Quality Assurance-Student Involvement Confluence: Exploring Gaps and Implications for Higher Education Institutions in Zimbabwe
Abstract
Since postulation, the student involvement (SI) theory of development by Alexander Astin has been crucial in reconfiguring and maximizing the higher education experience through improving the quality. Student-input is instrumental in examining student-experience and managing the quality in higher-education-institutions (HEIs). Amidst industrial revolutionary technologies that transcend bureaucratic procedures governing HEIs, involving students, most of whom are technologically savvy, potentially sparks innovation. Transitioning from education 3.0 to doctrine education 5.0 has implications of quality assurance (QA)-student involvement (SI) confluence on Zimbabwe’s HEIs. Two out of nine HEIs in Matabeleland were selected for convenience of location. Findings show SI should precede QA outcomes although HEI practices do-not reflect this important means-to-an-end-relationship. To attain quality under the doctrine, SI must satisfy students on all doctrine 5.0’s standards. Few HEI-programmes target SI for QA. Programming gaps affect student-learning, hence innovative learning-systems must respond to evolving societal-needs and satisfy students-diversity including in curriculum-development; staff-quality; and research and development-projects. Thus, SI reflects placation at best and tokenism at worst. Government/HEIs must export leading academics, fund their attainment of updated skills-set from modernised countries, and deploy them to reorient HEI programmes while concurrently modernising industries to ensure newly attained skills have platforms for applicability.
References
Agius, Karl. 2011. The status of student participation in Europe. The European Students’ Union Aghveran, Armenia.
Aikman, David. 2017. The fourth Industrial revolution and society 5.0. World Economic Forum (WEF) 3. Davos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faC-9rDZWUQ
Astin, Alexander, W. 1991. Assessment for excellence. New York: ACE Macmillan.
Astin, Alexander. W. 1993. What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. The Journal Higher Education 22(8): 74‒75.
Astin, Alexander, W. 1995. The cause of citizenship. Chronicle of Higher Education 6 October.
Astin, Alexander, W. 1999. Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development 40(5): 518‒529.
Benito‐Osorio, D., Guerras‐Martín L. Ángel and Zuñiga‐Vicente J. Ángel. 2013. Four decades of research on product diversification: A literature review. Management Decision 50(2): 325‒344. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211203597. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
D’Arcy, Kelly. 2014. Structural dimensions of student involvement and their relationship to student development. PhD dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
Delfino, Armando P. 2019. Student engagement and academic performance of students of Partido State University. Faculty of Education, Partido State University, Philippines.
Education Reform. 2014. Education reform 2014. https://repurposingeducationreform.blogspot. com/2014/
ESIB. 2019. Science meets economy. Graz, Australia. https://esib2019.b2match.io/
Garwe, E. C. 2014. The effect of institutional leadership on quality of higher education provision. Research in Higher Education Journal 22.
Goldkuhl, G. 2012. Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems 21(2): 135‒146.
Goles, Tim and Rudy Hirschheim. 1999. The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead ... Long live the paradigm: The legacy of Burrell and Morgan. Omega 28: 249‒268.
Great Zimbabwe University (GZU). 2019. Education 5.0 unpacked. News Magazine. https://services. gzu.ac.zw/news/
Green, D. 1990. What is quality in higher education? Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Hanrahan, Mary. 1998. The effect of learning environment factors on students' motivation and learning. International Journal of Science Education 20(6): 737‒753. Taylor & Francis.
Hernandez, Karen, Stacey Hogan, Cynthia Hathaway and Cheryl D. Lovell. 1999. Analysis of the literature on the impact of student involvement on student development and learning: More questions than answers? NASPA Journal 36(3): 184‒197.
Jonathan, Enock. 2019. Education 5.0 ‒ towards problem-solving and value creation. Bulawayo 24 News. https://bulawayo24.com/index-id-opinion-sc-columnist-byo-157170.html
Kanyongo, Gibbs Y. 2005. Zimbabwe’s public education system reforms: Successes and challenges. International Education Journal 6(1): 65‒74.
Kuh, George D. and John H. Schuh. 1991. The role and contribution of student affairs in involving colleges. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, Inc., 1875 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 418, Washington, DC 20009-5728.
Lagemann, Ellen C. and Harry Lewis. 2012. What is college for? The public purpose of higher education. Teachers College Press. 1234 Amsterdam Avenue, New York.
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Streel level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Long, Patricia N. and Marilyn J. Amey. 1993. A study of underprepared students at one community college: Assessing the impact of student and institutional input, environmental, and output variables on student success. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. 4 November. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED365177.pdf
Luescher-Mamashela, Thierry M. 2013. Student representation in university decision making: Good reasons, a new lens? Studies in Higher Education 38(10): 1442‒1456.
Maker Faire. 2019. Maker Faire. https://makerfaire.com/
Mulinge, Munyae M., Josephine N. Arasa and V. Wawire. 2017. The status of student involvement in university governance in Kenya: The case of public and private universities. CODESRIA.
Murwira, Amos. 2019. Education 5.0 ‒ towards problem-solving and value creation. http://www. mhtestd. gov.zw/?p=3501
National Research Council. 2001. Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National Academies Press.
Newton, Kenneth. 2001. Trust, social capital, civil society and democracy. International Political Science Review 22(2). Sage journals.
Pascarella, Enerst T. 1985. College environmental influences on students' educational aspirations. Sociology. The Journal of Higher Education 55(6): 751‒771. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1984.11778692
Peck, A., C. Cramp, L. Croft, T. Cummings, K. Fehring, D. Hall and J. Lawhead. 2015. Considering the impact of participation and employment of students in campus activities and collegiate recreation on the development of the skills employers desire most. http://nirsa.net/nirsa/wpcontent/uploads/ NACA_NIRSA_White_Paper.pdf
Prottas, Jeffrey, M. 1978. The power of the street ‒ Level bureaucrat in public service bureaucracies. Urban Affairs Quarterly 13: 289.
Reeves, C. A. and D. A. Bednar. 1994. Defining quality: Alternatives and implications. The Academy of Management Review 19(3): 419‒445.
Schwab, Klaus. 2016. The fourth industrial revolution: What it means, how to respond. World Economic Forum 14(1). Crown Business.
Seyfried, Markus and Philipp Pohlenz. 2018. Assessing quality assurance in higher education: Quality managers’ perceptions of effectiveness. European Journal of Higher Education 8(3): 258‒271.
Tapera, Julius. 2016. Promoting quality assurance in Zimbabwean higher education institutions: Concepts, systems and processes. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311186790
Terenzini, Patrick T., Laura I. Rendon, Lee M. Upcraft, Susan B. Millar, Kevin W. Allison, Patricia L. Gregg and Romero Jalomo. 1984. The transition to college: Diverse students, diverse stories. Research in Higher Education 35: 57‒73.
Tinto, V. 1993. Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. 2nd Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Van Der Bank, C. M. and B. A. Popoola. 2014. A theoretical framework of total quality assurance in a university of technology. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 3(4): 401.
Zhao, Jing and Dorinda J. Gallant. 2012. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37(2): 227‒235.
Zikmund, William G., Barry J. Babin, Jon C. Carr and Mitch Griffin. 2003. Business research methods. 7th Edition. Thomson/South-Western.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
