Expanding the semantic range to enable meaningful real-world application in chemical engineering
Abstract
Legitimation Code Theory has proven to be useful in analysing the relationship between theory and practice. Semantic gravity can be used to illustrate teaching and learning processes that move between different levels of abstraction and context-dependency. Effective engineering education entails moving both up and down the semantic range in a way that enables students to apply concepts to contextual practices. However, students seldom engage at the strongest level of semantic gravity. This study investigated the contextualisation of theory in a chemical engineering programme through industrial site visits. Final-year chemical engineering students participated in a voluntary field trip to visit industrial sites. Data obtained through written surveys showed that visits allowed participants to develop a better appreciation for the relevance of taught material to industrial applications and to better understand relationships between different modules and problem solving. Site visits were found to be an effective way of expanding the semantic range.Downloads
References
Codling, A., and L.V. Meek. 2006. “Twelve propositions on diversity in higher education.” Higher Education Management and Policy 18 (3). doi:10.1787/hemp-v18-art17-en.
DHET. 2013. White Paper for post-school education and training. Pretoria: Department of Higher Education and Training. http://www.dhet.gov.za/SiteAssets/Latest%20News/White%20paper%20for%20post-school%20education%20and%20training.pdf.
Feisel, L., and A. Rosa. 2005. “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education.” Journal of Engineering Education 94 (1): 121-130. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.
Fletcher, A.J., A.W.A. Sharif, and M.D. Haw. 2017. “Using the perceptions of chemical engineering students and graduates to develop employability skills.” Education for Chemical Engineers 18: 11-25. doi:10.1016/j.ece.2016.07.001.
Griesel, H., and B. Parker. 2009. Graduate Attributes: a baseline study on South African graduates from the perspective on employers. Higher Education South Africa & South African Qualifications Authority. http://www.saqa.org.za/docs/genpubs/2009/graduate_attributes.pdf.
IEA. 2013. Graduate Attributes and Professional Competency Profiles. International Engineering Alliance. http://www.ieagreements.org.
manpowergroup.com. 2015. Talent Shortage Survey. USA: The Manpower Group.
Markom, M., M.S. Khalil, R. Misnon, N.A. Othman, S.R.S. Abdullah, and A.B. Mohamad. 2011. “Industrial talk and visit for students.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 18: 674-682. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.099.
Maton, K. 2014. Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London and New York: Routledge.
Maton, K. 2013. “Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building.” Linguistics and Education 24: 8-22. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.005.
Molzahn, M., and K. Wittstock. 2002. “Chemical engineers for the 21st century-challenges for university education.” Chemical engineering & technology 25 (3): 231. doi:10.1002/1521-4125(200203)25:3<231::AID-CEAT231>3.0.CO;2-S.
SAQA. 2014. Bachelor of Science: Engineering Standard. South African Qualifications Authority.
Schofield, D. 2012. “Mass effect: A chemical engieering education of virtual reality simulator technology.” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 8 (1): 63-78. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1499783914/fulltextPDF/4B0045070E6A4221PQ/1?accountid=14049.
Sen, T.K. 2013. “The importance of industrial visit to enhance students’ learning in Process Instrumentation and Control unit of engineering courses.” The European Conference on Education. Brighton, UK: The International Academic Forum. http://iafor.info/archives/offprints/ece2013-offprints/ECE2013_0117.pdf.
UNESCO. 2010. Engineering: issues, challenges and opportunities for development. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001897/189753e.pdf.
Wolmarans, N. 2016. “Inferential reasoning in design: Relations between material product and specialised disciplinary knowledge.” Design Studies 92-115. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.003.
Copyright (c) 2019 Christie Dorfling, Karin Elizabeth Wolff, Guven Akdogan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0