Soil Management in the Breede River Valley Wine Grape Region, South Africa. 1. Cover Crop Performance and Weed Control

  • J.C. Fourie ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, Stellenbosch, 7599 Republic of South Africa

Abstract

Eight cover crop treatments were applied for 12 consecutive years on a medium-textured soil in a vineyard near
Robertson (33Ëš50’S, 19Ëš54’E). A treatment with full surface straw mulch and full surface post-emergence chemical
control applied from just before grapevine bud break to harvest (BB), and one with no cover crop combined with BB,
were also applied. The control consisted of mechanical control in the work row and post-emergence chemical control
in the vine row applied from bud break to harvest. Rotating Triticale v. Usgen 18 (triticale) and Vicia dasycarpa Ten.
(vetch) did not improve the dry matter production (DMP) of either species. Average DMP decreased as follows:
triticale > Secale cereale L. v. Henog (rye)/Vicia faba L. v. Fiord (faba bean) mixture > triticale/vetch biennial
rotation > triticale/vetch annual rotation > vetch. Triticale (BB) resulted in total winter weed suppression from 1995
to 1996 and from 2001 to 2004. Total weed control from bud break to the pea size berry stage of the grapevines was
achieved with straw mulch (BB), triticale (BB), rye/faba bean mixture (BB) and triticale/vetch rotated biennially
(BB) from 2001 to 2003. For triticale combined with full surface post-emergence chemical control applied from
grapevine berry set (AB), and for triticale/vetch rotated annually (BB), this was restricted to 2001 and 2003. From
the pea size berry stage to harvest, straw mulch (BB), triticale (BB), vetch (BB), rye/faba bean mixture (BB) and
triticale (AB) reduced the weed stand significantly in comparison to the control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2016-12-09
Section
Articles