Improving distance learning mathematics modules in South Africa: A learning design perspective

L.E. Greyling, B. Huntley, K. Reedy, J. Rogaten

Abstract


In order to deliver high-quality learning and teaching, the Open University (OU) has adopted an approach to developing its curriculum called OU Learning Design, which supports a consistent and structured design, specification and review process. It provides a simple set of tools and resources to assist teams in choosing and integrating an effective range of media and technologies, defining their pedagogic approach, and sharing good practice across the institution (Subotzky and Prinsloo 2011).

The objective of this study was to apply OU Learning Design tools in the context of the largest distance education university in Africa (Unisa) to identify areas that could be changed in order to improve student outcomes and retention. Two Unisa first-level mathematics modules were evaluated and mapped using OU Learning Design approaches and tools to identify areas for improvement. Qualitative and quantitative data on students’ educational experience in these modules and longitudinal academic progress data were used to better understand the challenges students are facing on those courses.

The process uncovered areas where improvements need to be made and among the core recommendations were improvement of workload distribution across both modules, the timing of the examination period, and a greater variety of learning activities. These reflections will be used to inform the next “Plan” stage of the Action Research spiral.


Keywords


distance education; learning design; grades; dropout; mathematics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Case, A. 2009. The action reflection cycle, adapted from CELT (2008). https://www.flickr.com/ photos/caseorganic/4069528636 (Accessed 2 March 2018).

Conole, G. 2013. Designing for learning in an open world. London: Springer.

Cross, S., R. Galley, A. Brasher and M. Weller. 2012. Final Project Report of the OULDI-JISC Project: Challenge and change in curriculum design process, communities, visualisation and practice. Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University. http://www.open.ac.uk/ blogs/OULDI/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/OULDI_Final_Report_Final.pdf (Accessed 7 August 2018).

Galley, R. 2015. Introducing methods for enhancing curriculum innovation and quality. Institute of Educational Technology. http://www.open.ac.uk/iet/learning-design/sites/www.open.ac.uk.iet. learning-design/files/files/ecms/web-content/Learning-Design-at-the-Open-University.pdf (Internal site ‒ accessed 26 June 2017).

Healey, M., A. Flint and K. Harrington. 2014. Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Academy, UK. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/engagement_through_partnership.pdf (Accessed 28 February 2018).

Macfarlane, B. and M. Tomlinson. 2017. Critiques of student engagement. Higher Education Policy 30: 5–21. DOI: 10.1057/s41307-016-0027-3 (Accessed 13 January 2019).

Mittelmeier, J., D. Long, F. M. Cin, K. Reedy, A. Gunter, P. Raghuram and B. Rienties. 2018. Learning design in diverse institutional and cultural contexts: Suggestions from a participatory workshop with higher education professionals in Africa. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1486185 (Accessed 13 January 2019).

Newswander, L. and M. Borrego. 2009. Engagement in two interdisciplinary graduate programs. Higher Education 58(4): 551–562, cited by B. Macfarlane and M. Tomlinson. (2017) In Higher Education Policy 30: 1–4. doi:10.1057/s41307-016-0026-4 (Accessed 13 January 2019).

Nguyen, Q., B. Rienties, L. Toetenel, R. Ferguson and D. Whitelock. 2017. Examining the designs of computer-based assessment and its impact on student engagement, satisfaction, and pass rates. Computers in Human Behavior, 703‒714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.028 (Accessed 13 January 2019).

Nguyen, Q., B. Rienties and L. Toetenel. 2017. Unravelling the dynamics of instructional practice: A longitudinal study on learning design and VLE activities. In Seventh International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, ed.

Marek Hatala, Alyssa Wis, Phil Winne, Grace Lynch, Xavier Ochoa, Inge Molenaar, Shane Dawson, Shady Shehata, Jennifer Pei-Ling Tan, 168–177. ACM, New York.

Norton, L. 2009. Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. London: Routledge.

Open University UK. 2017. Ensuring consistent student workload on a module: Curriculum management guide. (Internal document).

Open University Centre for Outcomes Based Learning. 2005. Action research: A guide for associate lecturers. Open University internal document (Accessed 2 March 2018).

Rienties, B., L. Toetenel and A. Bryan. 2015. Scaling up learning design: Impact of learning design activities on LMS behavior and performance. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2015, 315‒319. ACM, New York, NY, USA.

Rienties, B. and L. Toetenel. 2016. The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior 60: 333–341. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563216301327 (Accessed 25 March 2018).

Rienties, B., Q. Nguyen, W. Holmes and K. Reedy. 2017. A review of ten years of implementation and research in aligning learning design with learning analytics at the Open University UK. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal 2017 33: 134–154. http://www.mifav.uniroma2.it/ inevent/events/idea2010/doc/33_7.pdf (Accessed 7 August 2018).

Rienties, B., T. Lewis, R. McFarlane, Q. Nguyen and L. Toetenel. 2018. Analytics in online and offline language learning environments: The role of learning design to understand student online engagement. Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 31(3): 273‒293.

Subotzky, G. and P. Prinsloo. 2011. Turning the tide: A socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa. Journal of Distance Education 32(2): 177–193. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/ 01587919.2011.584846 (Accessed 26 June 2017).

Toetenel, L. and B. Rienties. 2016a. Analysing 157 learning designs using learning analytic approaches as a means to evaluate the impact of pedagogical decision making. British Journal of Educational Technology 47(5): 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12423 (Accessed 26 June 2017).

Toetenel, L. and B. Rienties. 2016b. Learning design – creative design to visualise learning activities. Open Learning 31(3): 233–244.

Whitelock, D. M. Thorpe and R. Galley. 2015. Student workload: A case study of its significance, evaluation and management at the Open University. Distance Education 36(2): 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1055059 (Accessed 25 March 2018).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/34-3-3358

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


eISSN: 1753-5913

Copyright © 2016 South African Journal of Higher Education

Hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2016.

Creative Commons License -CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Disclaimer:
This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.