Determining the faculty specific academic literacies needs of first year university students: a mixed methods approach
Abstract
For three decades to date, South African universities have been concerned about the levels of academic readiness, also known as the articulation gap, among first time entrants to higher education. The general opinion is that we need further reliable and valid indicators of how prepared high school leavers are to cope with the demands of academic education. This has necessitated both pre- and post-admission assessments, following the administration of which foundational academic support programmes are put in place to help students bridge the articulation gap. These support programmes have included those focusing on developing academic literacies, a multifaceted competence comprising the ability to cope with the discourse demands of academic education. The purpose of these support programmes requires that a proper needs analysis be carried out if they are to have a positive impact on students’ effort to boost their ability to bridge the articulation gap. The aim of this article is to demonstrate how this needs analysis was accomplished for academic literacies through a combination of quantitative and qualitative means. It uses a sample of Law students (n=234) and students in the faculty of Economics and Management Sciences (EMS) (n=2944) at Stellenbosch University to accomplish the quantitative part, and a total of two EMS and three Law lecturer interviewees to realize the qualitative dimension.
Downloads
References
Bachman, L.F. & Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boughey, C. & McKenna, S. 2016. Academic literacy and the decontextualized learner. Critical Studies in Language Learning 4(2): 1-10.
Carstens, A. 2010. The role of a genre-based approach in writing instruction for undergraduate students in the humanities and social sciences. PhD thesis, University of Pretoria.
Cliff, A.F. 2015. The National Benchmark Test in Academic Literacy: how might it be used to support teaching in higher education? Language Matters 46(1): 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2015.1027505
Cliff, A.F. & Hanslo, M. 2009. The design and use of ‘alternate’ assessment of academic literacy as selection mechanism in higher education. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 27(3): 265-276. https://doi.org/10.2989/SALALS.2009.27.3.5.939
Cliff A.F., Ramaboa, K. & Pearce C. 2007. The assessment of entry-level students’ academic literacy: does it matter? Ensovoort 11(2): 33-48.
Cliff, A.F. & Yeld, N. 2006. Test domains and constructs: academic literacy. In Griesel, H. (ed.). Access and entry level benchmarks: the National Benchmark Tests project. Pretoria: Higher Education South Africa, pp 19-27.
Council on Higher Education (CHE). 2013. A proposal for undergraduate curriculum reform in South Africa: the case a flexible curriculum structure. Pretoria. Council on Higher Education.
Cummins, J. 1984. Bilingualism and special education: issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Cummins, J. 1996. Negotiating identities: education for empowerment in a diverse society. Ontario, Cal.: California Association for Bilingual Education.
Cummins, J. 2009. Fundamental psychological and sociological principles underlying educational success for linguistic minority students. In Skutnab-Kangas, T., Phillipson, R., Mohanty, A.K. & Panda, M. (eds.) Social justice through multilingual education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 19-35.
Griesel, H. 2006. The context of the National Benchmark Tests Project. In Griesel, H. (ed.). Access and entry level benchmarks: the National Benchmark Tests project. Pretoria: Higher Education South Africa. 1-6.
Jacobs, C. 2013. Academic literacies and the question of knowledge. Journal for Language Teaching 47(2): 127-139. https://doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v47i2.7
Lea M.R. & Street B.V. 2006. Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education 23(2): 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Nation, I.S.P., & Macalister, J. 2010. Language curriculum design. New York: Routledge.
National Benchmark Tests Project. 2015. Standard setting workshop. Unpublished information pack. Cape Town: Higher Education South Africa.
Richards, J.C. 2001. Curriculum development in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Van Rensburg, C. & Weideman, A. 2002. Language proficiency: current strategies, future remedies. Journal for Language Teaching 36(1&2): 162-164. https://doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v36i1-2.6010
Weideman, A. 2017. Responsible design in applied linguistics: theory and practice. Cham: Springer. [eBook]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41731-8
ISSN: 