.pdf (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Lorber, J. 2010. Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lynch, I. and T. Nowosenetz. 2009. An exploratory study of students’ constructions of gender in science, engineering and technology. Gender and Education 21(5): 567‒581. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09540250802555424 (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Moodly, A. and N. M. Toni. 2017. Accessing higher education leadership: Towards a framework for women’s professional development. South African Journal of Higher Education 31(3): 138‒153.

Morojele, P. 2011. What does it mean to be a boy? Implications for boys and girls schooling experiences in Lesotho rural schools. Gender and Education 23(1): 1‒17.

OECD. 2017a. Building an inclusive Mexico. Policies and good governance for gender equality. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/building-an-inclusive-mexico_9789264265493-en (Accessed 10 September 2019).

OECD. 2017b. La lucha por la igualdad de género. Una batalla cuesta arriba. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/Mexico/Gender2017-MEX-es.pdf (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Ordorika. I. 2015. Equidad de Género en la Educación Superior. Revista de Educación Superior 44(174), abril/junio 2015. https://www.ses.unam.mx/integrantes/uploadfile/iordorika/Ordorika2015_ EquidadDeGeneroEnLaEducSup.pdf (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2013‒2018. https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup. php?codigo= 5299465 (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Programa para la cohesión social en América Latina. 2017. Guía para educación superior. La ética profesional y tu compromiso ciudadano. sii. http://www.sii.cl/destacados/sii_educa/contenidos/ docentes/jovenes/27-OP-201405295056.pdf (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Programa Regional de Desarrollo del Centro 2014‒2018. http://www.senado.gob.mx/ comisiones/ desarrollo_regional/docs/ProgRegDesarr_Centro2014_2018.pdf (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Programa Sectorial de Educación. 2013‒2018. Instituciones de educación superior. https://www.ses.sep. gob.mx/instituciones.html. (Accessed 30 August 2018).

Ramohai, J. 2019. Women in senior management positions at South African universities: Their movement in, out and across universities. Gender in Management: An International Journal 34(3): 217‒232.

Sampieri, R., C. Collado and P. Lucio. 2014. Metodologia de la investación. Editorial. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Subirats, M. 1998. La educación de las mujeres: De la marginalidad a la coeducación. Propuestas para una metodología de cambio educativo. Santiago de Chile, Chile: Serie mujer y desarrollo, CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/5864/S9800068_es.pdf (Accessed 18 September 2018).

Subsecretaria de Educación Superior. 2018. https://educacionsuperior.sep.gob.mx/ (Accessed 11 September 2018).

TECNM. 2018a. Directorio telefónico de los IT’s descentralizados. Tecnológico Nacional de México. http://sitio.tecnm.mx/reportes/directorio_descentralizados.php?str=6492d38d732122c58b44e3fdc3e9e9f3 (Accessed 10 September 2019).

TECNM. 2018b. Institutos Tecnológicos. Tecnológico Nacional de México. http://www.tecnm.mx/ informacion/institutos-tecnologicos-de-mexico (Accessed 10 September 2019).

TECNM. 2018c. Política de equidad de género. Tecnológico Nacional de México. http://www.tecnm. mx/informacion/politica-de-equidad-de-genero (Accessed 10 September 2019).

UNDP. 2017. La democracia paritaria en México: Avances y desafíos. Centro Regional del Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. http://www.mx.undp.org/content/mexico/es/home/ library/democratic_governance/la-democracia-paritaria-en-mexico--avances-y-desafios.html (Accessed 10 September 2018).

UNESCO. 2018. Informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo 2018. Equipo del informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/ 002619/261945s.pdf (Accessed 10 September, 2018).

UN-Women. 2015. Los derechos políticos de las mujeres y cómo defenderlos. Cuaderno de trabajo. Entidad de las Naciones Unidas para la igualdad de Género y el Empoderamiento de las Mujeres, México. http://www2.unwomen.org/-/media/field%20office%20mexico/documentos/publica ciones/2015/01/derechos%20poli%C3%ACticos%20de%20las%20mujeres.pdf?la=es&vs=4038 (Accessed 10 September 2019).

Vega, L., G. Borunda, A. Bernal, G. Carmona, M. Cisneros, and F. Córdova. 2012. Modelo educativo para el siglo XXI. Formación y Desarrollo de Competencias Profesionales. Dirección General de Educación Superior Tecnológica. México. http://www.tecnm.mx/modeloeducativo/ modeloeducativo.pdf (Accessed 10 September 2018).

Volman, M., E. Van Eck and G. Tev Dam. 1995. Girls in science and technology: The development of a discourse. Gender and Education 7(3): 283‒292.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/34-3-3599

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


eISSN: 1753-5913

Copyright © 2016 South African Journal of Higher Education

Hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2016.

Creative Commons License -CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Disclaimer:
This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.