The invisible support networks of doctoral candidates: What acknowledgement sections of doctoral theses reveal
Although some argue that acknowledgement sections should not form part of doctoral theses, others welcome such sections and are of the opinion that they reflect original and personal contributions, constituting a neglected genre. Previous research on acknowledgement texts have focused more on their linguistic characteristics as related to the academic writing of theses. The present study, however, inquired into acknowledgement sections from a social support perspective. The aim of the study was to bring to light the dimension of the social milieu and its importance in supporting doctoral students in successfully achieving their doctorate. More specifically, the study sought to investigate the role of “significant others” in the academic success of doctoral students as reflected in the genres of acknowledgement in doctoral theses by analysing such texts from 30 completed doctoral theses in South Africa and Israel. Follow-up interviews with graduates assisted to probe deeper into the meaning of the texts. Although limited in nature, the study found that, based on who doctoral graduates acknowledge, several role-players and supporters seem to contribute to doctoral success. This includes family members, friends, colleagues, study supervisors, funders and university administrators. What also became clear was that doctoral candidates rely mainly on psycho-social forms of support and that particular kinds of such support are crucial at different stages of the doctoral journey. Acknowledgement studies confirm the doctoral research process as an activity stream that integrates the personal, the interpersonal and the institutional to reveal the mostly hidden, but very important, influences on the doctorate.
Azad, A. and F. Kohun. 2007. “Dealing with social isolation to minimize doctoral attrition – A four-stage framework.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 2: 33‒49.
Bazerman, C. 1988. Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Ben Ari, E. 1995. “On acknowledgement in ethnographies.” In Representation in Ethnography, ed. J. Van Maanen, 130–164. London: Sage.
Boud, D. and A. Lee. 2005. “Peer learning as pedagogic discourse for research education.” Studies in Higher Education 30(5): 501–516.
Caesar, T. 1992. “On acknowledgements.” New Orleans Review 19(1): 85‒94.
Cheng, S. W. 2012. “A contrastive study of master thesis acknowledgements by Taiwanese and North American students.” Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 2(1): 8‒17.
Cronin, B. 1995. The scholar’s courtesy: The role of acknowledgements in the primary communication process. London: Taylor Graham.
Cronin, B., G. McKenzie, and L. Rubio. 1993. The norms of acknowledgement in four humanities and social sciences disciplines. Journal of Documentation 49(1): 29‒43.
Dirks, S. E. and S. Metts. 2010. “An investigation of the support process: Decision enactment, and outcome.” Communication Studies 61: 391‒411.
Giannoni, D. S. 2002. “Worlds of gratitude: A contrastive study of acknowledgment texts in English and Italian research articles.” Applied Linguistics 23(1): 1‒31.
Hopwood, N., P. Alexander, S. Harris-Huemmert, L. McAlpine and S. Wagstaff. 2011. “The hidden realities of life as a doctoral student.” In International perspectives on doctoral education: A resource for supervisors and students, ed. V. Mallan and A. Lee. Serdang, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
Hunter, K. H. and K. Devine. 2016. “Doctoral students’ emotional exhaustion and intentions to leave academia.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 11: 35‒61.
Hyland, K. 2003. “Dissertation Acknowledgements: The Anatomy of a Cinderella Genre.” Written Communication 20(3): 242‒268.
Hyland, K. 2004a. “Graduates’ gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements.” English for Specific Purposes 23: 303‒324.
Hyland, K. 2004b. “I would like to thank my supervisor.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14(2): 259‒275.
Hyland, K. 2011. “The presentation of self in scholarly life: Identity and marginalization in academic homepages.” English for Specific Purposes 30(4): 286‒297.
Ivankova, N. V. and S. L. Stick. 2007. “Students’ Persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study.” Higher Education 48(1): 93‒135.
Jairam, D. and D. H. Kahl. 2012. “Navigating the doctoral experience: The role of social support in successful degree completion.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 7: 311–328.
Lakey B., O. Edward, K. L. Hain, and M. Van Vleet. 2010. “Enacted support’s links to negative affect and perceived support are more consistent with theory when social influences are isolated from trait influences.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36: 132–142.
Lee, C. J. 2009. “The experience of nurse faculty members enrolled in doctoral study.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 4: 59–74.
Lizzio, A. and K. Wilson. 2006. “Enhancing the effectiveness of self-managed learning groups: Understanding students’ choices and concerns.” Studies in Higher Education 31(6): 689–703.
Lovitts, B. E. 2001. Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
McAlpine, L. and M. McKinnon. 2013. “Supervision – The most variable of variables: Student perspectives.” Studies in Continuing Education 35(3): 265–280.
Moos, R. H. and R. E. Mitchell. 1982. Social network resources and adaptation: A conceptual framework. In Basic processes in helping relationships, ed. T. A. Wills, 213‒232. New York: Academic Press.
Postgraduate Supervision Conference. 2019. The global scholar: Implications for postgraduate studies and supervision. Spier Wine Estate, Stellenbosch. 26–29 March.
Pyhältö, K., A. Toom, J. Stubb, and K. Lonka. 2012. Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of experienced problems and well-being of doctoral students. International Scholarly Research Network (Education), 1‒12.
Rad, G. S., L. A. Bakht, A. Feizi, and S. Mohebi. 2013. “Importance of social support in diabetes care.” Journal of Education and Health Promotion 30(2). doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.120864.
Schmidt, M. and E. Hansson. 2018. “Doctoral students’ well-being: A literature review.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 13(1): 1508171. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1508171.
Sweitzer, V. 2009. “Towards a theory of doctoral students’ professional identity development: A developmental network approach.” The Journal of Higher Education 80(1): 1‒33.
Tenenbaum, H. R., F. J. Crosby, and M. D. Gliner. 2001. “Mentoring relationships in graduate school.” Journal of Vocational Behaviour 59: 326‒341.
Thoits, P. A. 2011. “Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 52(2): 145‒161.
Turner, R. J. 1981. “Social support as a contingency in psychological well-being.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 22: 357‒367.
Wao, H. and A. J. Onwuegbuzie. 2011. “A mixed research investigation of factors related to time to the doctorate in education.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 6: 115‒134.
Wisker, W., G. Robinson, and S. E. Bengtsen. 2017. “Penumbra: Doctoral support as drama: From the ‘lightside’ to the ‘darkside’. From front of house to trapdoors and recesses.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54(6): 527‒538.
Wulff, D. H. and A. E. Austin. (Eds.). 2004. Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wulff, D. H., A. E. Austin, J. D. Nyquist, and J. Sprague. 2004. “The development of graduate students as teaching scholars: A four-year longitudinal study.” In Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty, ed. D. H. Wulff and A. E. Austin, 67‒83. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zhao, C-M., C. M. Golde, and A. C. McCormick. 2007. “More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behavior affect doctoral student satisfaction.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 31(3): 263‒281.
Copyright (c) 2021 Eli Bitzer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authorsÂ and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.Â
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0