Perceptions of male professors and male students towards gender equity policies and practices in a Mexican higher education science and engineering graduate program

A. Masinire, E. Sanchez-Cruz

Abstract


One of the critical indicators of a gender equal society is the proportional and balanced representation of male and female in all spheres of life. Within the higher education sector in Mexico, gender transformation and equality is measured through the proxy of increased access of female students in higher education. Such demographic changes are occurring as a response to feminist demands for gender equality. While we acknowledge the physical visibility of female academics and students in higher education, this has not been achieved without opposition from male defenders of the status quo. In this study we examine the perceptions of male students and male faculty with regards to the gender policies and their attitudes to the presence of more female students taking up Sciences and Engineering graduate programs. Focusing on the perspectives of men is crucial in gender issues since transformation which does not involving men will likely be opposed by men in defence of gender privileges. The findings reflect that male academics and students men were caught up in conflicting position of accepting the policies in principle but rejecting them in practice. This contradiction arose from deeply internalized and normalized gender stereotypes which deserve educational attention and pedagogical intervention. Officially, the gender policy has affirmed female access and participation in the Science and Engineering graduate program at NPI. However, cultural and institutional gender regimes have not yet aligned themselves to the new policy framework. The question remains as to whether men can change their perceptions about traditional gender roles and responsibilities in order to leverage gender equity and transformation for women justice. Despite literature that suggests that men should be partakers in the fight for gender equality, findings in this study have no affirmative answer to the question.


Keywords


Gender Equity Policies, transformation, Higher Education Mexico

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bustos Romero, O. 2003. Mujeres y educacion superior en Mexico: Recomposicion de la matricula universitaria a favour de las mujeres reperrcusiones educativas, economicas y sociales. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/ries/v3n6/v3n6a1.pdf (Accessed 17 July 2011).

Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. 2008. Mexico: Adoption of the General Law on Women's Access to a Life Free of Violence (Ley General de Accesso de las Mujeres a una Vida Libre de Violencia), its implementation regulations, and local implementation laws in the Federal District and the states of Mexico, Jalisco and Querétaro. MEX102833.FE https://www.refworld. org/docid/48a3028817.html (Accessed 10 June 2019).

Chant, S. and M. C. Gutmann. 2002. Men-streaming gender? Questions for gender and development policy in the twenty-first century. Progress in Gender Studies 2(4): 269‒282.

Connell, R. W. 1995. The men and the boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Connell, R. W. 2003. The role of men and boys in achieving gender equality. Expert Group Meeting, Brazil, Brasilia 21‒24 October.

Connell, R. W. 2005 Change among the gatekeepers: Men, masculinities, and gender equality in the global arena. Signs 30(3): 1801‒1825. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/427525

Cornwall, A. and S. C. White. 2000. Men, masculinities and development: Politics, policies and practice. IDS Bulletin 31(2): 1‒6.

Cornwall, A. 2007. Revisiting the gender agenda. IBS Bulletin 38(2): 69‒78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1759-5436.2007.tb00353

Diario Oficial de la Federacion. 2007. Ley General de Acceso de las mujeres a una vida libre de violencia. http://www.diutados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LGAMVLV.pdf (Accessed 12 July 2010).

ECLAC see Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. n.d. Regional Conference on Women in Latin America and the Caribbean. https://www.cepal.org/en/subsidiary-bodies/regional-conference-women-latin-america-and-caribbean

Estadistica Institucional Trienio. 2004‒2006. Instituto Polítecnico Nacional, Secretaría Técnica Dirección de Evaluación. http://www.gestionestrategica.ipn.mx/Evaluacion/Documents/ Estadistica/ESTADISTICATRIENIO3BCD.PDF

Greig, A., M. Kimmel and J. Lang. 2000. Men, masculinities and development: Broadening our work towards gender equality and development. New York: Gender and Development Programme.

Inmujeres. 2018. Acerca de. https://www.inmujeres.cdmx.gob.mx/instituto/acerca

Kabeer, N. 2001. Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh. World Development 29: 63‒84.

Mohanty, C. T. 1988. “Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourse.” Feminist Review 3: 61‒88.

Mohanty, C. T. 2003. Feminism without borders: Decolonising theory, practising solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.

Mohanty, C. T., A. Russo and L. Torres 1991. Third world and the politics of feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Moss, D. 2006. Gender, space and time: Women and higher education. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Narayan, D., R. Patel, K. Schaff, A. Rademacher and S. Koch-Schulte. 2000. Can anyone hear us? Voices of the poor. New York: World Bank Publications.

IPN. n.d. Que es el PIGPG. http://www.genero.ipn.mx:70/genero/nuestro_hacer.jsp

Razavi, S. and C. Miller. 1995. From WID to GAD: Conceptual shifts in the women and development discourse. Occasional Paper 1. United Nations Development Program.

Rizvi, F. and B. Lingard. 2010. Globalising education policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sanchez, A. R. 2003. Escolaridad y trabajo femeninos en el context de la division generic de profesiones y oficios, version actualizada del mismo document publicado por la ENEP Acatlan-UNAM, Mexico.

Sanchez-Cruz, E. 2012. Women in science and engineering: Impact of gender equity policies in Mexican Higher Education. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Western Ontario. https://ir.lib. uwo.ca/etd/433.

Sanchez-Cruz, E. and N. Cruz-Cortes. 2015. Mexican gender policies in practice: Two grad students. International Journal of Gender in Developing Societies 1(1): 63‒76.

SEP. 2003. Informe Nacional Sobre la Educacion Superior en Mexico.www.anuies.mx/e_proyetos/ pdf/Pro_seminario.pdf/ (Accessed 24 November 2010).

Sher, G. 1975. Justifying reverse discrimination in employment. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4(2): 159‒170.

Stromquist, N. P. 2015. Reflections on future tasks. Gender and Education 27(2): 109‒113.

Tarrés, M. L. 2006. Nuevos nudos y desafíos en las prácticas feministas: Los institutos de las mujeres en México, en N. Lebon y E. Maier (comps.).

Tripathy, J. 2009. The truncated narrative of gender and development. International Journal of Development Issues 8(1): 4‒17.

United Nations. 2009. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw

Yeboah, T., R. Serbeh and P. Bembir. 2015. Omission of men in gender development theory and praxis: A pathway for addressing the plights of women. Journal of Social Sciences 11(1): 7‒19.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/34-3-3483

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


eISSN: 1753-5913

Copyright © 2016 South African Journal of Higher Education

Hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2016.

Creative Commons License -CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Disclaimer:
This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.