Students' experiences of human-centred interventions in a design education setting
Abstract
International and national developments in graphic design practice have incorporated unprecedented levels of engagement with end-user clients and audiences. However, instructional graphic design courses for undergraduates have not kept pace with this trend or with associated professional practice expectations. Traditionally, graphic design practice relies on the ‘expert’, autocratic knowledge of the designer regarding the expected outcomes of the design brief. The use of co-operative tools and techniques such as human-centred design (HCD) enables the process to become a more democratic co-creation experience, where the client participants actively contribute to the development of the final design product. To prepare students for the new relationship between designers and end-users, newly developed HCD project interventions were created as part of the Communication Design modules offered in the third year Graphic Design Diploma programme at a University of Technology in South Africa. This paper reports on two human-centred interventions in different settings and involving different types of stakeholders, with a view to analysing the experiences of students as they conducted the projects to assess the viability of the HCD projects towards establishing a proposed new curriculum that incorporates aspects of HCD as a fundamental approach to graphic design practice.
References
Barnes, V. and V. du Preez. 2015. Mapping empathy and ethics in the design process. Proceedings of DEFSA Ethics and accountability in Design: Do they matter? 1 -4 September. Midrand Graduate Institute, Midrand. South Africa.
Buchanan, R. (2001). The problem of character in design education: liberal arts and professional specialization. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11(1), 13-26.
Boehnert, J. 2014. Design vs. The design industry. Design Philosophy Papers 12 (2): 119–136.
Di Russo, S. 2016. Understanding the behaviour of design thinking in complex environments. PhD Thesis. Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Frascara, J. 2007. Bad words in design education. Design Issues 23(4):62-68.
Grosfoguel, R. 2007. The epistemic decolonial turn. Cultural Studies 21(2): 211 – 223.
Hagen, P. 2011. A practice-based study of social technologies in early design research. PhD thesis. University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Hanington, B.M. 2005. Research education by design: assessing the impact of pedagogy on practice. Paper presented at the Joining Forces conference, 22-24 September, University of Art and Design, Helsinki, Finland.
IDEO team. 2013. Human-centered design (HCD) toolkit: design thinking toolkit for social innovation project. 2nd ed. The Creative Commons Attribution, Non-Commercial, Share A-Like 3.0 Unported License.
Kirstein, M. 2014. Exploring conversance with ‘research for design’ methods in communication design companies. MA thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: a new foundation for design. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Moalosi, R, Rapitsenyane, Y and M. M’Rithaa. 2010. An analysis of sustainability issues in Southern African design institutions’ programmes. Proceedings of Sustainability in Design: Now! LeNS Conference, 29 September – 1 October, Bangalore, India.
Taffe, S. 2013. Undesigning graphic design: facilitating the artist in everyone, inter-discipline. The Art Association of Australia and New Zealand Annual Conference, (AAANZ 2013), Melbourne, Australia, 7-9 December 2013.
Taffe, S. 2015. The hybrid designer/end-user: Revealing paradoxes in co-design. Design Studies 40: 39-59.
Sanders, E. and B. Westurland. 2011. Experiencing, exploring and experimenting in and with co-design spaces. Nordic Design Research Conference 2011, Helsinki. [O] Available: http://www.maketools.com/articlespapers/SandersWesterlundNordes2011.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2015.
Copyright (c) 2019 Katarzyna Anna Chmela-Jones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
