The impact of the neoliberal technological epoch and Covid-19 on the decolonization of the university curriculum

Abstract

In this article we will argue that South Africa’s capitalist neoliberal agenda for higher education, where the focus is on the shift from a knowledge economy to a digital economy, will choke the life of indigenous knowledge out of the university curriculum. To support this claim the article discusses, firstly, the impact of the core neoliberal ideals on the university curriculum landscape. Secondly, drawing on the scholarly work of Martin Heidegger and his anticipation of the spirit of the time in the technological epoch, the article shows how humans in this era will be viewed as a heap of fungible raw materials, resources, or standing reserve (Bestand) awaiting optimisation. In this technological age knowledge is subject to the demands of the market, where the focus will be exclusively on knowledge that has a utilitarian value in and impact on the technological epoch. A direct consequence of this is that little space will be provided for the inclusion of indigenous knowledge in the curriculum. We conclude by showing how the current Covid-19 pandemic dismissed the voices and disregarded the efforts of indigenous healers in the fight against the pandemic. All these developments illustrate government’s power to impose its neoliberal agenda on the university that will ultimately lead to the detriment and neglect of indigenous knowledge.

Author Biographies

O. Koopman, Cape Peninsula University of Technology
SP-FET Deaprtment  - Senior Lecturer
K. J. Koopman, University of the Western Cape
Department of Educational Studies

References

Baker, Aryn. 2020. “Could it work as a cure? Maybe. A herbal remedy for coronavirus is a hit in Africa, but experts have their doubts.†Times. http://www.google.co.za/amp/s/time.com/5840148/ coronavirus-cure-covid-madagascar/%3famp=tru (Accessed March 2020).

Barnett, Ronald. 2012. The future university: Ideas and possibilities. New York: Routledge.

Belu, Dana. 2017. Heidegger, reproductive technology and the motherless age. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2011. Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press.

Department of Higher Education and Training. 1997. White Paper 1 on the Transformation of Higher Education. Pretoria: DHET

Department of Higher Education and Training. 2001. National Development Plan. Pretoria: DHET

Department of Higher Education and Training. 2013. White Paper for Post-School Education. Pretoria: DHET.

DHET see Department of Higher Education and Training.

Etieyibo, Edwin. 2016. “Why ought the philosophy curriculum in universities in Africa be Africanised?†South African Journal of Philosophy 35(4): 404–417.

Foucault, Michel. 1978. “Governmentalityâ€. In The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, ed G. Burgell, C. Gordon, and P Milner. Memel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Geniusz, Wendy. 2009. Our knowledge is not primitive: Decolonising botanical Anishinaabe teaching. New York: Routledge.

Heidegger, Martin. 1967. Being and time. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. London: SCM Press.

Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The question concerning technology and other essays. Transalated by W. Lovitt. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

Khoo, Su-ming, Witold Mucha, Christina Pesch, and Cori Wielenga. 2020. “Epistemic (in)justice and decolonisation in higher education: Experiences of cross-site teaching project.†Acta Academica 52(1): 54‒75.

Koopman, Oscar. 2019. “Is the decolonisation of the South African university curriculum possible in a neoliberal culture?†Alternation 24: 48–69.

Koopman, Oscar. 2018. “Towards decolonising teaching strategies: How to domesticate and infuse Western knowledge with indigenous knowledge.†Journal of Education 74: 102–116.

Le Grange, Lesley. 2016. “Decolonising the university curriculum.†South African Journal of Higher Education 30(2): 1‒12.

Le Grange, Lesley, Petro du Preez, Labby Ramrathan, and Sylvan Blignaut. 2020. “Decolonising the university curriculum or decolonial washing? A multiple case study.†Journal of Education 80: 25–49.

Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Makgatho, Lesego. 2020. “Our herbs can help with Covid-19, say traditional healers.†Times independent. https://www.iol.co.za/sundayindependent/news/our-herbs-can-help-with-covid-19-say-traditional-healers-47793844 (Accessed August 2020)

Maurial, Mahia. 1999. “Indigenous knowledge and schooling: A continuing between conflict and dialogue.†In What is indigenous knowledge: Voices from the academy, ed L. Semali, and J. Kincheloe. New York: Farmer Press.

Ogunniyi, Meshach, and Masakata Ogawa. 2008. The prospects and challenges of training South African and Japanese educators to enact an indigenised science curriculum. South African Journal of Higher Education 22(1): 175–190.

Peters, Michael. 2001. Poststructuralism, Marxism and Neoliberalism: Between theory and politics. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Popper, Karl. 1972. Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford University Press.

Postma, Dirk. 2016. “The ethics of becoming in a pedagogy for social justice.†South African Journal of Higher Education 30(3): 310‒328.

Schwab, Klaus. 2016. The fourth industrial revolution, Davos 2016. http://www.weforum.org/ agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond (Accessed 13 March 2018).

Semali, Ladislaus, and Joe Kincheloe. 1999. Introduction: “What is indigenous knowledge and why should we study it.†In What is indigenous knowledge: Voices from the academy, ed L. Semali, and J. Kincheloe. New York: Farmer Press.

Steger, Manfred, and Ravi Roy. 2010. Neoliberalism: A very short introduction. London: Oxford Press.

Turnbull, David. 2000. Masons, tricksters and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. New York: Routledge

Vally, Salim. 2020. “Between the vision of yesterday and the reality of today: Forging a pedagogy of possibility.†Education as Change 24: 1‒24.

Varela, Francisco, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Waghid, Yusef. 2014. Towards an African philosophy of education. New York: Routledge.

Waghid, Yusef. 2018. Towards an African university of critique. Paper presented at the 2nd Philosophy and Theory of Higher Education Conference. Hosted by the University of Sussex, London. 7‒ 9 September 2018.

World Health Organisation Africa. 2020. “WHO supports scientifically-proven traditional medicine.†https://www.afro.who.int/news/who-supports-scientifically-proven-traditional-medicine (Accessed August 2020).

WHO see World Health Organisation.

Published
2021-03-21
How to Cite
Koopman, O., & Koopman, K. J. (2021). The impact of the neoliberal technological epoch and Covid-19 on the decolonization of the university curriculum. South African Journal of Higher Education, 35(1), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.20853/35-1-4410
Section
Special Section