Postgraduate writing groups as spaces of agency development

  • D.O. Oluwole Centre For Postgraduate Studies, Rhodes University, Grahamstown
  • O. Achadu Centre For Postgraduate Studies, Rhodes University, Grahamstown
  • F. Asfour Centre For Postgraduate Studies, Rhodes University, Grahamstown
  • G. Chakona Centre For Postgraduate Studies, Rhodes University, Grahamstown
  • P. Mason Centre For Postgraduate Studies, Rhodes University, Grahamstown
  • P. Mataruse Centre For Postgraduate Studies, Rhodes University, Grahamstown
  • S. McKenna Centre For Postgraduate Studies, Rhodes University, Grahamstown



Academic writing is a peculiar phenomenon – it varies greatly from discipline to discipline and its requirements are rarely made overt. Taking on the writing practices of the academy has implications for identity and it is thus unsurprising that it is seen to be a risky endeavour. This article analyses the experiences of postgraduate scholars who have participated in writing groups that meet weekly to read each other’s work and provide supportive critique. Thirty-two people provided detailed, anonymous evaluations of their writing groups and these were analysed using a discourse analysis. Three main findings are discussed here. Firstly, writing circles allowed for academic writing development to be engaged with as a social practice, where the disciplinary norms could be made more explicit through peer deliberation, and where they could also be challenged. Secondly, the lack of hierarchical power in the writing groups was key to making safe spaces for agency development, and also for providing positive peer pressure whereby participants were spurred on to work on their writing. Thirdly, the fact that the groups were interdisciplinary, within cognate disciplinary families, provided an interesting challenge in that the students had to consider what these non-specialist readers would or would not understand. This process assisted students in clarifying their writing. Participants’ evaluation of the writing groups revealed an overall sense that these contributed to postgraduate student wellbeing and were places of significant agential development.


Download data is not yet available.



Aitchison, C. 2003. Thesis writing circles, Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2): 97–115.

Aitchison, C. and A. Lee. 2006. Research Writing: Problems and Pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education. 11(3): 265-278.

Aitchison, C. and A. Lee. 2006. Research Writing: problems and pedagogies, Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3): 265–278.

Archer, M. 1995. Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. New York. Cambridge University Press.

Archer, M. 2000. Being Human: The problem of agency. New York. Cambridge University Press.

Boughey, C. and McKenna, S. 2016. ‘Academic Literacy and the decontextualized learner’ Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 1-9.

Chihota, M. C. 2007. ‘The games people play’: taking on postgraduate identities in the context of writer circles, Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(1): 131–136.

Choudry, A. A. 2015. Learning Activism: The Intellectual Life of Contemporary Social Movements. Ontario: University of Toronto Press.

Fairclough, N. 2005. Peripheral Vision: Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism. Organization Studies, 26, 6, pp. 915-939.

Fairclough, N., Jessop, B. & Sayer, A. 2002. Critical Realism and Semiosis. Journal of Critical Realism, 5, 1, pp. 2-10. Porpora

Harward, D. W. 2016 (Ed.). Well-Being and Higher Education: A Strategy for Change and the Realization of Education's Greater Purposes. Washington, DC: Bridging Theory to Practice.

Kress, G. 1989. Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Larcombe, W., McCosker, A., & O’Loughlin, K. 2007. Supporting education PhD and DEd students to become confident academic writers: An evaluation of thesis writers’ circles. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 4, 54–63. Retrieved from

Lea, M., & Street, B. 2006. The ‘Academic literacies’ model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11

Li, L., & Vandermensbrugghe, J. 2011. Supporting the thesis writing process of international research students through an ongoing writing group. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48, 195–205. doi:10.1080/14703297.2011.564014

Lillis, T., & Scott, M. 2007. Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5–32. doi:10.1558/japl.v4i1.5

Lu, M. 1998. From Silence to Words: Writing as Struggle. Negotiating Academic Literacies: Teaching and Learning Across Languages and Cultures. Ed. Vivian Zamel

Maton, K. (2014) Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.

Porpora, D. Y. 2013. ‘Morphogenesis and social change’. In Archer M. S. (ed.), Social Morphogenesis. Dordrecht. Springer.

Smit, R. 2012. Towards a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: problematising deficit thinking. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(3): 369–380

Tang, R. 2012. The issues and Challenges facing Academic Writers from ESL/EFL Contexts: An Overview. Ed. Ramona Tang. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Thesen, I. 2013. Risk in postgraduate writing: voice, discourse, and edgework, CriSTaL, 1(1): 103–122

Wilmot, K. & McKenna, S. 2018. Writing groups as transformative spaces Higher Education Research and Development

Wilmot, K. 2015. Supporting academic writing practices in postgraduate studies: A theoretical overview. Online at:

Wilmot, K. and Lotz-Sisitka, H. 2016. Supporting academic writing practices in postgraduate studies. Online at:

How to Cite
Oluwole, D.O., O. Achadu, F. Asfour, G. Chakona, P. Mason, P. Mataruse, and S. McKenna. 2018. “Postgraduate Writing Groups As Spaces of Agency Development”. South African Journal of Higher Education 32 (6), 370-81.