Improving student assessment feedback in an introductory accounting course through two-stage collaborative assessment
Abstract
Student feedback is an important part of the formative assessment process. Previous research shows that there is room for improvement in student feedback on accounting education. Various benefits, especially those associated with the development of certain pervasive skills through cooperative learning, have been established through research. The two-stage group examination offers students the opportunity to become active participants in the feedback process, while harvesting the benefits of teamwork. This study involving 24 students enrolled for an introductory accounting course evaluated the efficacy of the two-stage examination as an intervention to improve feedback.
Students perceived that examination retakes in a team environment were helpful to establish where they made mistakes and showed them how they could improve their future performance. They could further establish how they performed compared to their peers. The examination retakes also helped to improve their understanding of the work and how they could improve their learning.
The intervention was well received by students despite reports of free riding. This study adds to the limited body of research on two-stage exams in accounting education.
References
Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(5), 593–604.
Bay, D., & Pacharn, P. (2017). Impact of group exams in a graduate intermediate accounting class. Accounting Education, 26(4), 316-334
Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75.
Blayney, P., & Freeman, M. (2008). Individualised interactive formative assessments to promote independent learning. Journal of Accounting Education, 26(3), 155–165.
Clinton, B. D., & Kohlmeyer III, J. M. (2005). The effects of group quizzes on performance and motivation to learn : Two experiments in cooperative learning. Journal of Accounting Education, 23, 96–116.
Cortright, R. N., Collins, H. L., Rodenbaugh, D. W., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2003). Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing. Advances in Physiology Education, 27(3), 102–108.
Cottell, P. G., & Millis, B. J. (1992). Cooperative learning in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 10(1), 95–111.
Curtis, S. M. (2011). Formative assessment in accounting education and some initial evidence on its use for instructional sequencing. Journal of Accounting Education, 29(4), 191–211.
De Lange, P., & Watty, K. (2011). Accounting education at a crossroad in 2010 and challenges facing accounting education in Australia. Accounting Education, 20(6), 625–630.
Ellery, K. (2008). Assessment for learning : A case study using feedback effectively in an essay-style test. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 421–429.
Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120.
Fluckiger, J., Tixier, Y., Pasco, R., & Danielson, K. (2010). Formative feedback: Involving students as partners in assessment to enhance learning. College Teaching, (58), 136–140.
Gabbin, A. L., & Wood, L. I. (2008). An experimental study of accounting majors’ academic achievement using cooperative learning groups. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(3), 391–404.
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.
Gilbert, L., Whitelock, D., & Gale, V. (2011). Synthesis report on assessment and feedback with technology enhancement. University of Southamton
Guthrie, J., Evans, E., & Burritt, R. (2014). Australian accounting academics: Challenges and possibilities. Meditari Accountancy Research, 22(1), 20–37.
Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (2014). The global accounting academic: What counts! Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(1), 2–14.
Hahn, E. D., & Ang, S. H. (2017). From the editors: New directions in the reporting of statistical results in the Journal of World Business. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 125–126.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2017). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hesketh, J. (2011). Accounting academics’ multiple challenges: Issues-driven learning offers a way forward. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 25(1), 1–34.
Hite, P. A. (1996). An experimental study of the effectiveness of group exams in an individual income tax class. Issues in Accounting Education, 11(1), 61–75.
Hounsell, D., Mccune, V., Hounsell, J., & Litjens, J. (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(March), 55–67.
Hwang, N. R., Lui, G., Yew, M., & Wu, J. (2005). An empirical test of cooperative learning in a passive learning environment. Issues in Accounting Education, 20 (May), 151–166.
Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Joyce, W. B. (1999). On the free-rider problem in co-operative learning. Journal of Education for Business, 74(5),130–153.
Keevy, M. (2015). Using collaborative learning exercises to transfer pervasive skills: Some South African evidence. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 8(2), 456–473.
Lubbe, I. (2014). Educating professionals. Meditari Accountancy Research, 22(1), 107–127.
Marriott, P., & Teoh, L. K. (2012). Using screencasts to enhance assessment feedback: Students’ perceptions and preferences. Accounting Education, 21(6), 583–598.
McCarthy, J. (2015). Evaluating written, audio and video feedback in higher education summative assessment tasks. Issues in Educational Research, 25(2), 153-169.
Mungal, A., & Cloete, M. (2017). Preparing underprepared students for higher education and beyond: The development and implementation of an integrated project. Accounting Education, 25(3), 203–222.
Opdecam, E., & Everaert, P. (2012). Improving student satisfaction in a first-year undergraduate accounting course by team learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(1), 53–82.
Opdecam, E., Everaert, P., Van Keer, H., & Buysschaert, F. (2012). The effect of team learning on student profile and student performance in accounting education. Working Paper: Universiteit Gent.
Perera, L., Nguyen, H. O. A., & Watty, K. I. M. (2014). Formative feedback through summative tutorial-based assessments: The relationship to student performance. Accounting Education, 23(5), 424–442.
Pitt, E., & Norton, L. (2017). “Now that’s the feedback I want!” Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 499–516.
Reinig, B. A., Horowitz, I., & Whittenburg, G. (2014). Determinants of student attitudes toward team exams. Accounting Education, 23(3), 244–257.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.
Rudman, R., & Kruger, W. (2014). Using a group work project as an educational tool in management accounting education. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 13(3), 611–628.
SAICA. (2016). Competency framework: Detailed guidance for the academic programme.
Samkin, G., & Schneider, A. (2014). The accounting academic. Meditari Accountancy Research, 22(1), 2–19.
Shaw, M. E., Ackerman, B., McCown, N. E., Worsham, A. P., Haugh, L. D., Gebhardt, B. M., Small P.A. (1979). Interaction patterns and facilitation of peer learning. Small Group Research, 10(2), 214–223.
Shaw, M. E., & Small, P. A. (1981). Interaction patterns and facilitation of peer learning: Two replications. Small Group Research, 12(2), 233–240.
Slavin, R. E., & Karweit, N. L. (1981). Cognitive and affective outcomes of an intensive student team learning experience. Journal of Experimental Education, 50(1), 29–35.
Smit, S., & Steenkamp, G. (2015). The competencies developed in an undergraduate accounting course before SAICA’s competency framework was effective: A student’s perspective. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 8(2), 666–688.
Stainbank, L. (2003). Using an annual report as a group project in accounting education. Meditari Accountancy Research, 11, 151–166.
Stainbank, L. J. (2009). Working in teams: Improving the team experience. Meditari Accountancy Research, 17(1), 69–80.
Strauss-Keevy, M. (2014). Education programmes’ responsibilities regarding pervasive skills. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 7(2), 415–432.
Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41–54.
Watty, K., De Lange, P., Carr, R., O’Connell, B., Howieson, B., & Jacobsen, B. (2013). Accounting students’ feedback on feedback in Australian universities: They’re less than impressed. Accounting Education, 22(5), 467–488.
Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379–394.
Zipp, J. F. (2007). Learning by exams: The impact of two-stage cooperative tests. Teaching Sociology, 35(January), 62–76.
Copyright (c) 2019 Stephanus Jacobus Kruger
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
