Effective student feedback as a marker for student success
Abstract
Enhancing the learning journey of a student requires feedback that is thoughtful, relevant and in-depth. Nicol (2010) as cited by UNSW Sydney (2018) stated that “feedback is valuable when it is received, understood and acted on. How students analyse, discuss and act on feedback is as important as the quality of the feedback itself”. This sentiment is echoed by Hattie (1999), also cited by UNSW Sydney (2018), when he stated that “feedback is the most powerful single moderator that enhances achievement”. Feedback is one of the most important activities undertaken by educators in the realm of higher education. A student learning journey devoid of reliable, clear, consistent, and efficient feedback is a journey that is devoid of growth, cognitive development, intellectual challenge, and possibly even success.
The theoretical value and benefits of feedback in the teaching and learning process is well-documented. Therefore, it is an epistemological conundrum when further evidence indicates that students’ attitudes to feedback is either indifferent or totally negative. The feedback process is one of symbiosis between the educator and the student, with no one element of this relationship being more important than the other. The manner in which feedback is provided by the educator and the manner of engagement by the student determines the success of the process. A survey at a private higher education institution investigates the quality of feedback provided by educators and the extent to which the students on the receiving end engage with and act on the feedback received.
References
Bellon, J. J., E. C. Bellon and M. A. Blank. 1991. Teaching from a research knowledge base: A development and renewal process. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. doi:10.12691/education-6-6-16.
Boud, D. 2000. Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education:151‒167. doi:10.1080/713695728.
Bourdieu, P. (Ed.). 2008. Key concepts. Durham, Acumen Publishing Limited. doi:10.1080/014256904200026989.
Cuseo, J. n.d. Student success: Definition, outcomes, principles and practices. Marymount College. http://indstateedu (Accessed 15 September 2018).
Copple, C. and S. Bredekamp. 2009. Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id (Accessed 18 November 2019).
Dison, L., Y. Shalem and D. Langsford. 2019. Resourcefulness matters: Student patterns for coping with structural academic challenges. South African Journal of Higher Education 33(4): 76‒93. http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/33-4-2831 (Accessed 29 May 2020).
Douglas, M. F. 2007. Enhancing student learning using online submission and feedback to improve first year learning experience. Paper presented at the Business, Management, Accountancy & Finance Conference, 2‒4 May 2007. Birmingham. http://www.reap.ac.uk/reap/public/papers (Accessed 14 July 2018).
Douglas, T., S. Salter, M. Dowlman and R. Eri. 2016. The feedback process: Perspectives of first and second year undergraduate students in the disciplines of education, health science and nursing. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 13(1): 1‒19. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/ vol13/iss1/3 (Accessed 29 May 2020).
Hassel, S. and N. Ridout. 2018. An investigation of first-year students’ and lecturers’ expectations of university education. Frontiers in Psychology 8(22): 1‒13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02218.
Koshy, V. 2010. Action research for improving education practice: A step-by-step guide. 2nd Edition. London: Sage Publications.
Martens, R., C. de Brabander, J. Rozendaal, M. Boekaerts and R. van der Leeden. 2010. Inducing mind sets in self-regulated learning and motivational information. Educational Studies 36(3): 311‒327. www.researchgate.net/publication/248968680_inducing_mind_sets_in_self-regulating_learning (Accessed 25 May 2020).
Naylor, R., C. Baik, C. Asmar and K. Watty. 2014. Good feedback practices: Prompts and guidelines for reviewing and enhancing feedback for students. Melbourne. http://Melbourne-cshe.unimelb. edu.au/data (Accessed 14 July 2018).
Nicol, D. 2007. Principles of good assessment and feedback: Theory and practice. www.York.ac.uk/ media (Accessed 15 July 2018).
Nicol, D. 2009. The first year experience: Transforming assessment and feedback: Enhancing integration and empowerment in the first year. Mansfield, UK: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/11605/1 (Accessed 15 July 2018).
Nicol, D. 2010. From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education, assessment and evaluation in higher education 35(5): 501‒517. www.tandfonline.com/ doi/abs/10.1080/02602931003786559 (Accessed 15 July 2018).
Pennington, H. 2012. For student success, stop debating and start improving. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://www.chronicle.com. (Accessed 7 September 2018).
Scheurman, G. 1998. From behaviorist to constructivist teaching. Social Education 62(1). www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/files (Accessed 25 May 2020).
Thurlings, M., M. Vermeulen, T. Bastiaens and S. Stijnen. 2013. Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review 9: 1‒15. https://www.pure.tue.nl/ws/files (Accessed 1 January 2020).
UNSW Sydney. 2018. Giving assessment feedback. www.teaching.unsw.edu.au (Accessed 22 July 2018).
Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. San Diego: University of California.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
