Efficiency assessment of public universities in South Africa, 2009-2013: Panel data evidence
Abstract
With ever increasing enrolments of students into the public universities and limited funding, assessing the efficiency of universities is vital for effective allocation and utilisation of educational resources. Are higher education institutions in South Africa making the most efficient use of resources made available to them? This study attempts to provide an answer to this question. We apply a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach to assess technical efficiency (TE) of 22 public universities in South Africa for the period 2009 to 2013. A university is said to be efficient if it is producing maximum output (number of graduates and publications) from a minimum quantity of inputs (number of staff, students’ enrolments, and expenditure). The results indicates that over the study period the average TE of universities declined from 0.83 to 0.78. Research-intensive universities were more efficient than professional-oriented universities. These results can help key decision makers such as the Commission on Higher Education and universities management in identifying possibilities for improving institutional performance by identifying their strengths and weaknesses and benchmarking with their peers.References
Abbott, M. and Doucouliagos, C. 2003. The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review, 22(1): 89-97.
Abbott, M. and Doucouliagos, C. 2009. Competition and efficiency: overseas students and technical efficiency in Australian and New Zealand universities. Education Economics, 17(1): 31-57.
Agasisti, T. and Haelermans, C. 2016. Comparing Efficiency of Public Universities among E uropean Countries: Different Incentives Lead to Different Performances. Higher Education Quarterly, 70(1): 81-104.
AL-Tyeb, L. E. 2017. The Efficiency For Education Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology 4(3): 6845-6850.
Alabdulmenem, F.M. 2017. Measuring the Efficiency of Public Universities: Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to Examine Public Universities in Saudi Arabia. International Education Studies, 10(1): 137-143.
Aziz, N.A.A., Janor, R.M. and Mahadi, R. 2013. Comparative departmental efficiency analysis within a university: a DEA approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90: 540-548.
Bangi, Y.I. 2014. Efficiency assessment of tanzanian private universities: Data envelopment analysis (DEA). International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 2 No, 5.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429-444.
Chuanyi, W., Xiaohong, L. and Shikui, Z. 2016. The Relative Efficiencies of Research Universities of Science and Technology in China: Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(10).
Cloete, N., 2016. For sustainable funding and fees, the undergraduate system in South Africa must be restructured. South African Journal of Science, 112(3-4): 1-5.
Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O'Donnell, C.J. and Battese, G.E. 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.
Council of Higher Education [CHE]. 2007. Review of Higher Education in South Africa: selected themes. Pretoria, South Africa. https://www.che.ac.za/sites/default/files/publications/Review_HE_SA_2007_Complete_0.pdf
Farrell, M.J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120(3): 253-281.
Fedderke, J., De Kadt, R. and Luiz, J. 2003. Capstone or deadweight? Inefficiency, duplication and inequity in South Africa's tertiary education system, 1910–93. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(3): 377-400.
Flegg, A.T., Allen, D.O., Field, K. and Thurlow, T.W. 2004. Measuring the efficiency of British universities: a multi‐period data envelopment analysis. Education Economics, 12(3): 231-249.
Johnes, Jill. 2014. Efficiency and Mergers in English Higher Education 1996/97 to 2008/9: Parametric and Non‐parametric Estimation of the Multi‐input Multi‐output Distance Function. The Manchester School, 82(4): 465-487.
Kantabutra, S. and Tang, J.C. 2010. Efficiency analysis of public universities in Thailand. Tertiary Education and Management, 16(1): 15-33.
Katharaki, M. and Katharakis, G. 2010. A comparative assessment of Greek universities’ efficiency using quantitative analysis. International journal of educational research, 49(4-5): 115-128.
Marire, J. 2017. Are South African public universities economically efficient? Reflection amidst higher education crisis. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(3): 116-137.
McMillan, M.L. and Datta, D., 1998. The relative efficiencies of Canadian universities: a DEA perspective. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 24(4): 485-511.
Munoz, D.A. 2016. Assessing the research efficiency of higher education institutions in Chile: A data envelopment analysis approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6): 809-825.
Taylor, B. and Harris, G. 2004. Relative efficiency among South African universities: A data envelopment analysis. Higher Education, 47(1): 73-89.
SAUVCA [South African Universities Vice-Chancellors Association]. 2002. A Vision for South African Higher Education —transformation, restructuring & policy integration. A contribution to sectoral coherence, in response to the Minister of Education's restructuring proposals gazetted on 24 June 2002.
UFISA Project (User Centered Design for Innovative Services and Applications). 2017. South African Higher Education: Facts and Figures. Higher Education in Context. http://ufisa.aalto.fi/en/network/cput/facts_figures_section.pdf
Van der Berg, S. 2007. Apartheid's enduring legacy: Inequalities in education. Journal of African Economies, 16(5): 849-880.
Visbal-Cadavid, D., Martínez-Gómez, M. and Guijarro, F. 2017. Assessing the efficiency of public universities through DEA. A case study. Sustainability, 9(8): 1416.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
