Pseudo social media classrooms

Sharing control with “the audience” as an academic literacy practitioner on an online platform

Keywords: academic literacy, social media, game shows, control empowerment, community, student engagement

Abstract

In the academic literacy (AL) class, fostering engagement between educators and students in the online environment is challenging. However, sharing control in the online classroom provides a solution which assists in overcoming this, as well as engaging students academically. Interestingly, because students are familiar with game shows and social media, where they are used to sharing opinions, simulation of this in the online class may provide a solution to participation on an academic platform.  In popular game shows, there is a powershift when the audience gains more control through participation, which ultimately improves ratings (Enli & Ihlebæk, 2011). The same tactic can be applied to online learning with tools (such as Polls, Like buttons, Mic and Chat functions) especially in Academic Literacy where student expression is so important. Not only is there a shift in the power dynamic in a classroom, but students experience a sense of community which increases engagement, as well as vital academic literacy skills. Thus, this paper seeks to demonstrate how a control-sensitive classroom can enhance student engagement and success in an online academic literacy classroom by analysis of student perspectives through qualitative and quantitative data.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Louri Louw, University of the Free State, South Africa

Louri Louw has been an academic literacy facilitator at the University of the Free State for 10 years. She is also in the privileged position to teach creative writing at The Central University of Technology. Driven by a passion to enhance student learning, her current research interests lie in increasing student engagement in the online environment.

Linda Sparks, University of the Free State, South Africa

Linda Sparks is a lecturer, researcher and academic literacy coordinator on access programmes at Academic Language and Literacy Development, at the University of the Free State. Research interests include blended learning, innovation in teaching and learning, curriculum design, social justice, decolonisation, gender studies, language acquisition, and language and literature studies.

References

Boughey, C. & McKenna, S. 2021. Understanding higher education: Alternative perspectives. Cape Town: African Minds.

Brunner, J. 1983. Child’s talk. New York: Norton.

Bryman, A., Bell, E., Hirschohn, P., Dos Santos, Du Toit, J., Wagner, C., Van Aardt, I. & Masenge, A. 2014. Research methodology:Business management contexts. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

Campbell, J. 2022. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

Carini, M., Kuh, G. & Klein, S. 2006. Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education 47: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9

Carstens, A. 2012. Using literacy narratives to scaffold academic literacy in the Bachelor of Education: A pedagogical framework. Journal for Language Teaching 46(2): 9-25. https://doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v46i2.1

Carstens, A. & Rambiritch, A. 2020. Theoretical grounding of writing centre practices: A foundation for tutor training. Journal for Language Teaching 54(1): 235-251. https://doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v54i1.7

Chou, P. & Chen, H. 2008. Engagement in online collaborative learning: A case study using a Web 2.0 tool. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 4(4): 574-582. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no4/chou_1208.pdf [Accessed: 14 April 2023].

Creswell, J. & Plano Clark, V. 2017. Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Cummins, J. 2009. Pedagogies of choice: challenging coercive relations of power in classrooms and communities. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 12(3): 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050903003751

Cunliffe, A. 2008. Orientations to social constructionism: Relationally responsive social constructionism and its implications for knowledge and learning. Management Learning 39(2): 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607087578

Dixson, M.D. 2010. Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10(2): 1-13.

Commission of the European Communities. 2001. Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament: the e-Learning action plan. Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0172:FIN:EN:PDF [Accessed: 29 April 2022].

Enli, S. & Ihlebæk, K. 2011. ‘Dancing with the audience’: Administrating vote-ins in public and commercial broadcasting. Media, Culture & Society 33(6): 953-962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711412299

Felszeghy, S., Pasonen-Seppänen., S, Koskela, A., Nieminen, P., Härkönen, K., Paldanius, K., Gabbouj, S., Ketola, K., Hildene, M., Lundin, M., Haapaniemi, T., Sointu, E., Bauman, E., Gilbert, E, Morton, D. & Mahonen, A. 2019. Using online game-based platforms to improve student performance and engagement in histology teaching. BMC Medical Education (19): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1701-0

Gay, G. & Betts, K. 2020. From discussion forums to eMeetings: integrating high touch strategies to increase student engagement, academic performance, and retention in large online courses. Online Learning Journal 24(1): 92-117.

Gaytan, J. 2013. Integrating social media into the learning environment of the classroom: following social constructivism principles. Journal of Applied Research for Business Instruction 11(1): 1-6.

Hedding, D., Greve, M., Breetzke, G., Nel, W. & Jansen van Vuuren, B. 2020. COVID-19 and the academe in South Africa: Not business as usual. South African Journal of Science 116: 7-8. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/8298

Kelm, O. 2011. Social media: It’s what students do. Business Communication Quarterly 74(4):505-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569911423960

Löfström, E. & Nevgi, A. 2007. From strategic planning to meaningful learning: diverse perspectives on the development of web-based teaching and learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Teaching 38(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00625.x

Leslie, H.J. 2020. Trifecta of student engagement: A framework for an online teaching professional development course for faculty in higher education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning 13(2): 149-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2018-0024

Liu, X., Magjuka, R.J., Bonk, C.J., & Lee, S. 2007. Does sense of community matter? An examination of participants’ perceptions of building learning communities in online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 8(1): 9-24.

Makalela, L. 2018. Community elders’ narrative accounts of “ubuntu” translanguaging: Learning and teaching in African education. International Review of Education. 64: 823-843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-018-9752-8

Marais, S., Nel, M., & Fourie, J. 2019. Student perception on a supplementary multimodal tool for academic literacy: A pilot study. Journal for Language Teaching 53(2): 73-93. https://doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v53i2.4

Martin, F. & Bolliger, D.U. 2018. Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning Journal 22(1): 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Moore, C. 2021. Access to learning: Blending into the altered normal. Annual University of the Free State Learning and Teaching Conference: Quality and Innovation for a New Blended Learning Future, Bloemfontein, 13-15 September 2021.

Muir, T., Douglas, T., & Tremble, A. 2020. Facilitation strategies for enhancing the learning and engagement of online students. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 17(3): 7-19.

Nicolaas, G., Campanelli, P., Hope, S. & Jäckle, A. 2015. Revisiting “yes/no” versus “check all that apply”: Results from a mixed modes experiment. Survey Research Methods. 9 (3): 189-204. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i3.6151

Nyamnjoh, F. 2017. Incompleteness: Frontier Africa and the currency of conviviality. Journal of Asian and African Studies 52(3): 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909615580867

O’Brien, H. & Toms, E. 2008. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59: 938–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20801.

Osman, R. 2020 in Walwyn, R.D. 2020. Teaching on the edge of chaos: Report on ‘The future of universities in a post-COVID-19 world’. South African Journal of Science 116 (7-8). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/8404

Oviave, J. O. (2016). How to rediscover the ubuntu paradigm in education. International Review of Education, 62(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9545-x

Patterson, R. & Weideman, A. 2013. The refinement of a construct for tests of academic literacy. Journal for Language Teaching 47(1): 125-151. https://doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v47i1.6

Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M.J., & Lui, J. 2005. School climate: Sense of classroom and school communities in online and on-campus higher education courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 6(4): 361-374.

Schreiber, L.M. & Valle, B.E. 2013. Social constructivist teaching strategies in the small group classroom. Small Group Research 44(4): 395-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413488422

Seok, S. 2008. Teaching aspects of E-Learning. International Journal on E-Learning 7(4), 725-741.

Song, H., Kim, J., & Wen, L. 2016. Teacher-student relationship in online classes: A role of teacher self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior (54): 436-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.037

Sprinivasan, S. and Lopes, C. A. 2020. Mediated sociability: audience participation and convened citizen engagement in interactive broadcast shows in Africa. International Journal of Communication (14): 2985- 3006.

Syvertsen, T. 2006. TV and multi-platform media hybrids: corporate strategies and regulatory dilemmas. In Trappel, F. Marcinkowski & W. Meier (eds.) Media and democracy, experience from Europe, 253–273. Bern: Haupt Verlag.

Tamrat, W. & Teferra, D. 2020. COVID-19 Threat to Higher Education: Africa’s Challenges, Responses, and Apprehensions. International Higher Education 102: 28-30. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004513488_060

Thomas, L., Herbert, J., & Teras, M. (2014). A sense of belonging to enhance participation, success and retention in online programs. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education 5(2): 69. https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v5i2.233

Universities South Africa (USAf). 2020. Emergency teaching and learning during the COVID-19 Era. Pretoria: USAf. https://www.usaf.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Emergency-Teaching-and-Learning-During-the-COVID-19-era.pdf [Accessed: 26 April 2022]

Van Rooy, B. & Coetzee-Van Rooy, S. 2015. The language issue and academic performance at a South African University. Southern African Linguistics & Applied Language Studies 33(1): 31-46. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2015.1012691

Van Schalkwyk, F. 2021. Reflections on the public university sector and the Covid-19 pandemic in South Africa. Studies in Higher Education (46):1: 44-58. https://doi.org/1080/03075079.2020.1859682

Van Wyk, A. 2014. English-medium education in a multilingual setting: A case in South Africa. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 52(2):205-220. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2014-0009

Veletsianos, G. 2020. Learning online: The student experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Vygotsky, L.S. 1962. Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Walwyn, R.D. 2020. Teaching on the edge of chaos: Report on ‘The future of universities in a post-COVID-19 world’. South African Journal of Science 116 (7-8). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/8404

Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counter-publics. Public Culture 14 (1): 49-90. http://castillocorrales.fr/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Michael-Warner-Publics-Short.pdf [Accessed: 26 April 2022].

Watson, J. 2001. Social constructivism in the classroom. Support for Learning 16(3): 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.00206

Young, S. & Bruce, M.A. 2011. Classroom community and student engagement in online courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 7(2): 219-230. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no2/young_0611.pdf [Accessed: 26 April 2022].

Published
2023-05-29
How to Cite
Louw, L., & Sparks, L. (2023). Pseudo social media classrooms: Sharing control with “the audience” as an academic literacy practitioner on an online platform. Journal for Language Teaching , 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.56285/jltVol57iss1a5204